The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations
Open accessAbstract
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has successfully been used in various organisms for precise targeted gene editing. Although it has been demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 system can induce mutation in tomato plants, the stability of heredity in later generations and mutant specificity induced by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in tomato plants have not yet been elucidated in detail. In this study, two genes, SlPDS and SlPIF4, were used for testing targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants through an Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation method. A high mutation frequency was observed in all tested targets in the T0 transgenic tomato plants, with an average frequency of 83.56%. Clear albino phenotypes were observed for the psd mutants. High frequencies of homozygous and biallelic mutants were detected even in T0 plants. The majority of the detected mutations were 1- to 3-nucleotide deletions, followed by 1-bp insertions. The target mutations in the T0 lines were stably transmitted to the T1 and T2 generations, without new modifications or revision. Off-target activities associated with SlPDS and SlPIF4 were also evaluated by sequencing the putative off-target sites and no clear off-target events were detected. Our results demonstrate that the CRISPR/Cas9 system is an efficient tool for generating stable and heritable modifications in tomato plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062
Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System
Zetsche, B., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Slaymaker, I. M., Makarova, K. S., Essletzbichler, P., Volz, S. E., Joung, J., van der Oost, J., Regev, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · Cited by 4,761
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Lin, C.-Y., Gootenberg, J. S., Konermann, S., Trevino, A. E., Scott, D. A., Inoue, A., Matoba, S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · Cited by 3,299
High-Frequency off-Target Mutagenesis Induced by CRISPR-Cas Nucleases in Human Cells
Fu, Y., Foden, J. A., Khayter, C., Maeder, M. L., Reyon, D., Joung, J. K., & Sander, J. D. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2623 · Cited by 3,292
The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11119 · Cited by 3,289
Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M., & Lander, E. S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246981 · Cited by 2,856
RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems
Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F., & Marraffini, L. A. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2508 · Cited by 2,429
Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Zhu, Q., Liu, W., Chen, Y., Qiu, R., Wang, B., Yang, Z., Li, H., Lin, Y., et al. (2015) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007 · Cited by 2,369
Self-citationGUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases
Tsai, S. Q., Zheng, Z., Nguyen, N. T., Liebers, M., Topkar, V. V., Thapar, V., Wyvekens, N., Khayter, C., Iafrate, A. J., Le, L. P., et al. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3117 · Cited by 2,268
Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Gao, C., & Qiu, J.-L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2969 · Cited by 2,072
Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system
Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Liu, J., Xi, J. J., Qiu, J.-L., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2650 · Cited by 1,810
Virus‐induced gene silencing in tomato
Liu, Y., Schiff, M., & Dinesh‐Kumar, S. P. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01394.x · Cited by 1,654
Yang, H., Wang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Cheng, A. W., Shi, L., & Jaenisch, R. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.022 · Cited by 1,596
Li, J.-F., Norville, J. E., Aach, J., McCormack, M., Zhang, D., Bush, J., Church, G. M., & Sheen, J. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2654 · Cited by 1,510
Pattanayak, V., Lin, S., Guilinger, J. P., Ma, E., Doudna, J. A., & Liu, D. R. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2673 · Cited by 1,487
Jiang, W., Zhou, H., Bi, H., Fromm, M., Yang, B., & Weeks, D. P. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt780 · Cited by 1,247
The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond
Bortesi, L., & Fischer, R. (2015) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 · Cited by 1,187
Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease
Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. G., & Kamoun, S. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2655 · Cited by 1,127
Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system
Feng, Z., Zhang, B., Ding, W., Liu, X., Yang, D.-L., Wei, P., Cao, F., Zhu, S., Zhang, F., Mao, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.114 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationTargeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system
Miao, J., Guo, D., Zhang, J., Huang, Q., Qin, G., Zhang, X., Wan, J., Gu, H., & Qu, L.-J. (2013) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2013.123 · Cited by 913
Mojica, F. J. M., Díez‐Villaseñor, C., Soria, E., & Juez, G. (2000) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x · Cited by 820
RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Plants Using a CRISPR–Cas System
Xie, K., & Yang, Y. (2013) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/sst119 · Cited by 805
DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: All's Well that Ends Well
Wyman, C., & Kanaar, R. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451 · Cited by 803
CRISPR-P: A Web Tool for Synthetic Single-Guide RNA Design of CRISPR-System in Plants
Lei, Y., Lu, L., Liu, H.-Y., Li, S., Xing, F., & Chen, L.-L. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssu044 · Cited by 801
Self-citationZhang, H., Zhang, J., Wei, P., Zhang, B., Gou, F., Feng, Z., Mao, Y., Yang, L., Zhang, H., Xu, N., et al. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12200 · Cited by 792
Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B., & Van Eck, J. (2014) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.114.247577 · Cited by 760
