The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Open accessAbstract
The articles in this special feature challenge the presumption that scholars can make simple, predictive models of social–ecological systems (SESs) and deduce universal solutions, panaceas, to problems of overuse or destruction of resources. Moving beyond panaceas to develop cumulative capacities to diagnose the problems and potentialities of linked SESs requires serious study of complex, multivariable, nonlinear, cross-scale, and changing systems. Many variables have been identified by researchers as affecting the patterns of interactions and outcomes observed in empirical studies of SESs. A step toward developing a diagnostic method is taken by organizing these variables in a nested, multitier framework. The framework enables scholars to organize analyses of how attributes of ( i ) a resource system (e.g., fishery, lake, grazing area), ( ii ) the resource units generated by that system (e.g., fish, water, fodder), ( iii ) the users of that system, and ( iv ) the governance system jointly affect and are indirectly affected by interactions and resulting outcomes achieved at a particular time and place. The framework also enables us to organize how these attributes may affect and be affected by larger socioeconomic, political, and ecological settings in which they are embedded, as well as smaller ones. The framework is intended to be a step toward building a strong interdisciplinary science of complex, multilevel systems that will enable future diagnosticians to match governance arrangements to specific problems embedded in a social–ecological context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Typically, CHANS are difficult to study because of their non-linearity characteristics, multiple space-time scales, complex feedback mechanisms, and unique local contexts that are linked to forces of globalization.”
From Modelling Tourism in the Galapagos Islands: An Agent-Based Model Approach (2014) · cites this paper as Ostrom 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The collection and evaluation of evidence in our approach is organized according to modes of accumulation identified by the CEQ (1997), including those such as nonlinear and cross-boundary effects that are of widely recognized importance in complex social-ecological systems like the salmon fisheries of the Pacific Northwest (Ostrom 2007).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Ostrom 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The concept of near decomposability has been extended to the analysis of natural resource systems, which are typically conceived as having multiple levels of subsystems that function independently in many respects but are also functionally linked with higher-level and lower-level subsystems within the larger natural resource system (see E. Ostrom, 2007).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as E. Ostrom, 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources
Elinor Ostrom, B., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9739 · Cited by 3,869
Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208 · Cited by 2,254
The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
Ragin, C. C. (2014) · doi:10.1525/9780520957350 · Cited by 2,130
Co-management: concepts and methodological implications
Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008 · Cited by 1,261
Sustainability science: The emerging research program
Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1231333100 · Cited by 1,224
Community-based conservation in a globalized world
Berkes, F. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702098104 · Cited by 1,184
Perrings, C. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701957104 · Cited by 1,158
Globalization, Roving Bandits, and Marine Resources
Berkes, F., Hughes, T. P., Steneck, R. S., Wilson, J. A., Bellwood, D. R., Crona, B., Folke, C., Gunderson, L., Leslie, H. M., Norberg, J., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1122804 · Cited by 745
Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory
Elinor Ostrom, B., & Nagendra, H. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607962103 · Cited by 565
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- 10.2307/3110204 · DOI
- CJ Walters Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources (Macmillan, New York, 1986).
- CJ Walters Conserv Ecol 1, 1 (1997).
- LH Gunderson, CS Holling Panarchy (Island, Washington, DC, 2002).
- CS Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management (Wiley, London, 1978).
- MA Janssen Complexity and Ecosystem Management (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2002). · DOI
- R Epstein Simple Rules for a Complex World (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).
- WC Clark, RW Kates, AH McGowan, TO Riordan Environment 47, i (2005). · DOI
- , eds F Berkes, C Folke (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK Linking Social and Ecological Systems, 1998).
- , eds F Berkes, J Colding, C Folke (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, 2003).
- SR Carpenter, WA Brock Ecol Soc 84, 493–502 (2003).
- P Dasgupta, K-G Mäler Handbook of Development Economics, eds J Behrman, TN Srinavasan (Elsevier, Amsterdam) Vol 3, 2371–2463 (1995).
- KN Lee Compass and Gyroscope (Island, Washington, DC, 1993).
- 10.1007/s100219900037 · DOI · Paper page
- S Levin Fragile Dominion (Perseus, Reading, MA, 1999).
- The Drama of the Commons (Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Change, Natl Acad Press, Washington, DC, 2002).
- R Axelrod, MD Cohen Harnessing Complexity (Basic Books, Reprint Ed, New York, 2001).
- CS Holling, F Berkes, C Folke Linking Social and Ecological Systems, eds F Berkes, C Folke (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 342–362 (1998).
- S Page The Difference (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 2007).
