Cited by 848Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal

Open access
Kensinger, Elizabeth A., Corkin, Suzanne·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Prior investigations have demonstrated that emotional information is often better remembered than neutral information, but they have not directly contrasted effects attributable to valence and those attributable to arousal. By using functional MRI and behavioral studies, we found that distinct cognitive and neural processes contribute to emotional memory enhancement for arousing information versus valenced, nonarousing information. The former depended on an amygdalar-hippocampal network, whereas the latter was supported by a prefrontal cortex-hippocampal network implicated in controlled encoding processes. A behavioral companion study, with a divided-attention paradigm, confirmed that memory enhancement for valenced, nonarousing words relied on controlled encoding processes: concurrent task performance reduced the enhancement effect. Enhancement for arousing words occurred automatically, even when encoding resources were diverted to the secondary task.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0306408101

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01845-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/377295a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/brcg.1997.0929 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.8016 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.162356599 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.3758/BF03332139 · DOI
  7. Dolcos, F., Graham, R., LaBar, K. & Cabeza, R. (2003) Brain Cognit. 51, 221-223.
  8. 10.1038/6404 · DOI
  9. Christianson S.-A. & Engelberg E. (1999) in Handbook of Cognition and Emotion eds. Dalgleish T. & Power M. (Wiley New York).
  10. 10.1006/ccog.1998.0379 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00411.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/35077083 · DOI
  14. Morris, J. S., Ohman, A. & Dolan, R. J. (1998) Nature 409, 467-470.
  15. 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00086-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00494-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/brain/121.7.1239 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.95.3.906 · DOI
  19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-24-11026.2002 · DOI
  20. 10.1037/0735-7044.108.2.353 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1635116100 · DOI
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-11-01242.1981 · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001233 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00157-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.379 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1037/0735-7044.104.4.532 · DOI
  27. McGaugh J. Introini-Collison I. Cahill L. Kim M. & Liang K. (1992) in The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion Memory and Mental Dysfunction ed. Aggleton J. (Wiley-Liss New York) pp. 431-451.
  28. 10.1126/science.287.5451.248 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00467-7 · DOI
  30. Kensinger E. A. & Corkin S. (2004) Mem. Cognit. in press.
  31. 10.3758/CABN.2.3.252 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00001756-200201210-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01214-9 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/1467-9280.00090 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  36. 10.1097/00001756-199811160-00030 · DOI
  37. 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00036-7 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00191-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0777 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/1467-9280.00425 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10836912 · DOI
  44. 10.1006/nimg.1999.0441 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.159 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02407.2003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 726

Metadata

Authors
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S.
Affiliations
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-02-23
Volume
101
Issue
9
Pages
3310-3315
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2054446967
Cited by
848
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 54
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG021525, R01AG021525)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, P41RR014075)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotional memory, valence, arousal, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, divided attention, emotional words, memory enhancement
MeSH terms
Arousal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Nerve Net, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review