Cited by 179Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Social transmission and buffering of synaptic changes after stress

Sterley, Toni-Lee, Baimoukhametova, Dinara, Füzesi, Tamás, Zurek, Agnieszka A., Daviu, Nuria, Rasiah, Neilen P., Rosenegger, David, Bains, Jaideep S.·2018·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Stress can trigger enduring changes in neural circuits and synapses. The behavioral and hormonal consequences of stress can also be transmitted to others, but whether this transmitted stress has similar effects on synapses is not known. We found that authentic stress and transmitted stress in mice primed paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons, enabling the induction of metaplasticity at glutamate synapses. In female mice that were subjected to authentic stress, this metaplasticity was diminished following interactions with a naive partner. Transmission from the stressed subject to the naive partner required the activation of PVN CRH neurons in both subject and partner to drive and detect the release of a putative alarm pheromone from the stressed mouse. Finally, metaplasticity could be transmitted sequentially from the stressed subject to multiple partners. Our findings demonstrate that transmitted stress has the same lasting effects on glutamate synapses as authentic stress and reveal an unexpected role for PVN CRH neurons in transmitting distress signals among individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-017-0044-6

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sterley, T.-L., Baimoukhametova, D., Füzesi, T., Zurek, A. A., Daviu, N., Rasiah, N. P., Rosenegger, D., & Bains, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Bains, Jaideep S.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
393-403
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2778525502
Cited by
179
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
metaplasticity, glutamatergic synapses, paraventricular nucleus, corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons, alarm pheromone, stress buffering, social interaction, female mice
MeSH terms
CRF Receptor, Type 1, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Female, Glutamates, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus, Pheromones, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Synapses, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review