The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 118 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity
Open accessAbstract
The rapid elimination of dying neurons and nonfunctional synapses in the brain is carried out by microglia, the resident myeloid cells of the brain. Here we show that microglia clearance activity in the adult brain is regionally regulated and depends on the rate of neuronal attrition. Cerebellar, but not striatal or cortical, microglia exhibited high levels of basal clearance activity, which correlated with an elevated degree of cerebellar neuronal attrition. Exposing forebrain microglia to apoptotic cells activated gene-expression programs supporting clearance activity. We provide evidence that the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) epigenetically restricts the expression of genes that support clearance activity in striatal and cortical microglia. Loss of PRC2 leads to aberrant activation of a microglia clearance phenotype, which triggers changes in neuronal morphology and behavior. Our data highlight a key role of epigenetic mechanisms in preventing microglia-induced neuronal alterations that are frequently associated with neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Microglia clearance activity in adult brain is regulated epigenetically and region-specifically to match neuronal attrition rates. Uncoupling this activity from neural apoptosis leads to aberrant microglia activation & neurodegenerative-like changes.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Microglia clearance activity in the adult mouse brain is regionally regulated, with cerebellar microglia showing high basal clearance linked to neuronal attrition while striatal and cortical microglia suppress clearance genes via PRC2/H3K27me3. Loss of PRC2 in microglia aberrantly activates a clearance phenotype that alters neuronal morphology and behavior.
Key findings
- Cerebellar microglia (cbMg) display a primed/phagocytic phenotype—less ramified morphology, reduced branching, decreased cell volume, increased CD68+ lysosome content, and DAPI+ nuclear material—and are enriched in clearance genes including Apoe, Axl, Colec12, Cd74, Lilrb4, Mrc1, and Ms4a7; they also show increased uptake of apoptotic Jurkat cells compared with striatal microglia (stMg).
- Chronic microglia depletion with PLX5622 (~99% ablation) led to accumulation of cCASP3+ and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells in the cerebellum but not striatum; AXL/MERTK deficiency also caused cerebellar cCASP3+ cell accumulation.
- PRC2/H3K27me3 suppresses clearance genes in stMg; Eed ablation in microglia led to upregulation of 44/215 cbMg-enriched genes and downregulation of 313/643 stMg signature genes, with increased lysosomal content and a shift toward a clearance-promoting phenotype.
- PRC2-deficient microglia caused reduced medium spiny neuron spine numbers, impaired cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, enhanced anxiety, mild cognitive/memory impairment, and recurrent seizures in >50% of aged mutant mice; these anxiety and seizure phenotypes were not observed in one-year-old wild-type mice chronically depleted of microglia.
Methods
- Mouse genetics and manipulations: microglia-specific TRAP using Cx3cr1CreErt2/+; Eef1a1LSL.eGFPL10a/+ mice, conditional Eedfl/fl ablation, PLX5622 microglia depletion, Axl−/−Mertk−/− mice, primary neonatal/adult microglia cultures, and exposure to early apoptotic Jurkat cells.
- Data types: bulk RNA-seq, single-nuclei RNA-seq, H3K27me3 ChIP-seq, qPCR, Western blot, immunofluorescence, phagocytosis assays, Golgi/spine analysis, and behavioral tests (open field, elevated plus maze, novel object recognition, fear conditioning, cocaine locomotor sensitization, seizure/survival curves).
- Main analysis: DESeq2, edgeR, limma, MACS peak calling, Gene Ontology enrichment, and t-tests/ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis/log-rank tests as appropriate.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: TRAP may omit genes shared between microglia and neurons, astrocytes, or other cell types; a comparative in vivo analysis quantifying phagocytic activity in individual cbMg versus stMg is still needed; other cues such as neuronal activity, neurotransmitter release, and microglia-recognized ligands cannot be fully excluded; a demethylase-independent function of KDM6B cannot be excluded.
- Evident from the text: gene expression and protein analyses were not performed blind to experimental conditions; some sequencing comparisons used small sample sizes (e.g., n=2 per region/age); no statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes; data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
63 Own result · 60 Not checked yet · 36 Own method · 28 Own interpretation · 3 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In particular, a significant fraction of the cbMg-expressed genes have been implicated in the detection, engulfment, and catabolism of debris both in peripheral macrophages carrying out cell clearance21 as well as in microglia associated with ageing and neurodegeneration11–13.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [21] Blander, J. M. The many ways tissue phagocytes respond to dying cells. Immunol. Rev. 277, 158–173 (2017). source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [11] Mathys, H. et al. Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 21, 366–380 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [12] Wang, Y. et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section ('TREM2 is required for reactive microgliosis'; page unavailable) reports altered gene expression in microglia from an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model, and the Discussion links their response to Aβ removal. The paper does not establish that a significant fraction of cerebellar microglia-expressed genes are involved in debris detection, engulfment, and catabolism, nor does it identify an ageing-related gene overlap. (LLM, conf=0.79)
- Partly supportedcites [13] Krasemann, S. et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47, 566–581.e9 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that cerebellar microglia (cbMg), unlike microglia in the striatum (stMg), display morphological features and gene expression patterns that support clearance function (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which correlated with an elevated degree of cerebellar neuronal attrition.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, stMg are enriched in mRNAs encoding mature microglia-specific homeostatic surveillance proteins14,15, including those that mediate G-protein-coupled chemosensing, chemotaxis, GTP signaling, and actin polymerization20 (Fig. 1d,e, Supplementary Fig. 5a,b, Supplementary Table 3).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Butovsky, O. et al. Identification of a unique TGF-β-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 131–143 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Buttgereit, A. et al. Sall1 is a transcriptional regulator defining microglia identity and function. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1397–1406 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Madry, C. & Attwell, D. Receptors, ion channels, and signaling mechanisms underlying microglial dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 12443–12450 (2015). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that cbMg display a significant enrichment in mRNAs associated with cell clearance functions (Fig. 1d,e, Supplementary Fig. 5a,b, Supplementary Table 3).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Co-incubation of acutely isolated cbMg and stMg from 3-4 month-old Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice with apoptotic Jurkat cells (Supplementary Fig 7e) resulted in increased apoptotic cell uptake by cbMg as compared to stMg (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig 7f).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lastly, we found that adult cbMg display a significantly increased efficiency in the engulfment of apoptotic cells as compared to stMg.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, microglia in the striatum, which like the cerebellum, is characterized by a rather homogenous neuron population, display a homeostatic surveillance phenotype14,15.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Butovsky, O. et al. Identification of a unique TGF-β-dependent molecular and functional signature in microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 131–143 (2014). source
- Not checked yetcites [15] Buttgereit, A. et al. Sall1 is a transcriptional regulator defining microglia identity and function. Nat. Immunol. 17, 1397–1406 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, microglia-specific ablation of PRC2 leads to the aberrant acquisition of a clearance phenotype in striatal and cortical microglia even in the absence of dying neurons.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that cerebellar microglia display a distinct clearance phenotype characterized by the expression of numerous genes supporting the engulfment and catabolism of cells and cellular debris.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 51
- It may state two separate claims as one. 45
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Only uniquely mapped reads were retained, and the alignments were subsequently filtered using the SAMtools package (v0.1.19)88 to remove duplicate reads.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of H3K27me3 ChIP sequencing
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [88] Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). source
