Cited by 539Cellular transport and secretionProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 27 of the 50 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Localized Biphasic Changes in Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate at Sites of Phagocytosis

Open access

Abstract

Phagocytosis requires localized and transient remodeling of actin filaments. Phosphoinositide signaling is believed to play an important role in cytoskeletal organization, but it is unclear whether lipids, which can diffuse along the membrane, can mediate the focal actin assembly required for phagocytosis. We used imaging of fluorescent chimeras of pleckstrin homology and C1 domains in live macrophages to monitor the distribution of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (4,5-PIP2) and diacylglycerol, respectively, during phagocytosis. Our results reveal a sequence of exquisitely localized, coordinated steps in phospholipid metabolism: a focal, rapid accumulation of 4,5-PIP2 accompanied by recruitment of type Iα phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase to the phagosomal cup, followed by disappearance of the phosphoinositide as the phagosome seals. Loss of 4,5-PIP2 correlated with mobilization of phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ) and with the localized formation of diacylglycerol. The presence of 4,5-PIP2 and active PLCγ at the phagosome was shown to be essential for effective particle ingestion. The temporal sequence of phosphoinositide metabolism suggests that accumulation of 4,5-PIP2 is involved in the initial recruitment of actin to the phagocytic cup, while its degradation contributes to the subsequent cytoskeletal remodeling.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In live RAW macrophages, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (4,5-PIP2) monitored with PLCδ-PH-GFP undergoes a localized biphasic change during FcγR-mediated phagocytosis: accumulation at the phagocytic cup followed by loss as the phagosome seals. This is accompanied by PIPKIα recruitment, PLCγ mobilization, and local diacylglycerol production, and interfering with PIP2 or PLCγ impairs particle ingestion.

Key findings

  • PLCδ-PH-GFP accumulated in phagocytic cups and then dissociated from sealed phagosomes; peak phagosomal-cup intensity was 1.3–2.3× plasma membrane, mean 1.61 ± 0.08 (n = 64), significantly greater than PM-GFP (mean 1.25 ± 0.08, n = 35; P < 0.005).
  • PIPKIα transiently concentrated at nascent phagosomes and dissociated after completion; PLCγ2 and PLCγ-SH2-GFP concentrated at phagocytic cups, and the DAG probe C1δ-YFP was recruited as PIP2 disappeared, strongest immediately after phagosome closure.
  • Reducing PIP2 availability inhibited phagocytosis: neomycin at 5 and 10 mM reduced the phagocytic index by 30 ± 8% and 45 ± 5% (n = 15, P < 0.001); PLCδ-PH-GFP overexpression reduced it by 30 ± 2% (n = 12, P < 0.0001); PM-5′-phosphatase-GFP reduced it by 42 ± 2% (n = 12, P < 0.0001).
  • PLC inhibition blocked phagocytosis and actin-cup/pseudopod formation: U73122 had half-maximal effects at ≈3 μM, ET-18-OCH3 at ≈25 μM, and dominant-negative PLCγ constructs (PLCγ-SH2-GFP or PLCz) reduced the phagocytic index by >50% (n = 12, P < 0.0001).

Methods

  • Live-cell confocal imaging of RAW 264.7 macrophages transiently transfected with GFP/CFP/YFP chimeras: PLCδ-PH for 4,5-PIP2, C1δ for DAG, PM-GFP, PM-5′-phosphatase-GFP, PLCγ-SH2-GFP, and PLCz.
  • Phagocytosis assays used IgG-opsonized sheep RBCs, zymosan, or 8-μm latex beads; phagocytic index was estimated by DIC microscopy, with synchronized binding on ice followed by warming. Immunofluorescence was used for PIPKIα and PLCγ2, and SEM/TEM for pseudopod morphology.
  • Main analysis was confocal microscopy with fluorescence quantitation by line scanning and t tests; pharmacological inhibitors included neomycin, U73122/U73343, and ET-18-OCH3.

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors note that PLCγ-SH2-GFP or PLCz could bind phosphotyrosine groups unrelated to those that anchor PLCγ, so the dominant-negative specificity is not absolute.
  • Stated: the PM-5′-phosphatase-GFP effect may not be entirely attributable to phosphatase activity, since PM-GFP alone produced a modest, reproducible inhibition of phagocytosis, possibly by displacing acylated Src family kinases.
  • Evident: conclusions rely on fluorescent lipid-binding probes and pharmacological inhibitors rather than direct lipid measurements; PLCδ-PH has measurable low-affinity binding to 3′-phosphorylated inositides in vitro, and DAG effects may involve C1-domain proteins other than PKC.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.151.7.1353