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262240574.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-00622-090108 · DOI
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8 · DOI
- TFH Allen, TW Hoekstra Toward a Unified Ecology (Columbia Univ Press, New York, 1992).
- V Ahl, TFH Allen Hierarchy Theory (Columbia Univ Press, New York, 1996).
- A Koestler Unity Through Diversity, eds W Gray, ND Rizzo (Gordon and Breach, New York), pp. 287–314 (1973).
- JA Wilson The Drama of the Commons, ed ; Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, National Research Council (Natl Acad Press, Washington, DC), pp. 327–359 (2002).
- 10.1017/S1049096500061953 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · DOI
- E Ostrom Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 2005).
- 10.5751/ES-00610-090118 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01531217 · DOI
- Balancing on an Alp (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981).
- B Low, E Ostrom, C Simon, J Wilson Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, eds F Berkes, J Colding, C Folke (Cambridge Univ Press, New York), pp. 83–114 (2003).
- 10.2307/3146531 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.002 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/3292.001.0001 · DOI
- EF Moran People and Nature (Blackwell, Oxford, 2006).
- Decision Making for the Environment (Natl Acad Press, Washington, DC, 2005).
- 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493 · DOI
- C Josse, G Navarro, P Comer, R Evans, D Faber-Langendoen, M Fellows, G Kittel, S Menard, M Pyne, M Reid, et al. Ecological Systems of Latin America and the Caribbean (NatureServe, Arlington, VA, 2003).
- 10.1007/s10745-006-9087-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00055-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00098-7 · DOI
- M Olson Power and Prosperity (Basic Books, New York, 2000).
- 10.1080/08941920590959631 · DOI
- K Kim Korean Soc Public Adm 8, 239 (2006).
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00130-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00082-8 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/3807.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- J Acheson Capturing the Commons (Univ Press of New England, Lebanon, NH, 2003).
- JM Acheson, JA Wilson, RS Steneck Linking Social and Ecological Systems (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 390–413 (1998).
- 10.1016/0308-597X(94)90044-2 · DOI
- R Axelrod The Complexity of Cooperation (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 1997).
- 10.2307/2585925 · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-01319-100121 · DOI
- 10.1080/08941920500323260 · DOI
- SY Tang Rules, Games, & Common-Pool Resources, eds E Ostrom, R Gardner, J Walker (Univ of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 225–246 (1994).
- E Schlager Rules, Games, & Common-Pool Resources, eds E Ostrom, R Gardner, J Walker (Univ of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI), pp. 247–266 (1994).
- AR Poteete, E Ostrom World Dev, in press. (2008).
- WJ McConnell, E Keys Seeing the Forest and the Trees, eds EF Moran, E Ostrom (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 325–354 (2005). · DOI
- A Agrawal, K Redford Poverty, Development and Biodiversity Conservation, Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper No 26 (Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, 2006).
- R Axelrod Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics, eds L Tesfatsion, KL Judd (Elsevier, Amsterdam) Vol 2, 1565–1584 (2006).
- MA Janssen, E Ostrom Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics, eds L Tesfatsion, KL Judd (Elsevier, Amsterdam) Vol 2, 1465–1509 (2006).
- E Brondízio, EF Moran, P Mausel, Y Wu Photogr Eng Remote Sensing 62, 921–929 (1996).
- 10.7551/mitpress/6140.001.0001 · DOI
- C Ragin The Comparative Method (Univ of California Press, Berkeley, 1987).
- C Ragin Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,001
Finkbeiner, E. M. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.009 · Cited by 144
“…systems, placing equal importance on ecological and human domains (Berkes and Folke, 1998; Berkes, 2003; McClanahan et al., 2008a,b; Ostrom, 2007; Wilson, 2006), and recognizing that these systems are intrinsically linked through a variety of feedback mechanisms (Kittinger et al.,…”
BackgroundClimate-related disaster opens a window of opportunity for rural poor in northeastern Honduras
McSweeney, K., & Coomes, O. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014123108 · Cited by 132
“, social capital) long known to be essential for institutional flexibility in the face of environmental change (9, 21, 63, 64).”
BackgroundSocial science in a water observing system
Braden, J. B., Brown, D. G., Dozier, J., Gober, P. A., Hughes, S. M., Maidment, D. R., Schneider, S. L., Schultz, P. W., Shortle, J. S., Swallow, S. K., et al. (2009) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2009wr008216 · Cited by 119
“…[Heyman and Ariely, 2004; Shampanier et al., 2007; Ariely et al., 2009], of the chronic tension between individual self-interest and collective priorities [e.g., Ostrom, 2000], and of the enduring importance of perceptions such as fairness, trust, and entitlement [e.g., Beierle and Konisky, 2000].”