Section 2.2, “SAMtools software package,” identifies SAMtools as software for manipulating alignments and explicitly says it can remove PCR duplicates. The citation is attached to SAMtools in the citing sentence; the choice to retain only uniquely mapped reads describes the citing authors’ workflow, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“We used the negative binomial (NB) model implemented in edgeR (3.10.0)79–83 for our single cell differential expression analysis to explicitly account for the sparse count matrix”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [79] Robinson, M. D. & Smyth, G. K. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics 9, 321–332 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Section 2.3 describe a negative binomial model for count-based differential-expression analysis of SAGE tags. Section 7.1 also considers zero counts, but the paper does not establish that an edgeR model accounts for a sparse single-cell count matrix; its setting is SAGE libraries, not single-cell data. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [80] Robinson, M. D. & Smyth, G. K. Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance. Bioinformatics 23, 2881–2887 (2007). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.2 describes a negative binomial model for differential expression of tag counts, and §4.3 discusses handling tags with zero counts in SAGE data. The paper does not establish that edgeR 3.10.0 uses this model to explicitly account for a sparse single-cell count matrix; its application is to replicated tag-count libraries, not single-cell data. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [81] Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Model section states that edgeR models count data with a negative binomial distribution for differential expression analysis. It does not address single-cell data or say that the model explicitly accounts for a sparse count matrix; it describes dispersion as accounting for biological variation between samples. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [82] McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion and Results (‘Linear models for multifactor experiments’; page not provided) describe negative-binomial models for RNA-seq read counts implemented in edgeR. They do not establish that the model explicitly accounts for sparse single-cell count matrices; the paper discusses biological and technical variation in RNA-seq experiments instead. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [83] Zhou, X., Lindsay, H. & Robinson, M. D. Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e91 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction identifies edgeR as an implementation of a negative binomial model for count-based differential expression, and Materials and Methods describes the NB model used for read counts. Our copy does not establish that this model explicitly accounts for sparsity in a single-cell count matrix; the Introduction describes it as accounting for biological variability in genome-scale count data. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“leading to impaired motor responses, to decreased learning and memory, and to the development of anxiety and seizures in mice.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, cbMg show an increase in the expression of genes characteristic of immature microglia9,10, as well as genes that are expressed in neurodegenerative disease-associated microglia (such as primed microglia, MGnD, and DAMs)11–13 (Supplementary Fig. 5c,d, Supplementary Table 4).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Mass, E. et al. Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis. Science 353, aaf4238 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Matcovitch-Natan, O. et al. Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science 353, aad8670 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Mathys, H. et al. Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 21, 366–380 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Wang, Y. et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Krasemann, S. et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47, 566–581.e9 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“cbMg in the adult mouse brain show a primed/phagocytic microglia phenotype11–13 characterized by a less ramified morphology, reduced branching sites (Supplementary Fig. 1a), decreased cell volume (Supplementary Fig. 1b,c), and an increase in CD68+ lysosome content (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1b,c).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Mathys, H. et al. Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 21, 366–380 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Wang, Y. et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Krasemann, S. et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47, 566–581.e9 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A large fraction of the cbMg-enriched genes, including Apoe, Axl, Colec12, Cd74, Lilrb4, Mrc1, and Ms4a7 (Fig. 1d,e, Supplementary Fig. 5a,b, Supplementary Table 3), encode proteins involved in apoptotic cell detection, engulfment, clearance of cell debris, and lipid/protein catabolism and have been shown to support clearance activity in phagocytic macrophages in peripheral tissues21.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Blander, J. M. The many ways tissue phagocytes respond to dying cells. Immunol. Rev. 277, 158–173 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Expression of the clearance-associated proteins AXL, ApoE, CD74, MHCII, and MRC1 is significantly higher in cbMg, while actin polymerization-regulating FSCN1 protein expression shows a significant enrichment in stMg (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 7d).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The changes in PRC2-deficient cbMg gene expression patterns are associated with enhanced cbMg-ramification, a reduction in cbMg lysosomal content (Fig. 6f), and an increased number of cCASP3+ cells in the cerebellum (Fig. 6g).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, the anxiety and seizure phenotypes are not observed in one-year-old wild-type mice that live in the chronic absence of microglia (continuous PLX treatment starting 1 month of age, Supplementary Fig. 13h-j)”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of these down-regulated genes are H3K27me3-negative and are, therefore, not directly controlled by PRC2 in stMg (Fig. 5e).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PRC2 deficiency in cbMg, on the other hand, has no significant impact on cerebellar Purkinje cell spine numbers (Supplementary Fig. 12e) and cerebellum-dependent behaviors (Supplementary Fig. 12f).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The shift of stMg from a surveillance state toward a more clearance-promoting cbMg-like state (Fig. 6a,b), while not affecting overall microglia numbers or morphology (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. 11i), is associated with a significant increase in the stMg lysosomal content (Fig. 6c).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like in the striatum, we found that loss of PRC2 activity in cortical microglia (cxMg) is associated with a similar switch towards a microglia clearance phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 12g), including an increase in cxMg lysosomal content (Supplementary Fig. 12h).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deficiency in Eed has no effect on the overall size and morphology of the striatum (data not shown), MSN density (Supplementary Fig. 12a), or survival as defined by the presence of cCASP3+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 12b).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Co-labeling with different cell type-specific markers revealed that the majority of the apoptotic cells are of neuronal origin and are distributed within all layers of the cerebellum (Supplementary Fig. 9a,b).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia are involved in the clearance of dying cells
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that deficiency in Eed and the ensuing loss of H3K27me3 had no immediate impact on microglia activation but leads to rather moderate and progressive changes in stMg gene expression between 3-9 months of age (Fig. 5e,f).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Likewise, during an elevated plus maze paradigm, mutant mice spend significantly more time in the closed compartment and significantly less time in the more stressful open compartment as compared to their littermate controls (Fig. 7d, Supplementary Fig. 13b,c).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While young Cx3cr1CreErt2/+;Eedfl/fl and control mice did not display any notable seizure events prior to 10 months of age, we detected an increased frequency of handling-induced tonic-clonic seizure episodes in aged mutant mice (Fig. 7e, Supplementary Fig. 13f).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This exposure to dying cells was associated with the time-dependent induction of cbMg-enriched transcription factors (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 10c) as well as the down-regulation of stMg enriched homeostatic surveillance genes (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 10d,e) in the absence of pro-inflammatory gene activation (Supplementary Fig. 10f).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Exposure to dying cells triggers the expression of clearance genes in microglia in vitro
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The deficiency in Eed and the ensuing loss of H3K27me3 led to the up-regulation of several known PRC2 targets, such as Tbx15 and Hoxd830,31 (Fig. 5g,h, Supplementary Fig. 11f,g, Supplementary Table 8,9), but did not affect the expression of genes that define microglia lineage identity (Supplementary Fig. 11f,g, Supplementary Table 8,9) or genes characteristic of microglia pro-inflammatory”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [30] Jadhav, U. et al. Acquired tissue-specific promoter bivalency is a basis for PRC2 necessity in adult cells. Cell 165, 1389–1400 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [31] von Schimmelmann, M. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) silences genes responsible for neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1321–1330 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, loss of PRC2 in cbMg, while following a similar temporal pattern of progressive PRC2 target gene induction (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 11e), is associated with the up-regulation of selected stMg-enriched genes and the down-regulation of cbMg-enriched genes (Fig. 6d,e).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These transcription factors are also induced upon exposure to apoptotic cells as well as in the Eed-deficient stMg, which acquire an aberrant clearance phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 14b).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, we found that both the deletion of microglia as well as the attenuation of their cell clearance capability are associated with the accumulation of dying cells in the cerebellum but not in the striatum or the cortex.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, exposure of forebrain microglia to dying cells in vitro increases the expression of the H3K27me3-specific demethylases, Kdm6a/b, and is associated with the progressive activation of cbMg-enriched clearance genes.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All cells were positive for Cx3cr1, Csf1r, Hexb, or Tmem119.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Staurosporine-treated Jurkat cells were ~70% positive for phosphatidylserine staining and ~95% negative for propidium iodide staining identifying the major population as early apoptotic (Supplementary Fig. 7e).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Treatment of adult or neonatal microglia cultures with early apoptotic Jurkat cells (EAJ)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SW p-value was < 0.0001 for all samples.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we show that microglia clearance activity in the adult brain is regionally regulated and depends on the rate of neuronal attrition.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The cerebellar microglia phenotype is reminiscent of microglia during early brain development9,10 as well as microglia associated with neurodegenerative disease11–13.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] Mass, E. et al. Specification of tissue-resident macrophages during organogenesis. Science 353, aaf4238 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Matcovitch-Natan, O. et al. Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science 353, aad8670 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Mathys, H. et al. Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 21, 366–380 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [12] Wang, Y. et al. TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell 160, 1061–1071 (2015). source
