Cited by 190Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance

Open access
Schreiweis, Christiane, Bornschein, Ulrich, Burguière, Eric, Kerimoglu, Cemil, Schreiter, Sven, Dannemann, Michael, Goyal, Shubhi, Rea, Ellis +10 more·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The acquisition of language and speech is uniquely human, but how genetic changes might have adapted the nervous system to this capacity is not well understood. Two human-specific amino acid substitutions in the transcription factor forkhead box P2 (FOXP2) are outstanding mechanistic candidates, as they could have been positively selected during human evolution and as FOXP2 is the sole gene to date firmly linked to speech and language development. When these two substitutions are introduced into the endogenous Foxp2 gene of mice (Foxp2(hum)), cortico-basal ganglia circuits are specifically affected. Here we demonstrate marked effects of this humanization of Foxp2 on learning and striatal neuroplasticity. Foxp2(hum/hum) mice learn stimulus-response associations faster than their WT littermates in situations in which declarative (i.e., place-based) and procedural (i.e., response-based) forms of learning could compete during transitions toward proceduralization of action sequences. Striatal districts known to be differently related to these two modes of learning are affected differently in the Foxp2(hum/hum) mice, as judged by measures of dopamine levels, gene expression patterns, and synaptic plasticity, including an NMDA receptor-dependent form of long-term depression. These findings raise the possibility that the humanized Foxp2 phenotype reflects a different tuning of corticostriatal systems involved in declarative and procedural learning, a capacity potentially contributing to adapting the human brain for speech and language acquisition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1414542111

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cortico-striatal circuitry mediates speech and language in humans.

    “These findings suggest that the cortico-striatal circuitry mediates speech and language in humans (Enard et al., 2009; Fujita et al., 2008; Schreiweis et al., 2014; Shu et al., 2005).”

    From Genetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Schreiweis et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreiweis, C., Bornschein, U., Burguière, E., Kerimoglu, C., Schreiter, S., Dannemann, M., Goyal, S., Rea, E., French, C. A., Puliyadi, R., Groszer, M., Fisher, S. E., Mundry, R., Winter, C., Hevers, W., Pääbo, S., Enard, W., & Graybiel, A. M.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
111
Issue
39
Pages
14253-14258
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2016974947
Cited by
190
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (075491, 080971, 075491/Z/04,)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060379)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
FOXP2, declarative learning, procedural learning, cortico-basal ganglia circuits, dopamine, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Skills, Recombinant Proteins, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Species Specificity, Maze Learning, Amino Acid Substitution, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review