BackgroundAn Evolutionary Perspective on Water Governance: From Understanding to Transformation
Pahl‐Wostl, C. (2017) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-017-1727-1 · Cited by 181
“…standpoints and levels of analysis (local versus international) the leading environmental governance scholars Elinor Ostrom and Oran Young have always embraced complexity and acknowledged the importance of self-organizing processes in governance systems (Ostrom 2005, 2007; Young 2010, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInstitutional Challenges for National Groundwater Governance: Policies and Issues
Theesfeld, I. (2010) · Ground Water · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00624.x · Cited by 131
“The following is motivated by the multitier socioecological framework presented by Ostrom (2007), which provides us, like a guide, with a systematic classification of ecological and social information needed to understand complex systems of natural resource governance.”
BackgroundMethodBosomworth, K., Leith, P., Harwood, A., & Wallis, P. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.007 · Cited by 142
Economic incentives for tourism firms to undertake voluntary environmental management
Blanco, E., Rey-Maquieira, J., & Lozano, J. (2009) · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.007 · Cited by 130
Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research: a review and prospectus
Guerrero, A. M., Bennett, N. J., Wilson, K. A., Carter, N., Gill, D., Mills, M., Ives, C. D., Selinske, M. J., Larrosa, C., Bekessy, S. A., et al. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10232-230338 · Cited by 176
“…of systems involving people and natural resources than focusing only on unidirectional relationships, e.g., the human impacts on nature, ecosystem services, and so forth, or on single-component effects, e.g., biological or socioeconomic impacts on fish stocks (Ostrom 2007, Liu et al. 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAccounting for the Impact of Conservation on Human Well-Being
Milner-Gulland, E., McGregor, J., Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Bevan, P., Clements, T., Daw, T., Homewood, K., Kumpel, N., Lewis, J., et al. (2014) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12277 · Cited by 128
“It is unrealistic to expect to develop standardized metrics that can adequately measure the effects of conservation on drivers and constituents of well-being in a range of locations without consideration of local contexts (Agardy et al. 2003; Ostrom 2007; Mackinnon 2008).”
BackgroundEnvironmental governance theories: a review and application to coastal systems
Partelow, S., Schlüter, A., Armitage, D. R., Bavinck, M., Carlisle, K. M., Gruby, R. L., Hornidge, A., Tissier, M. D. A. L., Pittman, J. B., Song, A. M., et al. (2020) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-12067-250419 · Cited by 205
“Building on Governing the Commons, an entire school studying the commons has emerged (Ostrom 1998, 2007, 2009, Cox et al. 2010, Poteete et al. 2010; https://iasc-commons.org/).”
BackgroundLegal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance
DeCaro, D. A., Chaffin, B. C., Schlager, E. C., Garmestani, A. S., & Ruhl, J. B. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09036-220132 · Cited by 212
Heikkila, T., Schlager, E. C., & Davis, M. W. (2011) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00399.x · Cited by 136
“Second, the design principle actions could be further developed and incorporated within the framework for analyzing a social–ecological system (E. Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundINSTITUTIONS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Elinor Ostrom, B. (2008) · Economic Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.00840.x · Cited by 253
Unintended Feedbacks: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Conservation Effectiveness
Larrosa, C., Carrasco, L. R., & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. (2016) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12240 · Cited by 127
“The framework enables analyses of how attributes of the four core subsystems both affect and are affected by interactions and outcomes via feedbacks at a particular time and place (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundEnhancing the Ostrom social-ecological system framework through formalization
Hinkel, J., Bots, P., & Schlüter, M. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-06475-190351 · Cited by 125
“One prominent effort at developing a framework to analyze SESs in the context of local communities sharing a common resource has been taken by Ostrom and colleagues (Ostrom 2007, 2009, McGinnis and Ostrom 2014).”
BackgroundAfrican community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes
Galvin, K. A., Beeton, T. A., & Luizza, M. W. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10217-230339 · Cited by 167
“While there is no fixed set of governance institutions that are appropriate to effectively govern resources (Ostrom 2007, Andersson and Ostrom 2008), CBC institutions are often exemplified by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private individuals, and layers of government that represent,…”
BackgroundMethodCo‐management in L atin A merican small‐scale shellfisheries: assessment from long‐term case studies
Defeo, O., Castrejón, M., Pérez‐Castañeda, R., Castilla, J. C., Gutiérrez, N. L., Essington, T. E., & Folke, C. (2014) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12101 · Cited by 124
Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective
DeCaro, D. A., & Stokes, M. K. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05837-180440 · Cited by 150
“They see environmental problems as emerging from a complex network of interacting actors; social, political, economic, and biophysical factors; and human governance systems (Young 2002, 2008, Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundBasurto, X. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.011 · Cited by 123
“Notwithstanding explicit warnings that policy solutions found in particular contexts do not constitute panaceas (Ostrom, 2007), conditions for the emergence and robustness of self-governance are often interpreted as necessary conditions or ‘‘blueprints’’ (i.”