- Not checked yetcites [13] Krasemann, S. et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47, 566–581.e9 (2017). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Development and ageing of the brain are associated with the attrition and loss of neurons1.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Dickstein, D. L., Weaver, C. M., Luebke, J. I. & Hof, P. R. Dendritic spine changes associated with normal aging. Neuroscience 251, 21–32 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One of the brain regions displaying the most pronounced age-dependent neuronal loss is the cerebellum, where neuronal numbers start declining at the end of adolescence3,4.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Woodruff-Pak, D. S. et al. Differential effects and rates of normal aging in cerebellum and hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1624–1629 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Morterá, P. & Herculano-Houzel, S. Age-related neuronal loss in the rat brain starts at the end of adolescence. Front. Neuroanat. 6, 45 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we show that the TRAP approach not only allows for the region-specific analysis of microglia-enriched mRNA expression (Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1) but also precludes nonspecific microglia activation and concurrent up-regulation of immediate early and pro-inflammatory genes that occur during commonly used microglia isolation approaches (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplement”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition to its known role in autophagy22, LC3 has been recently identified as a novel regulator of rapid apoptotic cell clearance in macrophages in a process termed LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), which occurs in the absence of immune activation23.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia display cellular phenotypes and gene expression patterns associated with cell clearance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Galluzzi, L. et al. Molecular definitions of autophagy and related processes. EMBO J. 36, 1811–1836 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Heckmann, B. L., Boada-Romero, E., Cunha, L. D., Magne, J. & Green, D. R. LC3-associated phagocytosis and inflammation. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 3561–3576 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While the age-dependent loss of cerebellar mass and neuronal numbers3,4 implies ongoing cell death, we could not detect dying cells in the cerebellum of adult wild-type mice.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Cerebellar microglia are involved in the clearance of dying cells
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Woodruff-Pak, D. S. et al. Differential effects and rates of normal aging in cerebellum and hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1624–1629 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Morterá, P. & Herculano-Houzel, S. Age-related neuronal loss in the rat brain starts at the end of adolescence. Front. Neuroanat. 6, 45 (2012). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which indicates that the behavioral changes are unlikely due to a general loss of microglia function but rather reflect the aberrant microglia clearance activity in the striatum and cortex.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Microglia-specific Eed ablation was induced by tamoxifen treatment between 4-6 weeks of age in order to exclude any impact of PRC2 inactivation on microglia development (Fig. 5a).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“KDM6A/B mediate the removal of the suppressive chromatin modification H3K27me3, which is associated with silenced genes26.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Exposure to dying cells triggers the expression of clearance genes in microglia in vitro
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Swigut, T. & Wysocka, J. H3K27 demethylases, at long last. Cell 131, 29–32 (2007). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The induction of behavioral locomotor sensitization in response to cocaine depends on the structural plasticity of MSNs and is associated with lasting changes in MSN spine density32.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Nestler, E. J. The neurobiology of cocaine addiction. Sci. Pract. Perspect. 3, 4–10 (2005). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Disorders accompanied by alterations in spine numbers, including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders, are frequently associated with the development of anxiety and seizures33 and cognitive decline34.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > Aberrant expression of clearance-specific genes in striatal microglia has a negative impact on striatal neuron morphology and function
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Friedman, D., Honig, L. S. & Scarmeas, N. Seizures and epilepsy in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 18, 285–294 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Hong, S. et al. Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models. Science 352, 712–716 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“H3K27me3 is mediated by PRC2, which has a well-established role in the regulation of cell differentiation during development16.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Margueron, R. & Reinberg, D. The polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 469, 343–349 (2011). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Enrichment of mRNAs encoding the H3K27me3-specific demethylases, KDM6A/B26 in cbMg (Supplementary Fig. 5b, Supplementary Table 3) as well as the up-regulation of Kdm6a/b in microglia upon exposure to dying cells in vitro (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 10g) point to the possible role of PRC2/H3K27me3 in suppressing clearance-promoting genes in stMg.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Swigut, T. & Wysocka, J. H3K27 demethylases, at long last. Cell 131, 29–32 (2007). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, our data point to a largely selective role of PRC2 in the maintenance of regional microglia specification in the adult brain, where it controls the cell-intrinsic suppression of an aberrant pro-phagocytic/clearance-like phenotype in stMg in vivo.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Results > PRC2 controls a clearance-related gene expression program in vivo.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The possible causal role of H3K27me3 in suppressing clearance-promoting genes in microglia is supported at several levels.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recent evidence suggests that microglia can sense and clear apoptotic cells at the earliest stages of apoptosis25.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Fourgeaud, L. et al. TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology. Nature 532, 240–244 (2016). source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“On the other hand, increased activation of the MEK-ERK pathway has been linked to Ezh2 overexpression48.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Fujii, S. et al. RAS oncogenic signal upregulates EZH2 in pancreatic cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 417, 1074–1079 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This process, often referred to as efferocytosis, is a multi-step process: (i) the recognition of “eat-me” signals presented by apoptotic cells, (ii) engulfment of cells/debris, (iii) degradation of engulfed material, and (iv) excretion of metabolic products21.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Blander, J. M. The many ways tissue phagocytes respond to dying cells. Immunol. Rev. 277, 158–173 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While the loss of PRC2 activity is associated with reduced MEK-ERK activation in ES cells47, the inhibition of MEK-ERK activity leads to attenuated PRC2 chromatin association on PRC2 target genes in these cells47.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Tee, W.-W., Shen, S. S., Oksuz, O., Narendra, V. & Reinberg, D. Erk1/2 activity promotes chromatin features and RNAPII phosphorylation at developmental promoters in mouse ESCs. Cell 156, 678–690 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our data also show that microglia clearance function, while important for the removal of dying cells, must be tightly controlled in other brain regions to avoid microglia-mediated damage of healthy neurons.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The lack of inflammatory gene activation in cbMg suggests that the microglia clearance activity may antagonize/suppress the activation of inflammatory genes in a fashion that has been observed in peripheral macrophages21,23.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Blander, J. M. The many ways tissue phagocytes respond to dying cells. Immunol. Rev. 277, 158–173 (2017). source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Heckmann, B. L., Boada-Romero, E., Cunha, L. D., Magne, J. & Green, D. R. LC3-associated phagocytosis and inflammation. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 3561–3576 (2017). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The ability of aberrant intrinsically activated microglia to cause neuronal damage is further supported by recent findings showing that cell-autonomous activation of the RAF–MEK–ERK pathway in microglia leads to the loss of synapses and the development of a severe late-onset neurodegenerative disorder7.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Mass, E. et al. A somatic mutation in erythro-myeloid progenitors causes neurodegenerative disease. Nature 549, 389–393 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While most of the newly generated neurons/T-cells undergo apoptotic cell death, the dying cells cannot be readily detected due to their rapid removal by resident macrophages/microglia25,39.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Fourgeaud, L. et al. TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology. Nature 532, 240–244 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Dzhagalov, I. L., Chen, K. G., Herzmark, P. & Robey, E. A. Elimination of self-reactive T cells in the thymus: a timeline for negative selection. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001566 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“recent studies using a small molecule-based inhibitor specifically targeting KDM6A/B demethylase activity revealed that H3K27 demethylation, and more specifically KDM6A/B catalytic activity, are critical determinants of pro-inflammatory gene activation in human primary macrophages28.