Fauser, F., Schiml, S., & Puchta, H. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12554 · Cited by 713
Targeted Mutagenesis in Zea mays Using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas System
Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Chen, K., & Gao, C. (2014) · Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001 · Cited by 658
Feng, Z., Mao, Y., Xu, N., Zhang, B., Wei, P., Yang, D.-L., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Zheng, R., Yang, L., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400822111 · Cited by 657
Self-citationLin, Y., Cradick, T. J., Brown, M. T., Deshmukh, H., Ranjan, P., Sarode, N., Wile, B. M., Vertino, P. M., Stewart, F. J., & Bao, G. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku402 · Cited by 634
PIFs: Systems Integrators in Plant Development
Leivar, P., & Monte, E. (2014) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.120857 · Cited by 614
Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9
Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J., & Parrott, W. A. (2015) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 · Cited by 577
Application of the CRISPR–Cas System for Efficient Genome Engineering in Plants
Mao, Y., Zhang, H., Xu, N., Zhang, B., Gou, F., & Zhu, J.-K. (2013) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/sst121 · Cited by 575
Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens
McCormick, S., Niedermeyer, J., Fry, J., Barnason, A., Horsch, R., & Fraley, R. (1986) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/bf00269239 · Cited by 564
Targeted Genome Editing of Sweet Orange Using Cas9/sgRNA
Jia, H., & Wang, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093806 · Cited by 487
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish
Hruscha, A., Krawitz, P., Rechenberg, A., Heinrich, V., Hecht, J., Haass, C., & Schmid, B. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.099085 · Cited by 478
Makarova, K. S., Aravind, L., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2011) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-6-38 · Cited by 470
Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation
Fan, D., Liu, T., Li, C., Jiao, B., Li, S., Hou, Y., & Luo, K. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12217 · Cited by 455
Plant Genome Engineering with Sequence-Specific Nucleases
Voytas, D. F. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105552 · Cited by 446
Ron, M., Kajala, K., Pauluzzi, G., Wang, D., Reynoso, M. A., Zumstein, K., Garcha, J., Winte, S., Masson, H., Inagaki, S., et al. (2014) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.114.239392 · Cited by 389
Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Sun, X., Hu, Z., Chen, R., Jiang, Q., Song, G., Zhang, H., & Xi, Y. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep10342 · Cited by 371
A CRISPR/Cas9 Vector System for Tissue-Specific Gene Disruption in Zebrafish
Ablain, J., Durand, E. M., Yang, S., Zhou, Y., & Zon, L. I. (2015) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.032 · Cited by 368
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum
Gao, J., Wang, G., Ma, S., Xie, X., Wu, X., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., Zhao, P., & Xia, Q. (2015) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-014-0263-0 · Cited by 343
Xie, K., Zhang, J., & Yang, Y. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssu009 · Cited by 331
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in the Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L.
Sugano, S. S., Shirakawa, M., Takagi, J., Matsuda, Y., Shimada, T., Hara-Nishimura, I., & Kohchi, T. (2014) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcu014 · Cited by 269
Genome-wide identification and characterization of the bHLH gene family in tomato
Sun, H., Fan, H.-J., & Ling, H.-Q. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-014-1209-2 · Cited by 261
Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice
Xu, R., Li, H., Qin, R., Wang, L., Li, L., Wei, P., & Yang, J. (2014) · Rice · doi:10.1186/s12284-014-0005-6 · Cited by 227
Xu, R.-F., Li, H., Qin, R.-Y., Li, J., Qiu, C.-H., Yang, Y.-C., Ma, H., Li, L., Wei, P.-C., & Yang, J.-B. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep11491 · Cited by 227
Mao, Y., Zhang, Z., Feng, Z., Wei, P., Zhang, H., Botella, J. R., & Zhu, J. (2016) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12468 · Cited by 219
Hyun, Y., Kim, J., Cho, S. W., Choi, Y., Kim, J.-S., & Coupland, G. (2015) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-014-2180-5 · Cited by 167
Jiang, W., Yang, B., & Weeks, D. P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099225 · Cited by 163
Re-engineering plant gene targeting
Britt, A., & May, G. D. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00002-5 · Cited by 120
Homologous recombination: ends as the means
Ray, A., & Langer, M. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02327-0 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Peng, A., Chen, S., Lei, T., Xu, L., He, Y., Wu, L., Yao, L., & Zou, X. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12733 · Cited by 731
Self-citationCRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review
Jaganathan, D., Ramasamy, K., Sellamuthu, G., Jayabalan, S., & Venkataraman, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00985 · Cited by 619
CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing
Manghwar, H., Lindsey, K., Zhang, X., & Jin, S. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006 · Cited by 529
“basic helix-loophelix multigene family [133]”
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation
Wang, X., Tu, M., Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, Y., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12832 · Cited by 367
Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System
Arora, L., & Narula, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01932 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, C., Ye, L., Qin, L., Liu, X., He, Y., Wang, J., Chen, L., & Lu, G.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-04-21
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24765-24765
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2336717918
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 18.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