BackgroundHinkel, J., Cox, M., Schlüter, M., Binder, C., & Falk, T. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07023-200132 · Cited by 124
“The variable “resource unit mobility” (RU1), for example, is important because mobile resource units such as fish present challenges in establishing ownership, responsibility, and accountability in resource use, which in turn increases the likelihood of overexploitation (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPahl‐Wostl, C., Knieper, C., Lukat, E., Meergans, F., Schoderer, M., Schütze, N., Schweigatz, D., Dombrowsky, I., Lenschow, A., Stein, U., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.011 · Cited by 159
Co-management in fisheries – Experiences and changing approaches in Europe
Linke, S., & Bruckmeier, K. (2015) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.017 · Cited by 123
“critical assessment of prior resource management practices (Acheson, 2006; Ostrom, 2007) with arguments directing resource management towards sustainability.”
BackgroundClimate change adaptation and Integrated Water Resource Management in the water sector
Ludwig, F., van Slobbe, E., & Cofino, W. P. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.010 · Cited by 146
Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries
Essington, T. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907252107 · Cited by 112
“Like most policy tools for sustainable use of natural resources, we shouldnot expect any single instrument to be effective in all instances (1).”
BackgroundInfluentialMuhar, A., Raymond, C., van den Born, R. V. D., Bauer, N., Böck, K., Braito, M., Buijs, A., Flint, C., de Groot, W. D., Ives, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1327424 · Cited by 120
“Prominent examples are the Social-Ecological Systems Framework (Ostrom 2007, 2009) and the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Framework (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003), which included and popularized the Ecosystem Services concept.”
Vignola, R., McDaniels, T. L., & Scholz, R. W. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.004 · Cited by 111
“Informationsharing among organizations is shaped by an existing set of formal and informal institutional structures and governance arrangements that determine the capacity for collective responses to ES degradation problems (Uitto, 1997; Koiman, 1999; Hodge, 2001; Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundDynamics of rules and resources: three new field experiments on water, forests and fisheries
Cárdenas, J.-C., Janssen, M. A., & Bousquet, F. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781781009079.00020 · Cited by 130
“Marwel and Ostrom, Gardner and Walker (1994) for the case of common-pool resources, are probably the most significant seminal works that generated a stream of experimental variations to understand the behavioral and institutional foundations of why would people, despite the clear incentives to free-ride, engage in coo…”
BackgroundInfluentialPolycentric Systems as One Approach for Solving Collective-Action Problems
Ostrom, E. (2008) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1304697 · Cited by 119
Self-citationEklund, J., & Cabeza, M. (2016) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13284 · Cited by 131
Grothmann, T., Grecksch, K., Winges, M., & Siebenhüner, B. (2013) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-13-3369-2013 · Cited by 129
“Broader frameworks for institutional analysis, which often focus on socio-ecological systems (e.g. Folke et al., 2005; Ostrom, 2005, 2007, 2009), also claim – like Gupta et al. (2010) – to be applicable in various institutional settings, but are not focusing – like Gupta et al. (2010) – on climate…”
BackgroundEmbracing thresholds for better environmental management
Kelly, R. P., Erickson, A. L., Mease, L. A., Battista, W., Kittinger, J. N., & Fujita, R. M. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0276 · Cited by 129
“(c) Input variables We used Ostrom’s social–ecological systems governance framework [21,22] to collect and analyse important social, institutional and ecological attributes of our case studies.”