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Kruidenier, L. et al. A selective jumonji H3K27 demethylase inhibitor modulates the proinflammatory macrophage response. Nature 488, 404–408 (2012). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on these data, it is plausible that clearance gene expression in microglia is controlled in a KDM6A/B/H3K27me3-dependent fashion and that the induction of clearance genes is associated with a targeted reduction in H3K27me3 levels at specific clearance gene loci in vivo.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All subjects correspond to data points within two standard deviations from the sample mean, and no subjects were excluded from the behavioral analyses.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Behavioral analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ChIP-seq data was first checked for quality using the various metrics generated by FastQC (v0.11.2; http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of H3K27me3 ChIP sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications19,31,95,99,108.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For all behavioral experiments, a mixed population of males and females with sex- and age-matched corresponding littermate control animals were used.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Behavioral analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tg(Vav1-iCre), Tg(Csf1r-iCre), and Tg(Csf1r-Cre/Esr1*) lines were excluded due to neuronal targeting, while the Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Jung) line was excluded due to insufficient targeting of microglia.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and the outliers were further justified by the aforementioned quality control metrics as well as experimental metadata.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No randomization protocol was used.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Behavioral analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In brief, exon 6 was chosen for gene deletion as a single base pair mutation in this exon was previously shown to disrupt the interaction of EED with EZH1/2 proteins, thus resulting in an Eed-null phenotype61,62.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Schumacher, A., Faust, C. & Magnuson, T. Positional cloning of a global regulator of anterior-posterior patterning in mice. Nature 384, 648 (1996). source
- Not checked yetcites [62] Denisenko, O., Shnyreva, M., Suzuki, H. & Bomsztyk, K. Point mutations in the WD40 domain of Eed block its interaction with Ezh2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5634–5642 (1998). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The quality of the library pools was assessed by 2200 TapeStation (Agilent).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Single nuclei sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Normal distribution was assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk (SW) normality test.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We included plates as covariates to account for confounding effect of individuals in the generalized linear model”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“only samples with RIN>9 were considered for subsequent analysis.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bulk RNA sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All mice used for experiments were backcrossed to the C57Bl/6 background for ≥ 5 generations.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data collection was randomized for all experiments.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications19,31,95,99,108.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Heiman, M. et al. A translational profiling approach for the molecular characterization of CNS cell types. Cell 135, 738–748 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [31] von Schimmelmann, M. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) silences genes responsible for neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1321–1330 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [95] Schaefer, A. et al. Control of cognition and adaptive behavior by the GLP/G9a epigenetic suppressor complex. Neuron 64, 678–691 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and the quasi-likelihood framework within edgeR to handle the pronounced variability of the single cell expression states.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79] Robinson, M. D. & Smyth, G. K. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data. Biostatistics 9, 321–332 (2008). source
- Not checked yetcites [80] Robinson, M. D. & Smyth, G. K. Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance. Bioinformatics 23, 2881–2887 (2007). source
- Not checked yetcites [81] Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010). source
- Not checked yetcites [82] McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012). source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Zhou, X., Lindsay, H. & Robinson, M. D. Robustly detecting differential expression in RNA sequencing data using observation weights. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e91 (2014). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This line was used as an alternative TRAP line to ensure that region-specific gene expression changes are not caused by Cx3cr1 haplo-insufficiency in the Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt) mice.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultures were regularly tested negative for mycoplasma using Lonza kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (MycoAlert LT-07).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Treatment of adult or neonatal microglia cultures with early apoptotic Jurkat cells (EAJ)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cells with fewer than 100,000 mapped reads were removed.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimenters were blinded during imaging and behavioral experiments.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt)52 line was selected for all subsequent experiments due to its highly efficient (>99% of microglia) and microglia-specific Cre expression pattern throughout the brain.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Parkhurst, C. N. et al. Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell 155, 1596–1609 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cells pretreated with 2 μM Cytochalasin D (Sigma-Aldrich, C8273) for 30 min before and during the incubation of microglia with pHrodo-EAJ were used as a negative control.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Treatment of adult or neonatal microglia cultures with early apoptotic Jurkat cells (EAJ)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gender ratios and ages were matched within control and treatment groups.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis of imaging data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For antibody staining controls, primary antibody incubation was omitted, and instead slides were incubated with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Immunofluorescence
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For TRAP from Eed-deficient microglia, Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt);Eef1a1LSL.eGFPL10a/+;Eedfl/fl mice were compared to Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt);Eef1a1LSL.eGFPL10a/+;Eedfl/+ sex- and age-matched littermate controls.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (TRAP)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Furthermore, aberrantly activated EZH2 was recently found to synergistically cooperate with hyperactive BRAF in the regulation of tumorigenesis49.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Souroullas, G. P. et al. An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Nat. Med. 22, 632–640 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Animals were allocated to treatment groups to ensure uniform distribution of ages and sexes in each group.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Behavioral analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, hierarchical clustering was used to assess the outliers once again to protect against false positives/negatives from PCA”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The expression of IRES-YFP did not interfere with microglia TRAP efficiency.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the top 500 most variable genes across all samples based on the VST data to visually assess if there were any outliers.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cx3cr1+ perivascular/meningeal macrophages were identified by low Tmem119, low Hexb, and high Mrc1 expression35,84 and excluded from single cell analysis (n=1-5 per plate).”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of single-nuclei sequencing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Goldmann, T. et al. Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat. Immunol. 17, 797–805 (2016). source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Bennett, M. L. et al. New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1738–E1746 (2016). source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gene expression and protein analyses were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Statistical analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Comparisons for Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt);Eef1a1LSL.eGFPL10a/+;Eedfl/fl mice were carried out with age- and sex-matched control Cx3cr1CreErt2/+(Litt);Eef1a1LSL.eGFPL10a/+;Eedfl/+ mice.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Increased EZH2 expression/activity is associated with a genome-wide redistribution of H3K27me3 that includes the loss of H3K27me3 and the transcriptional activation of numerous PRC2 suppressed genes in these cells49.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Souroullas, G. P. et al. An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Nat. Med. 22, 632–640 (2016). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C57Bl/6J wild-type mice were used to test for nonspecific mRNA enrichment.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (TRAP)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The read alignment, read counting as well as quality assessment using metrics such as total mapping rate, mitochondrial and ribosomal mapping rates were done in parallel using an in-house workflow pipeline called SPEctRA70.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Bioinformatic analysis of bulk sequencing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] Purushothaman, I. & Shen, L. SPEctRA: First stable release. https://zenodo.org/record/60547#.WyweGlVKipp (2016).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A cohort of Cx3cr1CreErt2/+ and their respective Cx3cr1+/+ wild-type littermate controls were tested on selected behavior paradigms to exclude potential behavioral alterations due to Cx3cr1 haploinsufficiency in Cx3cr1CreErt2/+; Eedfl/fl mice.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Behavioral analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Microglia express all core components of PRC2: EZH1, EZH2, EED, and SUZ12.
