Cited by 185Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMemory and Neural MechanismsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 1. Review of methodologies currently employed

Geuze, E, Vermetten, E, Bremner, J D·2005·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

The advance of neuroimaging techniques has resulted in a burgeoning of studies reporting abnormalities in brain structure and function in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders. Measurement of hippocampal volume has developed as a useful tool in the study of neuropsychiatric disorders. We reviewed the literature and selected all English-language, human subject, data-driven papers on hippocampal volumetry, yielding a database of 423 records. From this database, the methodology of all original manual tracing protocols were studied. These protocols differed in a number of important factors for accurate hippocampal volume determination including magnetic field strength, the number of slices assessed and the thickness of slices, hippocampal orientation correction, volumetric correction, software used, inter-rater reliability, and anatomical boundaries of the hippocampus. The findings are discussed in relation to optimizing determination of hippocampal volume.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.mp.4001580

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Volumetric changes of the hippocampus that occur with age, with various neuropsychiatric disorders, and also in response to stress are quite heterogeneous.

    “While some of the reasons for this may be methodological such as MR image acquisition parameters, post acquisition processing and the method used for volumetric assessment (Geuze et al., 2005; Morey et al., 2009), it is clear that volumetric changes of the hippocampus that occur with age, with various neuropsychiatric disorders, and also in response to stress are quite heterogeneous.”

    From Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression (2013) · cites this paper as Geuze et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geuze, E., Vermetten, E., & Bremner, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Central Military Hospital (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Geuze, E
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2004-08-31
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
147-159
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W1995415763
Cited by
185
References
138
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Ministerie van Defensie
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056120, R01MH56120)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
hippocampal volumetry, hippocampal volume, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic field strength, slice thickness, inter-rater reliability, neuropsychiatric disorders, brain structure
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Organ Size, Reproducibility of Results, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review