MethodSchlüter, M., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Arlinghaus, R. (2014) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05782-190136 · Cited by 167
“Key Words: dynamic modeling; model development; SES framework; social-ecological modeling; social-ecological processes”
BackgroundMoving beyond panaceas in fisheries governance
Young, O. R., Webster, D. G., Cox, M. E., Raakjær, J., Blaxekjær, L. Ø., Einarsson, N., Virginia, R. A., Acheson, J., Bromley, D. W., Cardwell, E., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716545115 · Cited by 119
“Based in the literature on institutional diagnostics (2, 4, 159, 160), toolkits would not replace existing comprehensive approaches, but would be complementary and could be used in situations where the panacea”
BackgroundDeterminants of Performance of Community-Based Drinking Water Organizations
Madrigal, R., Alpízar, F., & Schlüter, A. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.011 · Cited by 115
“This broad set of variables and outcomes might affect and be affected by the larger socioeconomic, political and ecological setting in which they are embedded (Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWisdom of stakeholder crowds in complex social–ecological systems
Aminpour, P., Gray, S. A., Jetter, A. J. M., Introne, J. E., Singer, A., & Arlinghaus, R. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0467-z · Cited by 145
Messerli, P., Heinimann, A., & Epprecht, M. (2009) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-009-9238-1 · Cited by 103
“As a growing number of factors at multiple spatial scales influence land use and land cover, and as these factors interact in chain-linked or nested ways (Hurni 1996), they produce dissimilar land cover/use outcomes and thereby reinforcing the uniqueness of any local context (Ostrom 2007; Turner et al. 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialValues, images, and principles: What they represent and how they may improve fisheries governance
Song, A. M., Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2013) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.018 · Cited by 117
INSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL LEADERSHIP DIMENSIONS OF CASCADING ECOLOGICAL CRISES
Galaz, V., Moberg, F., Olsson, E., Paglia, E., & Parker, C. F. (2010) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01883.x · Cited by 120
Integrating Perspectives on Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance
Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. R. (2010) · Springer series on environmental management · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_1 · Cited by 110
“2009); and (3) framing governance in the context of a complex adaptive systems approach and dynamics of cross-scale and cross-level interactions (Dietz et al. 2003; Lemos and Agrawal 2006; Cash et al. 2006; Folke 2007; Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundThe Marine Plastic Litter Issue: A Social-Economic Analysis
Abalansa, S., Mahrad, B. E., Vondolia, G. K., Icely, J. D., & Newton, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208677 · Cited by 146
Heterarchies: Reconciling Networks and Hierarchies
Cumming, G. S. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.04.009 · Cited by 126
Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management
Zeitoun, M., Goulden, M. C., & Tickner, D. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.228 · Cited by 124
Yin, R., Yao, S.-B., & Huo, X. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.010 · Cited by 111
Jakob, M., Flachsland, C., Steckel, J. C., & Urpelainen, J. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101775 · Cited by 143
Governing trade‐offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human–wildlife coexistence
Ceaușu, S., Graves, R., Killion, A. K., Svenning, J., & Carter, N. (2019) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13241 · Cited by 110
“Panaceas do not exist for complex problems in social– ecological systems (Ostrom 2007), including systems where humans and wildlife share landscapes.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInstitutions and the performance of coupled infrastructure systems
Anderies, J., Janssen, M., & Schlager, E. C. (2016) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.651 · Cited by 110
“E. Ostrom has referred to this singular focus on rather general ideas for governing social dilemmas as panacea thinking, and has called for the academics and practitioners alike to move beyond it (Ostrom et al., 2007; Ostrom, 2010) and has proposed a framework for doing so (Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundCOLLECTIVE ACTION WITHIN THE HOUSEHOLD: Insights from Natural Resource Management
Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2015) · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.001 · Cited by 109
Putting the "E" in SES: unpacking the ecology in the Ostrom social-ecological system framework
Vogt, J., Epstein, G., Mincey, S. K., Fischer, B. C., & McCord, P. F. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07239-200155 · Cited by 112
Craig, R. K., Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., Arnold, C. A., Birgé, H. E., DeCaro, D. A., Fremier, A. K., Gosnell, H., & Schlager, E. C. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08983-220203 · Cited by 155
Governing agriculture-forest landscapes to achieve climate change mitigation
Agrawal, A., Wollenberg, E. K., & Persha, L. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.001 · Cited by 122
“In a recent paper, Ostrom argued against the common presumption that one can ‘‘make simple, predictive models of social–ecological systems (SESs) and deduce universal solutions, panaceas, to problems of overuse or destruction of resources’’ (Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundSpatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Fischer, B., Meissner, D., Vonortas, N., & Guerrero, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.018 · Cited by 106
Retrospectives: Tragedy of the Commons after 50 Years
Frischmann, B. M., Marciano, A., & Ramello, G. B. (2019) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.33.4.211 · Cited by 131
“5 The Social Ecological Systems (SES) and Governing Knowledge Commons (GKC) Frameworks build upon the IAD framework (Ostrom 2007; Frischmann, Madison, and Strandburg 2014).”
