Cited by 207CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesClimate Change and Geoengineering

Carbon Dioxide Efficiency of Terrestrial Enhanced Weathering

Moosdorf, Nils, Renforth, Phil, Hartmann, Jens·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Terrestrial enhanced weathering, the spreading of ultramafic silicate rock flour to enhance natural weathering rates, has been suggested as part of a strategy to reduce global atmospheric CO2 levels. We budget potential CO2 sequestration against associated CO2 emissions to assess the net CO2 removal of terrestrial enhanced weathering. We combine global spatial data sets of potential source rocks, transport networks, and application areas with associated CO2 emissions in optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. The results show that the choice of source rocks and material comminution technique dominate the CO2 efficiency of enhanced weathering. CO2 emissions from transport amount to on average 0.5-3% of potentially sequestered CO2. The emissions of material mining and application are negligible. After accounting for all emissions, 0.5-1.0 t CO2 can be sequestered on average per tonne of rock, translating into a unit cost from 1.6 to 9.9 GJ per tonne CO2 sequestered by enhanced weathering. However, to control or reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations substantially with enhanced weathering would require very large amounts of rock. Before enhanced weathering could be applied on large scales, more research is needed to assess weathering rates, potential side effects, social acceptability, and mechanisms of governance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es4052022

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [12]12. Kempe, S., Carbon in the rock cycle. In The Global Carbon Cycle , Bolin, B.; Degens, E. 379 380 T.; Kempe, S.; Ketner, P., Eds. Scientific Committee On Problems of the Environment (SCOPE): - Old Woking, 1979; Vol. 13, pp 343-375. 381
  2. [43]43. Kelemen, P. B.; Matter, J., In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage. Proceedings 463 464 of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 17300. 465
  3. [3]3. edition, 1:5,000,000 In Commission for the Geological World Map: 2010. 467
  4. [6]6. Element Geochemistry, and Os Isotope and PGE Systematics. Journal of Petrology 2010, 51 , (1470

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moosdorf, N., Renforth, P., & Hartmann, J.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Moosdorf, Nils
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
4809-4816
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2018921467
Cited by
207
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
CO2 sequestration, carbon dioxide removal, ultramafic rocks, transport emissions, geoengineering, atmospheric CO2 reduction
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Weather, Silicates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review