“Similar to neurons and other cell types, microglia express all of the core components of PRC2: EZH1, EZH2, EED, and SUZ12 (data not shown).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Microglial heterogeneity can also be represented by measurements other than gene transcription, such as electrophysiological properties, epigenetic features or functional readouts (Ayata et al., 2018; De Biase et al., 2017).”
From Developmental Heterogeneity of Microglia and Brain Myeloid Cells Revealed by Deep Single-Cell RNA Sequencing (2019) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent progress in single-cell deep sequencing methods allowed for more refined differentiation and revealed regional-, age- and sex-dependent differences of the microglial population, and a growing number of studies demonstrate various expression profiles defining microglial subpopulations.”
From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent experiments using deep sequencing revealed differences not only depending on the brain region, but also on age, gender, and pathology [28,39,99,102,108,109].”
From Beyond Activation: Characterizing Microglial Functional Phenotypes (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in which TAM-induced Cre expression results in chronic recombination in microglia, but not in transient myeloid cells.”
From Microglial INPP5D limits plaque formation and glial reactivity in the PSAPP mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast to striatum microglia (stMG), cerebellar microglia (cbMg) displayed a phagocytic microglia phenotype with reduced ramifications and cell volume that is characteristic of immature microglia and MGnD, but lack enrichment of pro-inflammatory genes in mice [42].”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lineage-tracing experiments using a microglia-specific genetic approach (translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) mice28; Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 3) confirmed that the plaque-associated CSF1R-independent PU.1low cells, despite showing low Csf1r gene expression (Supplementary Figs. 1h and 2f), are bona fide microglia.”
From Lymphoid gene expression supports neuroprotective microglia function (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Crossing these mice to microglia-specific Cre mice allows for the isolation of ribosome-associated mRNAs in a cell-type-specific fashion using eGFP-based immunoaffinity purification28,91,93.”
From Lymphoid gene expression supports neuroprotective microglia function (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, adult microglia stained negative for Fos/Egr1 transcripts or proteins, whereas their expression was readily detected in the surrounding non-microglial cells”
From Developmental Heterogeneity of Microglia and Brain Myeloid Cells Revealed by Deep Single-Cell RNA Sequencing (2019) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“These results indicate that the previously observed regional differences in adult microglia (Ayata et al., 2018) might mainly arise from genes expressed by small percentages of TMEM119low/− microglia (e.g. residual CLEC7A+ cells shown in Figures 7A–7D), which were gated out in our bulk RNA-seq analysis.”
From Developmental Heterogeneity of Microglia and Brain Myeloid Cells Revealed by Deep Single-Cell RNA Sequencing (2019) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Consistent with this interpretation, many genes (Apoe, Igf1, Lilrb4, Lyz2, Colec12, Msr1, Map1lc3b) that were shown to be part of the phagocytic signature in adult cerebellar microglia (Ayata et al., 2018) were also up-regulated in PAM (Table S5).”
From Developmental Heterogeneity of Microglia and Brain Myeloid Cells Revealed by Deep Single-Cell RNA Sequencing (2019) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Single-nuclei RNA-seq and proteomic analysis validated that mouse cbMg expressed higher levels of clearance-associated proteins such as AXL, LC3, APOE, CD74, MHCII, and MRC1.”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“In the adult brain, clearance activity of microglia is suppressed in areas with low frequency of neuronal deaths [42].”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“These studies demonstrate the epigenetic regulation of clearance-associated genes for the regulation of microglial phagocytosis in a brain region-specific manner.”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This region-dependent phagocytic activity is regulated via suppression of clearance-related genes by epigenetic modification of H3K27me3 based on ChIP-Seq analysis.”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Microglia can efficiently clear apoptotic cells and debris, which is regulated by H3K27me3, a histone methylation occurring on the amino (N) terminal tail of the core histone H3.”
From Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Microglia in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“However, recent evidence suggests that the regional particularities of microglia are primarily driven by differences in the neighboring neurons (Ayata et al., 2018).”
From Selective Neuronal Vulnerability in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Network-Based Analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Previous studies on Huntington’s disease have consistently detected signs of neuronal epigenetic instability (Ayata et al., 2018; von Schimmelmann et al., 2016).”
From Age-dependent instability of mature neuronal fate in induced neurons from Alzheimer’s patients (2021) · cites this paper as Ayata et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Morphological analysis of microglia
“20 μm z-stack images were obtained from 4-/6-month-old wild-type mice or 12-month-old Cx3cr1CreErt2/+; Eedfl/+ and Cx3cr1CreErt2/+; Eedfl/fl mice”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Morphological analysis of microglia
“n=3 mice/genotype were used to compare 15-month-old control and Cx3cr1CreErt2/+; Eedfl/fl mice.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Animals
“For microglia ablation, 2-month-old wild-type or Cx3cr1GFP/+ mice were treated with CSF1R inhibitor, PLX5622 (1200 mg/kg chow, Plexxikon, Berkeley, CA), or vehicle for a minimum of 60 days.”
§ Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity > Online Methods > Immunofluorescence
“4-month-old wild-type mice treated with PLX or control diet for 6-8 weeks”
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386
Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update
Kuleshov, M. V., Jones, M. R., Rouillard, A. D., Fernandez, N. F., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Koplev, S., Jenkins, S. L., Jagodnik, K. M., Lachmann, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377 · Cited by 10,799
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 472
Sullivan, O., & Ciernia, A. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.989011 · Cited by 23
Microglial Rac1 is essential for experience-dependent brain plasticity and cognitive performance
Socodato, R., Almeida, T. O., Portugal, C. C., Santos, E. C. D. S., Tedim-Moreira, J., Galvão-Ferreira, J., Canedo, T., Baptista, F. I., Magalhães, A., Ambrósio, A. F., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113447 · Cited by 26
Spatial and single-cell transcriptomics reveal the reorganization of cerebellar microglia with aging
Tsai, A. P., Henze, D. E., Lopez, E. R., Haberberger, J., Dong, C., Lu, N., Atkins, M., Costa, E. K., Farinas, A., Oh, H. S., et al. (2025) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116624 · Cited by 23
Genetic background mutations drive neural circuit hyperconnectivity in a fragile X syndrome model
Kennedy, T., Rinker, D. C., & Broadie, K. S. (2020) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-020-00817-0 · Cited by 19
Emerging Roles of Microglia in Neuro-vascular Unit: Implications of Microglia-Neurons Interactions
Ding, Z., Guo, S., Luo, L., Zheng, Y., Gan, S., Kang, X., Wu, X., & Zhu, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2021.706025 · Cited by 23
Salcido, F. A. M., Torres-Flores, M. I., Ordaz, B., & Peña‐Ortega, F. (2022) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24185 · Cited by 21
Yuan, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, G., Zhou, X., Dong, X., Lou, Z., Li, S., & Wang, D. (2022) · Metabolic Brain Disease · doi:10.1007/s11011-022-01031-3 · Cited by 21
Freire‐Cobo, C., Rothwell, E. S., Varghese, M., Edwards, M. M., Janssen, W. G. M., Agnès Lacreuse, A., & Hof, P. R. (2022) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.12.001 · Cited by 21
Xie, S.-T., Fan, W.-C., Zhao, X.-S., Ma, X., Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Yang, F., Shi, Y. K., Rong, H., Cui, Z.-S., et al. (2023) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106773 · Cited by 21
Tremblay, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.628347 · Cited by 21
Type I interferon signalling and interferon‐responsive microglia in health and disease
López‐Atalaya, J. P., & Bhojwani-Cabrera, A. M. (2025) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70126 · Cited by 23
PAX6-positive microglia evolve locally in hiPSC-derived ocular organoids
Shiraki, N., Maruyama, K., Hayashi, R., Oguchi, A., Murakawa, Y., Katayama, T., Takigawa, T., Sakimoto, S., Quantock, A. J., Tsujikawa, M., et al. (2022) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.12.009 · Cited by 20
Cuní‐López, C., Stewart, R., Quek, H., & White, A. R. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11101662 · Cited by 19
Li, S., Wernersbach, I., Harms, G. S., & Schäfer, M. K. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.945485 · Cited by 22
Rim, C., Park, H., You, M., Yang, B., Kim, H.-J., Sung, S., & Kwon, M. (2022) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-022-00280-6 · Cited by 19
Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation of axon regeneration
Cheng, Y., Song, H., Ming, G., & Weng, Y. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02028-9 · Cited by 21
Nicotinic regulation of microglia: potential contributions to addiction
Soares, A. R., & Picciotto, M. R. (2023) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-023-02703-9 · Cited by 25
Aging phenotype in AD brain organoids: Track to success and challenges
Hossain, M. K., Kim, H., & Chae, H. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102256 · Cited by 25
Creus‐Muncunill, J., Haure‐Mirande, J., Mattei, D., Bons, J., Jimenez, A. V. R., Hamilton, B. W., Corwin, C., Chowdhury, S., Schilling, B., Ellerby, L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-024-03052-4 · Cited by 21
Immune Regulation of Adult Neurogenic Niches in Health and Disease
Chintamen, S., Imessadouene, F., & Kernie, S. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.571071 · Cited by 22
Tuddenham, J. F., Taga, M. F., Haage, V. C., Roostaei, T., White, C. C., Lee, A., Fujita, M., Khairallah, A., Green, G., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.04.494709 · Cited by 20
Borggrewe, M., Kooistra, S. M., Wesseling, E. M., Gierschek, F. L., Brummer, M. L., Nowak, E. C., Medeiros-Furquim, T., Otto, T. A., Lee, S. W., Noelle, R. J., et al. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-021-01186-7 · Cited by 20
Immune-Triggered Forms of Plasticity Across Brain Regions
Hikosaka, M., Kawano, T., Wada, Y., Maeda, T., Sakurai, T., & Ohtsuki, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.925493 · Cited by 21
Neuroglia in Psychiatric Disorders
Scuderi, C., Verkhratsky, A., Parpura, V., & Li, B. (2021) · Advances in neurobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77375-5_1 · Cited by 19
Suleri, A., Blok, E., Durkut, M., Rommel, A.-S., Witte, L. D., Jaddoe, V., Bergink, V., & White, T. (2022) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2022.03.018 · Cited by 18
Microglia networks within the tapestry of alzheimer’s disease through spatial transcriptomics
Zhou, Y. F., & Glass, C. K. (2025) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00897-y · Cited by 21
Alterations in Chromatin Structure and Function in the Microglia
Fujita, Y., & Yamashita, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.626541 · Cited by 22
Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of microglia in substance use disorders
Vilca, S. J., Margetts, A. V., Pollock, T. A., & Tuesta, L. M. (2023) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2023.103838 · Cited by 20
Phenomic Microglia Diversity as a Druggable Target in the Hippocampus in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Lana, D., Magni, G., Landucci, E., Wenk, G. L., Pellegrini-Giampietro, D. E., & Giovannini, M. G. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241813668 · Cited by 20
Bordt, E. A., Moya, H., Jo, Y. C., Ravichandran, C. T., Bankowski, I. M., Ceasrine, A. M., McDougle, C. J., Carlezon, W. A., & Bilbo, S. D. (2022) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.010 · Cited by 21
Kaurani, L., Islam, M. R., Heilbronner, U., Krüger, D. M., Zhou, J., Methi, A., Strauss, J., Pradhan, R., Schröder, S., Burkhardt, S., et al. (2024) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00067-8 · Cited by 17
Boyle, B. R., Melli, S. E., Altreche, R. S., Padron, Z. M., Yousufzai, F. A. K., Kim, S., Vasquez, M. D., Carone, D. M., Carone, B. R., & Soto, I. (2020) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.189019 · Cited by 18
Role of Microglia in Central Nervous System Development and PlasticityPreprint
Schafer, D. P., Stevens, B., Bennett, M. L., & Bennett, F. C. (2024) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041810 · Cited by 19