BackgroundDetecting and understanding non-compliance with conservation rules
Solomon, J. N., Gavin, M. C., & Gore, M. L. (2015) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.028 · Cited by 99
An, L., Zvoleff, A., Liu, J.-G., & Axinn, W. (2014) · doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.910085 · Cited by 105
“…has evolved in parallel with many closely related concepts similar to or parts of CHANS, including coupled natural and human (CNH) systems, human–environment systems (Turner et al. 2003), social–ecological systems (SES; Ostrom 2007), and social–environmental systems (Eakin and Luers 2006).”
BackgroundToward a holistic understanding of pastoralism
Manzano, P., Burgas, D., Cadahía, L., Eronen, J., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Bencherif, S., Holand, Ø., Seitsonen, O., Byambaa, B., Fortelius, M., et al. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.012 · Cited by 104
Roy, M., Shemdoe, R., Hulme, D., Mwageni, N., & Gough, A. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.011 · Cited by 104
“Following Douglas (2012), it is an informal settlement as a whole, not the individual UGS within it, which should be regarded as a ‘patch’ - the bottom level unit of what Ostrom (2007) defines as socio-ecological systems (SES).”
BackgroundGelcich, S., Cinner, J., Donlan, C., Tapia-Lewin, S., Godoy, N., & Castilla, J. (2017) · Bulletin of Marine Science · doi:10.5343/bms.2015.1082 · Cited by 104
Elinor Ostrom, B. (2009) · Springer series in game theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_13 · Cited by 137
Self-citationSocial-ecological interactions, management panaceas, and the future of wild fish populations
van Poorten, B. T., Arlinghaus, R., Daedlow, K., & Haertel-Borer, S. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1013919108 · Cited by 104
“z2;tþ1 1⁄4 s5s2 h μ · y2;t þ ð1−hÞz2;t i ; [5]”
Governance and the coastal condition: Towards new modes of observation, adaptation and integration
van Assche, K., Hornidge, A.-K., Schlüter, A., & Văidianu, N. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.002 · Cited by 103
The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene
Cumming, G. S. (2016) · Anthropocene · doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.03.003 · Cited by 128
Governing large-scale social-ecological systems: Lessons from five cases
Fleischman, F. D., Ban, N. C., Evans, L. S., Epstein, G., García-López, G. A., & Villamayor‐Tomás, S. (2014) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.416 · Cited by 98
“As above, successful cases also differ in some key variables reiterating the absence of panacea or one-size-fits-all solutions to environmental governance (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundFrusher, S. D., Hobday, A. J., Jennings, S., Creighton, C., D’Silva, D., Haward, M., Holbrook, N. J., Nursey‐Bray, M., Pecl, G. T., & van Putten, I. E. (2013) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-013-9325-7 · Cited by 102
“Using a series of case studies, we identify key strategies that may be successfully employed in other regions, highlight challenges in undertaking this research, and note productive and strategic future directions for adaptation studies in marine hotspots.”
BackgroundReflections on “Some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation”
Elinor Ostrom, B. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.49 · Cited by 105
Self-citationFeminist political ecologies of the commons and commoning (Editorial to the Special Feature)
Clement, F., Harcourt, W., Joshi, D., & Sato, C. (2019) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.972 · Cited by 102
“Whereas scholars from the Bloomington School have studied variables that represent power distribution such as the socioeconomic attributes of actors and knowledge of social-ecological systems (SES) (Ostrom 2007), they have not explicitly considered power as a variable of interest.”
BackgroundLeenhardt, P., Teneva, L. T., Kininmonth, S., Darling, E. S., Cooley, S. R., & Claudet, J. (2015) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018 · Cited by 133
Shifting Cultivation and Fire Policy: Insights from the Brazilian Amazon
Carmenta, R., Vermeylen, S., Parry, L., & Barlow, J. (2013) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9600-1 · Cited by 97
“2010) and simple policy panaceas are ill-advised (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundSocioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies
Pauliuk, S., & Hertwich, E. G. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.012 · Cited by 141
Approaching moisture recycling governance
Keys, P. W., Wang‐Erlandsson, L., Gordon, L. J., Galaz, V., & Ebbesson, J. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.007 · Cited by 107
Roadmap to a One Health agenda 2030.
Queenan, K., Garnier, J., Nielsen, L. R., Buttiġieġ, S. C., Meneghi, D. D., Holmberg, M., Zinsstag, J., Rüegg, S. R., Häsler, B., & Kock, R. A. (2017) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr201712014 · Cited by 130
“These systems relate outcomes (which can also be outcomes of health and wellbeing) to systemic interactions, which are primarily influenced by resources, governance and users in a given social, economic and political setting and related ecosystems as part of ‘New institutional economics’ [42].”
BackgroundMethodSocietal systems – Complex or worse?
