Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,790

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory

Open access
Coombs, W Timothy·2007·Corporate Reputation Review

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

3 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K. and Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999) ‘Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values’, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (2), 507–525. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R.E. and Unnava, H.R. (2000) ‘Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment’, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 203–214. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allen, M.W. and Caillouet, R.H. (1994) ‘Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis’, Communication Monographs, 61, 44–62. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alsop, R.J. (2004) The 18 Immutable Laws of Corporate Reputation: Creating, Protecting, and Repairing Your Most Valuable Asset, Free Press, New York, NY.
  5. Barton, L. (2001) Crisis in Organizations II, 2nd edn.,College Divisions South-Western, Cincinnati, OH.
  6. Benoit, W.L. (1995) Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  7. Bradford, J.L. and Garrett, D.E. (1995) ‘The effectiveness of corporate communicative responses to accusations of unethical behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 875–892. · DOI
  8. Carmeli, A. and Tishler, A. (2005) ‘Perceived organizational reputation and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of industrial enterprises’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (1), 13–30. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Carroll, C.E. (2004) ‘How the mass media influence perceptions of corporate reputation: Exploring agenda-setting effects within business news coverage’, Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin,Texas.
  10. Carroll, C.E. and McCombs, M. (2003) ‘Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations’, Corporate Reputation Review, 16, 36–46. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cohen, J.R. (1999) ‘Advising clients to apologize’, Southern California Law Review, 72, 1009–1131.
  12. Coombs, W.T. (1995) ‘Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis response strategies’, Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447–476. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Coombs, W.T. (1998) ‘An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 177–191. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Coombs, W.T. (2004a) ‘A theoretical frame for post-crisis communication: Situational crisis communication theory’, in M.J. Martinko (ed.), Attribution Theory in the Organizational Sciences: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp.275–296.
  15. Coombs, W.T. (2004b) ‘Impact of past crises on current crisis communications: Insights from situational crisis communication theory’, Journal of Business Communication, 41, 265–289. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Coombs, W.T. (2006) ‘The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis’, Journal of Promotion Management, 12, 241–259. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (1996) ‘Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279–295. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (2001) ‘An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 321–340. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (2002) ‘Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory’, Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 165–186. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (2004) ‘Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management’, in D.P. Millar and R.L. Heath (eds.), Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp.95–115.
  21. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (2005) ‘Exploratory study of stakeholder emotions: Affect and crisis’, in N.M. Ashkanasy, W.J. Zerbe and C.E.J. Hartel (eds.), Research on Emotion in Organizations: Volume 1: The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings, Elsevier: New York, pp.271–288.
  22. Cooper, A.H. (2002) ‘Media framing and social movement mobilization: German peace protest against INF missels, the Gulf War, and NATO peace enforcement in Bosnia’, European Journal of Political Research, 41, 37–80. · DOI
  23. Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R.V. and Roper, S. (2003) Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness, Routledge, New York.
  24. Dawar, N. and Pillutla, M.M. (2000) ‘Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations’, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 215–226. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dean, D.H. (2004) ‘Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event’, Journal of Business Communication, 41, 192–211. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Dowling, G. (2002) Creating Corporate Reputations: Identity, Image, and Performance, Oxford University Press, New York.
  27. Druckman, J.N. (2001) ‘The implications of framing effects for citizen competence’, Political Behavior, 23 (3), 225–256. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Fombrun, C.J. and van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) Fame & Fortune: How Successful Companies Build Winning Reputations, Prentice-Hall Financial Times, New York.
  29. Fomrun, C.J. and Gardberg, N. (2000) ‘Who's top in corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (1), 13–17. · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540095
  30. Fuchs-Burnett, T. (2002) ‘Mass public corporate apology’, Dispute Resolution Journal, 57 (3), 26–32.