Liu, C., Gao, X., Shi, R., Wang, Y., He, X., Du, H., Hu, B., Jiao, J., Liu, C., & Teng, Z. (2023) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/cpr.13439 · Cited by 16
Vilca, S. J., Margetts, A. V., Höglund, L., Fleites, I., Bystrom, L. L., Pollock, T. A., Bourgain‐Guglielmetti, F., Wahlestedt, C., & Tuesta, L. M. (2024) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.05.038 · Cited by 19
Gao, M., Wang, X., Su, S., Feng, W., Lai, Y., Huang, K., Cao, D., & Wang, Q. (2024) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-23-01595 · Cited by 18
Impact of neonatal anoxia and hypothermic treatment on development and memory of rats
Matsuda, V. D. V., Bustelo, M., Motta‐Teixeira, L. C., Ikebara, J. M., Cardoso, D. S., Machado‐Nils, A. V., Lee, V. Y., Diccini, I., Arruda, B. P., Martins, P. P., et al. (2021) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113691 · Cited by 17
Pathological changes in mice with long term cuprizone administration
Nomura, T., Bandô, Y., Nakazawa, H., Kanemoto, S., & Yoshida, S. (2019) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2019.03.018 · Cited by 16
Peterson, C. W., Adair, J. E., Wohlfahrt, M. E., Deléage, C., Radtke, S., Rust, B. J., Norman, K. K., Norgaard, Z. K., Schefter, L. E., Sghia-Hughes, G., et al. (2019) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.05.016 · Cited by 15
Bhatti, D. L., Medrihan, L., Chen, M. X., Jin, J., McCabe, K. A., Wang, W., Azevedo, E. P., Ledo, J. H., & Kim, Y. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.898851 · Cited by 16
Bellizzi, M. J., Hammond, J. W., Li, H., Marker, M. A. G., Marker, D. F., Freeman, R. S., & Gelbard, H. A. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0245-18.2018 · Cited by 16
Yamawaki, Y., Wada, Y., Matsui, S., & Ohtsuki, G. (2022) · Current Research in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100028 · Cited by 16
Sex and Region-Specific Differences in Microglial Morphology and Function Across Development
Bishnoi, I. R., & Bordt, E. A. (2025) · Neuroglia · doi:10.3390/neuroglia6010002 · Cited by 19
Aliaghaei, M., & Haun, J. B. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.841046 · Cited by 15
Synapse-specific roles for microglia in development: New horizons in the prefrontal cortex
Blagburn-Blanco, S. V., Chappell, M. S., Biase, L. M. D., & DeNardo, L. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.965756 · Cited by 16
Shih, B. B.-J., Brown, S. M., Barrington, J., Lefèvre, L., Mabbott, N. A., Priller, J., Thompson, G., Lawrence, A. B., & McColl, B. W. (2022) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24274 · Cited by 14
Ngozi, Z., & Bolton, J. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.867217 · Cited by 16
Dynamic changes in mitochondria support phenotypic flexibility of microglia
Espinoza, K., Schaler, A. W., Gray, D. T., Sass, A. R., Escobar, A., Moore, K., Yu, M. A., Chamorro, C. G., & Biase, L. M. D. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66709-5 · Cited by 15
Ciani, M., Rigillo, G., Benatti, C., Pani, L., Blom, J. M. C., Brunello, N., Tascedda, F., & Alboni, S. (2024) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x22666240705143649 · Cited by 14
Alberry, B., Castellani, C. A., & Singh, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-020-09316-3 · Cited by 14
Phagocytic microglia in development: Are they what they eat?
VanRyzin, J. W. (2021) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100373 · Cited by 15
Ito, N., Maruko, A., Oshima, K., Yoshida, M., Honma, K., Sugiyama, C., Nagai, T., Kobayashi, Y., Odaguchi, H., & Okada, N. (2022) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.203811 · Cited by 14
de Prisco, N., Chemiakine, A., Lee, W., Botta, S., & Gennarino, V. A. (2022) · STAR Protocols · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101244 · Cited by 14
Cerneckis, J., & Shi, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1198715 · Cited by 14
Jayaraj, K., Kumar, R. N., Shyamasundar, S., Arumugam, T. V., Polepalli, J. S., & Dheen, S. T. (2025) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.70035 · Cited by 14
Cealie, M. Y., Douglas, J. C., Le, L., VonKaenel, E. D., McCall, M. N., Drew, P. D., & Majewska, A. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1176581 · Cited by 11
Nutritional neurology: Unraveling cellular mechanisms of natural supplements in brain health
Kumar, S., Malviya, R., & Sundram, S. (2023) · Human Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.hnm.2023.200232 · Cited by 16
Diversity of microglial transcriptional responses during opioid exposure and neuropathic pain
Sypek, E. I., Tassou, A., Collins, H. Y., Huang, K., McCallum, W. M., Bourdillon, A. T., Barres, B. A., Bohlen, C. J., & Scherrer, G. (2024) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003275 · Cited by 14
Park, B., & Choi, G. E. (2025) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102786 · Cited by 13
Song, R., Ali, M. A., Pan, J., Smith, C. J., Nistal, D. A., Scaggiante, J., Chartrain, A. G., Lara‐Reyna, J., Liang, J. W., Mocco, J., et al. (2021) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.128 · Cited by 13
Du, H., Tan, Y. H., Li, C., Zhao, Y., Li, P., Ning, Y., Gao, R., Wang, B., Peng, Y., Tan, S.-W., et al. (2021) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136431 · Cited by 13
Analysis of microglial BDNF function and expression in the motor cortex
Honey, D., Wosnitzka, E., Klann, E., & Weinhard, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.961276 · Cited by 17
Cerebellar microglia: On the edge between neuroinflammation and neuroregulation
Dukhinova, M., Guo, J., Shen, E.-W., Liu, W., Huang, W., Shen, Y., & Wang, L. (2024) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-24-00550 · Cited by 15
Bridging regional neurovascular unit heterogeneity and cognitive function: a review
Tsintzou, A., Poirier, R., Harati, R., Kustubayeva, A., Disdier, C., Hamoudi, R., & Mabondzo, A. M. (2025) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-025-00697-y · Cited by 13
Xu, Y., Koch, S. C., Chamessian, A. G., He, Q., Sundukova, M., Heppenstall, P. A., Xu, Y., Fitzgerald, M., & Beggs, S. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1354-23.2023 · Cited by 12
Hallmark Molecular and Pathological Features of POLG Disease are Recapitulated in Cerebral Organoids
Chen, A., Yangzom, T., Hong, Y., Lundberg, B. C., Sullivan, G. J., Tzoulis, C., Bindoff, L. A., & Liang, K. X. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202307136 · Cited by 12
Targeting neuronal epigenomes for brain rejuvenation
Zocher, S. (2024) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00148-8 · Cited by 13
Mulenge, F., Gern, O. L., Busker, L. M., Aringo, A., Ghita, L., Waltl, I., Pavlou, A., & Kalinke, U. (2024) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-024-03197-2 · Cited by 12
General Pathophysiology of Microglia
Tremblay, M., & Verkhratsky, A. (2024) · Advances in neurobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55529-9_1 · Cited by 13
Novel insights into the dynamic function of PRC2 in innate immunity
Kempkes, R. W. M., Prinjha, R. K., de Winther, M. P. J., & Neele, A. E. (2024) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2024.10.003 · Cited by 13
Matt, S. M., Nolan, R., Manikandan, S., Agarwal, Y., Channer, B., Oteju, O., Daniali, M., Canagarajah, J., LuPone, T., Mompho, K., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-025-03403-9 · Cited by 14