Andersson, C., Törnberg, A., & Törnberg, P. (2014) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.07.003 · Cited by 110
Diagnosing transformative change in urban water systems: Theories and frameworks
Ferguson, B. C., Brown, R. R., & Deletić, A. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.008 · Cited by 104
Management Decentralization and Montane Forest Conditions in Tanzania
Persha, L., & Blomley, T. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01276.x · Cited by 99
“But translating empirical evidence of elements associated with institutional success into effective forest policies and implementation remains a substantial challenge (Agrawal 2007; Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundGoverning large-scale marine commons: Contextual challenges in the Coral Triangle
Fidelman, P. I. J., Evans, L. S., Fabinyi, M., Foale, S. J., Cinner, J. E., & Rosen, F. (2011) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.007 · Cited by 115
“8 markings are other notable attributes that will influence governance [55].”
BackgroundUnderstanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project.
Cox, M. (2014) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/ijc.406 · Cited by 97
“Our conceptualization of SESs has been inspired by a framework proposed by Ostrom (2007, 2009).”
MethodAssessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach
Forster, J., Barkmann, J., Fricke, R., Hotes, S., Kleyer, M., Kobbe, S., Kübler, D., Rumbaur, C., Siegmund-Schultze, M., Seppelt, R., et al. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07804-200331 · Cited by 98
“Land use is then the result of this complex human-ecosystem interaction which is described as social-ecological system (SES; Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundMapping social-ecological systems to understand the challenges underlying wildlife management
Dressel, S., Ericsson, G., & Sandström, C. (2018) · Environmental Science and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.007 · Cited by 97
“…into panacea traps due to incorrect assumptions; notably that all resource governance problems can be represented by a small set of simple models and that most resource users have the same preferences and perceptions (del Mar Delgado-Serrano and Ramos, 2015; Ostrom, 2007; Ostrom et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHolahan, R., & Lubell, M. N. (2016) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781782548508.00010 · Cited by 36
“As E. Ostrom (2007) warned, however, there are no panacea governance arrangements that work at all times in all places.”
BackgroundPlace, well-being, and fairness shape priorities for adaptation to climate change
Adger, W. (2016) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.009 · Cited by 97
Lin, B. B., Chappell, M. J., Vandermeer, J. H., Smith, G., Quintero, E., Kerr, R. B., Griffith, D. M., Ketcham, S., Latta, S. C., McMichael, P., et al. (2011) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20116020 · Cited by 130
“[102, 108]), there are few if any ‘one size fits all’ approaches.”
BackgroundAn Outcome-Oriented, Social–Ecological Framework for Assessing Protected Area Effectiveness
Ghoddousi, A., Loos, J., & Kuemmerle, T. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab114 · Cited by 111
“Building on this theoretical framework, a social–ecological perspective should therefore help to design, structure, and implement more holistic and systematic assessments of protected area effectiveness (Ostrom 2007, Cumming and Allen 2017, Mascia et al.”
BackgroundDiagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change
Oberlack, C. (2016) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z · Cited by 127
“1 can be characterised in more detail by decomposing them into sub-categories so that lower-tier variables are sub-classes of higher-tier variables (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundWolf, M. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.018 · Cited by 96
“…by the application of systemic approaches (Leischow et al., 2008), which are sensitive of social and environmental contexts and which understand health as a “quantitative and qualitative interaction and outcome process in socialeecological systems” (Zinstag et al., 2011, p. 153; Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundGarrett, K., Dobson, A. D. M., Kroschel, J., Natarajan, B., Orlandini, S., Tonnang, H., & Valdivia, C. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.04.018 · Cited by 95
McCord, P. F., Dell’Angelo, J., Baldwin, E., & Evans, T. P. (2016) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12168 · Cited by 116
“First elaborated in E. Ostrom (2007), the SES framework seeks to identify components of and interactions between resource systems, resource units, actors, and governance systems in producing social-ecological outcomes (McGinnis & Ostrom, 2014).”
BackgroundFleischman, F. D., Boenning, K., García-López, G. A., Mincey, S. K., Schmitt-Harsh, M., Daedlow, K., López, M. C., Basurto, X., Fischer, B., & Elinor Ostrom, B. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03512-150409 · Cited by 85
Self-citationRissman, A., & Gillon, S. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12250 · Cited by 94
“Although some SES frameworks are designed to diagnose opportunities and obstacles for increasing sustainability (Ostrom 2007), it is not clear whether SES articles with both ecological and social variables are more likely to make recommendations.”
