Cited by 434Mental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Research TopicsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

DSM-5 and RDoC: progress in psychiatry research?

Open access
Casey, B. J., Craddock, Nick, Cuthbert, Bruce N., Hyman, Steven E., Lee, Francis S., Ressler, Kerry J.·2013·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroscience studies into psychiatric disorders generally rely on disease definitions that are based on the influential Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the fifth edition of which (DSM-5) was released earlier this year. Designed as a purely diagnostic tool, the DSM considers different disorders as distinct entities. However, boundaries between disorders are often not as strict as the DSM suggests. To provide an alternative framework for research into psychiatric disorders, the US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has recently introduced its Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project. In the RDoC, five 'domains' each reflect a brain system in which functioning is impaired, to different degrees, in different psychiatric conditions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience asked six leading investigators for their thoughts on how DSM-5 and the RDoC will influence neuroscience research into psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn3621

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casey, B. J., Craddock, N., Cuthbert, B. N., Hyman, S. E., Lee, F. S., & Ressler, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Casey, B. J.
  • Craddock, Nick
  • Cuthbert, Bruce N.
  • Hyman, Steven E.
  • Lee, Francis S.
  • Ressler, Kerry J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2013-10-18
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
810-814
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1997159235
Cited by
434
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 1
FWCI
236.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH079513)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS052819)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
DSM-5, Research Domain Criteria, psychiatric classification, dimensional psychiatry, diagnostic criteria, psychiatric neuroscience, mental illness, National Institute of Mental Health
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Brain, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatry, United States, Biomedical Research, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review