Cited by 70Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Working memory training mostly engages general-purpose large-scale networks for learning

Open access
Salmi, Juha, Nyberg, Lars, Laine, Matti·2018·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

HighlightsWe performed the first meta‐analysis of fMRI studies on working memory (WM) training.We demonstrated that WM training modulates only the canonical WM network.This general‐purpose brain network was also modulated by perceptual‐motor learning.Only DLPFC/VLPFC was highlighted in WM training studies. ABSTRACT The present meta‐analytic study examined brain activation changes following working memory (WM) training, a form of cognitive training that has attracted considerable interest. Comparisons with perceptual‐motor (PM) learning revealed that WM training engages domain‐general large‐scale networks for learning encompassing the dorsal attention and salience networks, sensory areas, and striatum. Also the dynamics of the training‐induced brain activation changes within these networks showed a high overlap between WM and PM training. The distinguishing feature for WM training was the consistent modulation of the dorso‐ and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC/VLPFC) activity. The strongest candidate for mediating transfer to similar untrained WM tasks was the frontostriatal system, showing higher striatal and VLPFC activations, and lower DLPFC activations after training. Modulation of transfer‐related areas occurred mostly with longer training periods. Overall, our findings place WM training effects into a general perception‐action cycle, where some modulations may depend on the specific cognitive demands of a training task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.019

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging evidence indicates that the frontostriatal system mediates near transfer, while dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal regions use domain-general networks that support broader learning.

    “neuroimaging research suggests that the frontostriatal system mediates near transfer effects whereas the dorso- and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices appear to employ domain-general networks that facilitate learning more wide5.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salmi, J., Nyberg, L., & Laine, M.
Affiliations
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Salmi, Juha
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
93
Pages
108-122
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793100538
Cited by
70
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Åbo Akademi University Endowment
  • Academy of Finland (#260276)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory training, cognitive training, perceptual-motor learning, dorsal attention network, salience network, striatum, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, frontostriatal circuits, transfer of training, training duration, perception-action cycle
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Practice, Psychological, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review