Cited by 583Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases

Open access
Dawson, Ted M., Golde, Todd E., Lagier-Tourenne, Clotilde·2018·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Animal models of adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases have enhanced the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nevertheless, our understanding of these disorders and the development of mechanistically designed therapeutics can still benefit from more rigorous use of the models and from generation of animals that more faithfully recapitulate human disease. Here we review the current state of rodent models for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We discuss the limitations and utility of current models, issues regarding translatability, and future directions for developing animal models of these human disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-018-0236-8

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Dawson, T. M., Golde, T. E., & Lagier-Tourenne, C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
  • Dawson, Ted M.
  • Golde, Todd E.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2018-09-24
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1370-1379
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2891411797
Cited by
576
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 4
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG018454, U01AG046139, P50AG047266)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA166009)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS098006, R01NS087227, R01NS082205, P50NS038377)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
animal models, neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, rodent models, translatability, disease modeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review