Cited by 45Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural dynamics and brain function

Identification and disruption of a neural mechanism for accumulating prospective metacognitive information prior to decision-making

Open access
Miyamoto, Kentaro, Trudel, Nadescha, Kamermans, Kevin, Lim, Michele C., Lazari, Alberto, Verhagen, Lennart, Wittmann, Marco K., Rushworth, Matthew F.S.·2021·Neuron

Abstract

More than one type of probability must be considered when making decisions. It is as necessary to know one's chance of performing choices correctly as it is to know the chances that desired outcomes will follow choices. We refer to these two choice contingencies as internal and external probability. Neural activity across many frontal and parietal areas reflected internal and external probabilities in a similar manner during decision-making. However, neural recording and manipulation approaches suggest that one area, the anterior lateral prefrontal cortex (alPFC), is highly specialized for making prospective, metacognitive judgments on the basis of internal probability; it is essential for knowing which decisions to tackle, given its assessment of how well they will be performed. Its activity predicted prospective metacognitive judgments, and individual variation in activity predicted individual variation in metacognitive judgments. Its disruption altered metacognitive judgments, leading participants to tackle perceptual decisions they were likely to fail.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.02.024

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several areas of the human prefrontal cortex have been linked to metacognition and confidence in addition to goal maintenance.

    “Several areas of the human prefrontal cortex have been linked to metacognition and confidence in addition to goal maintenance,7”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page not provided) links the anterior lateral prefrontal cortex to prospective metacognition and the medial frontopolar cortex to confidence in perceptual decisions. It does not establish the sentence’s additional claim about goal maintenance. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Variation in prospective confidence prior to even taking a decision determines which decision problems an individual attempts to solve in the first place.

    “while variation in prospective confidence prior to even taking a decision determines which decision problems an individual attempts to solve in the first place.12”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, K., Trudel, N., Kamermans, K., Lim, M. C., Lazari, A., Verhagen, L., Wittmann, M. K., & Rushworth, M. F. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Miyamoto, Kentaro
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
109
Issue
8
Pages
1396-1408.e7
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139165825
Cited by
45
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ESRC
  • JSPS
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
metacognition, decision-making, neural mechanisms, individual differences, perceptual decision making, neural manipulation
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review