  31. Gregory, J. R. (1998) ‘Does corporate reputation provide a cushion to companies facing market volatility? Some supportive evidence’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 288–290. · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540050
  32. Härtel, C., McColl-Kennedy, J.R. and McDonald, L. (1998) ‘Incorporating attribution theory and the theory of reasoned action within an affective events theory framework to produce a contingency predictive model of consumer reactions to organizational mishaps’, Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 428–432.
  33. Jorgensen, B.K. (1994) ‘Consumer reaction to company-related disasters: The effect of multiple versus single explanations’, Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 348–352.
  34. Jorgensen, B.K. (1996) ‘Components of consumer reaction to company-related mishaps: A structural equation model approach’, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 346–351.
  35. Joslyn, M.R. (2003) ‘Framing the Lewinsky affair: Third-person judgments by scandal frame’, Political Psychology, 24 (4), 829–844. · doi:10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00356.x
  36. Kelley, H.H. and Michela, J.L. (1980) ‘Attribution theory and research’, Annual Review Psychology, 31, 457–501. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Knight, R.F. and Pretty, D.J. (1999) ‘Corporate catastrophes, stock returns, and trading volume’, Corporate Reputation Review, 2, 363–381. · DOI
  38. Marcus, A.A. and Goodman, R.S. (1991) ‘Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis’, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 281–305. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Martinko, M.J., Douglas, S.C., Ford, R. and Gundlach, M.J. (2004) ‘Dues paying: A theoretical explication and conceptual model’, Journal of Management, 30, 49–69. · DOI
  40. McDonald, L. and Härtel, C.E.J. (2000) ‘Applying the involvement construct to organizational crises’, Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings, Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, pp. 799–803.
  41. Meijer, M.M. (2004) Does Success Breed Success? Effects of News and Advertising on Corporate Reputation, Aksant Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
  42. Mowen, J.C. (1980) ‘Further information on consumer perceptions of product recalls’, Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 519–523.
  43. Nerb, J. and Spada, H. (1997) ‘The role of controllability of the cause in cognitive and emotional evaluation of an environmental risk’, in K. Alef, J. Brandt, H. Fiedler, W. Hauthal, O. Hutzinger, D. Mackay, M. Matthies, K. Morgan, L. Newland, H. Robitaille, M. Schlummer, G. Schüüüürmann and K. Voigt (eds.), ECO-INFORMA ‘97: Information and Communication in Environmental and Health Issues, Eco-Informa Press, Bayreuth, pp.161–166.
  44. Patel, A. and Reinsch, L. (2003) ‘Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability’, Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 17–26. · DOI
  45. Porritt, D. (2005) ‘The reputational failure of financial success: The ‘bottom line backlast’ effect', Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (3), 198–213. · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540250
  46. Reichart, J. (2003) ‘A theoretical exploration of expectational gaps in the corporate issue construct’, Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 58–69. · doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540190
  47. Rousseau, D.M. (2006) ‘Is there such a thing as evidence-based mangement’, Academy of Management Review, 31, 256–269. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Rudolph, U., Roesch, S.C., Greitemeyer, T. and Weiner, B. (2004) ‘A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective’, Cognition and Emotion, 18, 815–848. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Sellnow, T.L., Ulmer, R.R. and Snider, M. (1998) ‘The compatibility of corrective action in organizational crisis communication’, Communication Quarterly, 46, 60–74. · DOI
  50. Siomkos, G.J. and Kurzbard, G. (1994) ‘The hidden crisis in product harm crisis management’, European Journal of Marketing, 28 (2), 30–41. · doi:10.1108/03090569410055265
  51. Siomkos, G. and Shrivastava, P. (1993) ‘Responding to product liability crises’, Long Range Planning, 26 (5), 72–79. · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90079-u
  52. Stockmyer, J. (1996) ‘Brands in crisis: Consumer help for deserving victims’, Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 429–435.
  53. Sturges, D.L. (1994) ‘Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival’, Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 297–316. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Tyler, L. (1997) ‘Liability means never being able to say you're sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraints, and defensiveness in corporate communication’, Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 51–73. · DOI
  55. Wartick, S. (1992) ‘The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation’, Business & Society 31, 33–49.
  56. Weiner, B. (1986) An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion, Springer Verlag, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Weiner, B. (2006) Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Yioutas, J. and Segvic, I. (2003) ‘Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda setting and framing’, Journal and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80 (3), 567–582. · doi:10.1177/107769900308000306

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Coombs, W. T.
Venue
Corporate Reputation Review
Published
2007-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
163-176
ISSN
  • 1363-3589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1889
OpenAlex
W1998511687
Cited by
2,790
References
2
FWCI
56.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.