Gaunt, J. R., Zainolabidin, N., Yip, A. K. K., Tan, J. M., Low, A. Y. T., Chen, A. I., & Ch’ng, T. H. (2023) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02913-8 · Cited by 12
Nigrostriatal degeneration determines dynamics of glial inflammatory and phagocytic activity
Ayerra, L., Abellanas, M. A., Basurco, L., Tamayo, I., Conde, E., Tavira, A., Trigo, A., Vidaurre, C., Vilas‐Zornoza, A., Martín‐Úriz, P. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-024-03091-x · Cited by 12
Transcription factors that define the epigenome structures and transcriptomes in microglia
Saeki, K., & Ozato, K. (2025) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2025.104814 · Cited by 11
Microglial phagocytosis in epilepsy: Mechanisms and impact
Barath, A. S., & Wu, L. (2025) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp288573 · Cited by 17
Microglia Sculpt Sex Differences in Social Behavior
Smith, C. J. W., & Bilbo, S. D. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.039 · Cited by 11
Serotonin and 5-HT2B receptors in microglia control of behavior
D’Andrea, I., Béchade, C., & Maroteaux, L. (2020) · Handbook of behavioral neuroscience · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64125-0.00034-7 · Cited by 12
Circulatory proteins shape microglia state and boost phagocytosisPreprint
Lu, N., Losada, P. M., Hahn, O., Saksena, A., Tapp, E., Chadarevian, J. P., Dong, W., Shi, S. M., Shuken, S. R., Guldner, I. H., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.30.615861 · Cited by 12
Hu, Y., & Gao, J. (2025) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2025.104054 · Cited by 10
Ramirez, J. J., Hardin, E. J., Sakers, K., Kim, J., Ortiz, C. K. C., Savage, J. T., Hanamsagar, R., Block, C. L., Singh, S. K., Bilbo, S. D., et al. (2026) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.12.028 · Cited by 14
Anwar, M. M., Pérez‐Martínez, L., & Pedraza‐Alva, G. (2024) · Immunological Investigations · doi:10.1080/08820139.2024.2358446 · Cited by 11
Hikosaka, M., Parvez, M. S. A., Yamawaki, Y., Oe, S., Yuan, L., Wada, Y., Hirahara, Y., Koike, T., Imai, H., Oishi, N., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07566-2 · Cited by 13
Glial Cells and Aging: From the CNS to the Cerebellum
Sala, G. L., & Farini, D. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26157553 · Cited by 12
Clearing Your Mind: Mechanisms of Debris Clearance After Cell Death During Neural Development
Liu, K. E., Raymond, M. H., Ravichandran, K. S., & Kucenas, S. (2022) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-022431 · Cited by 10
Wasl is crucial to maintain microglial core activities during glioblastoma initiation stages
Mazzolini, J., Clerc, S. L., Morisse, G., Coulonges, C., Zagury, J., & Sieger, D. (2022) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24154 · Cited by 10
Ceasrine, A. M., Batorsky, R., Shook, L. L., Kışlal, S., Bordt, E. A., Devlin, B. A., Perlis, R. H., Slonim, D. K., Bilbo, S. D., & Edlow, A. G. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.12.03.471177 · Cited by 9
A physics-informed deep learning liquid crystal camera with data-driven diffractive guidance
Shi, J., Liu, T., Zhou, L., Yan, P., Wang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Communications Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44172-024-00191-7 · Cited by 9
Human pluripotent stem cell-derived models of the hippocampus
Nishimura, H., & Li, Y. (2024) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2024.106695 · Cited by 9
Kumaraguru, S., Morgan, J., & Wong, F. K. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adq5842 · Cited by 10
Alterations in microglial morphology concentrate in the habitual sleeping period of the mouse
Steffens, S. K., Stenberg, D., & Wigren, H. (2022) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24279 · Cited by 9
Brown, F. N., Iwasawa, E., Shula, C., Fugate, E. M., Lindquist, D. M., Mangano, F. T., & Goto, J. (2023) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-023-00433-4 · Cited by 10
Proteomic examination of the neuroglial secretome: lessons for the clinic
Kim, J., Afridi, R., Lee, W., & Suk, K. (2020) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2020.1745069 · Cited by 9
Lowery, R. L., Latchney, S. E., Peer, R. P., Lamantia, C. E., Lordy, K. A., Opanashuk, L. A., McCall, M. N., & Majewska, A. K. (2022) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2022.01.013 · Cited by 9
Epigenetic alterations fuel brain metastasis via regulating inflammatory cascade
Maurya, S. K., Rehman, A. U., Zaidi, M. A. A., Κhan, P., Gautam, S. K., Santamaria‐Barria, J. A., Siddiqui, J. A., Batra, S. K., & Nasser, M. W. (2022) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.11.001 · Cited by 10
Chatila, Z. K., Yadav, A., Mares, J., Flowers, X. E., Yun, T., Rashid, M., Talcoff, R., Pelly, Z., Zhang, Y., Jager, P. L. D., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.17.540842 · Cited by 11
Distinct microglial transcriptomic signatures within the hippocampus
Chintamen, S., Gaur, P., Vo, N., Bradshaw, E. M., Menon, V., & Kernie, S. G. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296280 · Cited by 12
Llach, C.-D., Le, G. H., Shah, H., Marcato, L. M., Brietzke, E. M., Gill, H., Tabassum, A., Badulescu, S., Rosenblat, J. D., McIntyre, R. S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2025.578587 · Cited by 8
Early‐life thermal stress mediates long‐term alterations in hypothalamic microglia
Ben‐Nun, O., Kisliouk, T., Marco, A., Rosenberg, T., & Meiri, N. (2021) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.24129 · Cited by 10
Nicolai, L., Nettesheim, P., de Witte, L. D., & Snijders, G. J. L. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100465 · Cited by 9
Ghosh, S., Finnemann, S. C., Vollrath, D., & Rothlin, C. V. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25105299 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayata, P., Badimon, A., Strasburger, H. J., Duff, M. K., Montgomery, S. E., Loh, Y.-H. E., Ebert, A., Pimenova, A. A., Ramirez, B. R., Chan, A. T., Sullivan, J. M., Purushothaman, I., Scarpa, J. R., Goate, A. M., Busslinger, M., Shen, L., Losic, B., & Schaefer, A.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (AT)
- Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schaefer, Anne
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2018-07-23
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1049-1060
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC6090564
- OpenAlex
- W2884747366
- Semantic Scholar
- 4867b1fa05a975b5ea4f8970411f2805a0ada330
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG049688, RF1AG054011)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH111147, DP2MH100012, R21MH115353, F30MH106293)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R03DA025962)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS091574)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- microglia, epigenetic regulation, polycomb repressive complex 2, apoptosis, cerebellum, striatum, cortex, brain region specificity, microglial activation, neurodegeneration, mental illness, neuronal morphology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Macrophage Activation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Seizures, Synapses, Cell Death, Neostriatum, Apoptosis, Microglia, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review