Cited by 4Action Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

Asymmetric projection of introspection reveals a behavioural and neural mechanism for interindividual social coordination

Open access
Miyamoto, Kentaro, Harbison, Caroline, Tanaka, Shiho, Saito, Marina, Luo, Shuyi, Matsui, Sara, Sankhe, Pranav, Mahmoodi, Ali +4 more·2025·Nature Communications

Abstract

When we collaborate with others to tackle novel problems, we anticipate how they will perform their part of the task to coordinate behavior effectively. We might estimate how well someone else will perform by extrapolating from estimates of how well we ourselves would perform. This account predicts that our metacognitive model should make accurate predictions when projected onto people as good as, or worse than, us but not on those whose abilities exceed our own. We demonstrate just such a pattern and that it leads to worse coordination when working with people more skilled than ourselves. Metacognitive projection is associated with a specific activity pattern in anterior lateral prefrontal cortex (alPFC47). Manipulation of alPFC47 activity altered metacognitive projection and impaired interpersonal social coordination. By contrast, monitoring of other individuals’ observable performance and outcomes is associated with a distinct pattern of activity in the posterior temporal parietal junction (TPJp). When we collaborate with others to tackle novel problems, we anticipate how they will perform their part effectively. Miyamoto et al find that metacognitive projection mediated by anterior lateral prefrontal cortex enables this social coordination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-55202-0

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several areas of the human prefrontal cortex have been linked to metacognition and confidence in addition to goal maintenance.

    “Several areas of the human prefrontal cortex have been linked to metacognition and confidence in addition to goal maintenance,7”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (page not provided) links frontal regions to metacognition and confidence, and the Results link anterior lateral prefrontal activity to prospective metacognitive judgments. Our copy does not link those regions to goal maintenance, so that part of the cited sentence is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Variation in prospective confidence prior to even taking a decision determines which decision problems an individual attempts to solve in the first place.

    “while variation in prospective confidence prior to even taking a decision determines which decision problems an individual attempts to solve in the first place.12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, K., Harbison, C., Tanaka, S., Saito, M., Luo, S., Matsui, S., Sankhe, P., Mahmoodi, A., Lin, M., Trudel, N., Shea, N., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Miyamoto, Kentaro
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-01-20
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
295-295
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406624133
Cited by
4
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SAS-Space (University of London) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Brain/MINDS2.0, JP23wm0625001)
  • Wellcome Trust (221794/Z/20/Z)
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JP23H03843, JP22H00092, JP22K18665, DC1/PD)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P024955/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24K22795, 24KF0091, JP23H03843, 22K18665, 22H00092)
  • RIKEN
  • H2020 European Research Council (681422)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
self-reflection, social coordination, collaborative problem solving, metacognition, individual differences in ability, neural basis of social cognition
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Social Behavior, Temporal Lobe, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review