BackgroundMathevet, R., Thompson, J. D., Folke, C., & Chapin, F. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/14-0421 · Cited by 94
Ecosystem services in the Arctic: a thematic review
Malinauskaite, L., Cook, D., Davíðsdóttir, B., Ögmundardóttir, H., & Roman, J. (2019) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100898 · Cited by 93
“Scale and context are of great importance here as panaceas are rarely effective in environmental governance (Ostrom, 2007; Young et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGurney, G. G., Cinner, J. E., Sartin, J., Pressey, R. L., Ban, N. C., Marshall, N., & Prabuning, D. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.015 · Cited by 106
Making Ostrom’s framework applicable to characterise social ecological systems at the local level
Serrano, M. D. M. D., & Ramos, P. (2015) · doi:10.18352/ijc.567 · Cited by 93
“Ostrom (2007, 2009) proposed a framework to analyse the sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems (SES) that integrated the efforts of many scholars over years to develop an integrative and multidisciplinary approach to understand complex interactions within different systems and scales around…”
BackgroundInstitutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA
Chaffin, B. C., Garmestani, A. S., Gosnell, H., & Craig, R. K. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.008 · Cited by 105
“While there is no panacea for resource allocation conflicts (Ostrom, 2007), nor is there a utopian path toward resource sustainability, the normative concept of governance is useful as it emphasizes state and non-state processes for negotiating tradeoffs and resolving conflicting demands on…”
BackgroundApplying a Social-Ecological System Framework to the Study of the Taos Valley Irrigation System
Cox, M. E. (2014) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-014-9651-y · Cited by 115
“This complexity and interconnectedness would argue against the highly simplified approaches to environmental and development policy analysis that have persisted in scholarship and practice (Ostrom 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialContext matters to explain field experiments: Results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages
Castillo, D., Bousquet, F., Janssen, M. A., Worrapimphong, K., & Cárdenas, J.-C. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.011 · Cited by 94
“The aim of this paper is to provide meaningful insights for improving the understanding about the relations between broader context variables (Ostrom, 2007, 2009; Poteete et al., 2010), and individual and collective behavior as consequence or cause of rules in artisanal fishery systems.”
BackgroundPartelow, S., & Nelson, K. M. (2020) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.004 · Cited by 91
Biggs, R., Rhode, C., Archibald, S. A., Kunene, L. M., Mutanga, S. S., Nkuna, N., Ocholla, P. O., & Phadima, L. J. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07380-200152 · Cited by 101
“…face of uncertainty, drawing especially on the body of work associated with the resilience approach (Gunderson and Holling 2002, Berkes et al. 2003, Walker and Salt 2006, 2012, Westley et al. 2006, Armitage et al. 2007, Ostrom 2007, Norberg and Cumming 2008, Chapin et al. 2009, Biggs et al. 2015).”
BackgroundIwamura, T., Lambin, E., Silvius, K., Luzar, J. B., & Fragoso, J. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.008 · Cited by 91
“Sustainability, however, hinges on the feedbacks and balances between social and ecological systems, and should be investigated with a holistic framework (Ostrom, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialYin, R., & Zhao, M.-J. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.003 · Cited by 91
The impact of culture and ecology on cooperation in a common-pool resource experiment
Prediger, S., Vollan, B., & Frölich, M. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.017 · Cited by 87
Miller, K. A., Charles, A. T., Barangé, M., Brander, K., Gallucci, V. F., Gasalla, M. A., Khan, A. S., Munro, G. R., Murtugudde, R. G., Ommer, R. E., et al. (2010) · Progress In Oceanography · doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2010.09.014 · Cited by 96
“…differences in technology, motivations and identity – for example, as members of a coherent place-based community, as ‘‘roving bandits” (Berkes et al., 2006), or as participants in a mobile, but well-regulated industrial fishery (Ostrom, 2007; Chuenpagdee and Jentoft, 2009; Ommer et al., 2009).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrom, E.
- Affiliations
- Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University, 408 North Indiana Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408; Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, 513 North Park, Bloomington, IN 47408; and Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2007-09-25
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 15181-15187
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2000497
- OpenAlex
- W2071962320
- Cited by
- 2,728
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 109 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 167 · 2021: 209 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 158 · 2018: 197 · 2017: 156 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 168 · 2014: 168 · 2013: 165 · 2012: 135
- FWCI
- 60.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Ford Foundation
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Keywords
- social-ecological systems, panacea, diagnostic framework, multilevel systems, governance arrangements, resource utilization (natural resources), nonlinear interactions, cross-scale analysis, resource degradation, interdisciplinary research, fisheries, lake ecosystems, grazing systems
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecology, Environment, Environmental Health, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollution, Humans, Models, Biological, Public Policy, Social Environment, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review