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Distribution of PLCδ-PH-GFP, Akt-PH-GFP, and PM-GFP in RAW macrophages. RAW cells were transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP (A and B), Akt-PH-GFP (C and D), and PM-GFP (E and F). Shown are representative cells before (A, C, and E) and after 10 min incubation in the presence of 10 μM ionomycin in medium containing 1.2 mM calcium (B, D, and F). Bar, 10 μm.
Figure 1 Distribution of PLCδ-PH-GFP, Akt-PH-GFP, and PM-GFP in RAW macrophages. RAW cells were transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP (A and B), Akt-PH-GFP (C and D), and PM-GFP (E and F). Shown are representative cells before (A, C, and E) and after 10 min incubation in the presence of 10 μM ionomycin in medium containing 1.2 mM calcium (B, D, and F). Bar, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Distribution of PLCδ-PH-GFP during phagocytosis. Macrophages expressing PLCδ-PH-GFP were exposed to IgG-opsonized particles to induce phagocytosis. (A–C) Phagocytosis of RBCs. First panel is DIC image corresponding to the fluorescence image at t = 0 min. Subscripts (e.g., A0) refer to the time in minutes at which the fluorescence images were captured. The times refer to the onset of recording, not to the time of addition of RBCs. Open arrows point to nascent phagosomes and solid white arrows show formed phagosomes. B and C are enlargements of the areas identified by boxes in A4 and A6. (D) Phagocytosis of 8-μm latex beads. (E) Corresponding DIC image. Nascent and formed phagosomes are indicated by open and filled circles, respectively, in B–E. (F and G) Macrophages expressing PLCδ-PH-GFP (F) were allowed to initiate phagocytosis of RBCs, followed by fixation and staining for F-actin with rhodamine-phalloidin (G). Open arrows point to phagocytic cups while the small filled white circles indicate formed phagosomes. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 2 Distribution of PLCδ-PH-GFP during phagocytosis. Macrophages expressing PLCδ-PH-GFP were exposed to IgG-opsonized particles to induce phagocytosis. (A–C) Phagocytosis of RBCs. First panel is DIC image corresponding to the fluorescence image at t = 0 min. Subscripts (e.g., A0) refer to the time in minutes at which the fluorescence images were captured. The times refer to the onset of recording, not to the time of addition of RBCs. Open arrows point to nascent phagosomes and solid white arrows show formed phagosomes. B and C are enlargements of the areas identified by boxes in A4 and A6. (D) Phagocytosis of 8-μm latex beads. (E) Corresponding DIC image. Nascent and formed phagosomes are indicated by open and filled circles, respectively, in B–E. (F and G) Macrophages expressing PLCδ-PH-GFP (F) were allowed to initiate phagocytosis of RBCs, followed by fixation and staining for F-actin with rhodamine-phalloidin (G). Open arrows point to phagocytic cups while the small filled white circles indicate formed phagosomes. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Phagocytosis in macrophages expressing PM-GFP. (A) DIC image and time course of phagocytosis, as described in the legend to Fig. 2 A. (B and C) Enlargements of the areas identified by boxes in A0 and A6. (D) Phagocytosis of 8-μm latex beads. (E) Corresponding DIC image. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 3 Phagocytosis in macrophages expressing PM-GFP. (A) DIC image and time course of phagocytosis, as described in the legend to Fig. 2 A. (B and C) Enlargements of the areas identified by boxes in A0 and A6. (D) Phagocytosis of 8-μm latex beads. (E) Corresponding DIC image. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Quantification of phagosomal fluorescence. Confocal images of RAW cells undertaking phagocytosis were acquired as in the legends to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The digitized fluorescence intensity was quantified along line scans traversing both a phagosomal cup (x) and the contralateral plasma membrane (y). Representative images and corresponding quantitations are illustrated. (A and B) Cell transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP. (C and D) Cell transfected with PM-GFP. (E) Ratio of the fluorescence at the phagosomal cup to the plasmalemma (two leftmost bars) or of the membrane of sealed phagosomes to the plasmalemma (two rightmost bars). The PLCδ-PH-GFP fluorescence of sealed phagosomes was negligible, yielding a ratio of ≈0. Means ± SE of 35, 64, 63, and 14 determinations, from left to right. (F) Distribution of PIPKIα during phagocytosis of Texas red–labeled zymosan particles (shown in G). Open arrow, nascent phagosome. Solid arrow, sealed phagosome. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 4 Quantification of phagosomal fluorescence. Confocal images of RAW cells undertaking phagocytosis were acquired as in the legends to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. The digitized fluorescence intensity was quantified along line scans traversing both a phagosomal cup (x) and the contralateral plasma membrane (y). Representative images and corresponding quantitations are illustrated. (A and B) Cell transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP. (C and D) Cell transfected with PM-GFP. (E) Ratio of the fluorescence at the phagosomal cup to the plasmalemma (two leftmost bars) or of the membrane of sealed phagosomes to the plasmalemma (two rightmost bars). The PLCδ-PH-GFP fluorescence of sealed phagosomes was negligible, yielding a ratio of ≈0. Means ± SE of 35, 64, 63, and 14 determinations, from left to right. (F) Distribution of PIPKIα during phagocytosis of Texas red–labeled zymosan particles (shown in G). Open arrow, nascent phagosome. Solid arrow, sealed phagosome. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Sequestration and degradation of 4,5-PIP2 attenuates phagocytosis. (A) Phagocytosis was quantified as described in Materials and Methods in RAW cells treated as follows (from left to right): control (untreated/untransfected); preincubated overnight with 5 or 10 mM neomycin sulfate; transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP; transfected with GFP; transfected with PM-5′-phosphatase-GFP; transfected with PM-GFP. The phagocytic index was normalized to that of controls performed the same day. Data are means ± SE of 1,200 cells per condition. (B) Estimation of the concentration of PLCδ-PH-GFP expressed by RAW macrophages. To construct a calibration curve, droplets of solutions of recombinant EGFP at varying concentrations were placed under mineral oil and analyzed by confocal microscopy. The corresponding fluorescence is plotted versus EGFP concentration (squares). Cells transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP were treated with ionomycin as in the legend to Fig. 1 and confocal images were acquired. Mean fluorescence of three experiments, each with ≥25 cells, is shown (circles with error bars representing SEM).
Figure 7 Sequestration and degradation of 4,5-PIP2 attenuates phagocytosis. (A) Phagocytosis was quantified as described in Materials and Methods in RAW cells treated as follows (from left to right): control (untreated/untransfected); preincubated overnight with 5 or 10 mM neomycin sulfate; transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP; transfected with GFP; transfected with PM-5′-phosphatase-GFP; transfected with PM-GFP. The phagocytic index was normalized to that of controls performed the same day. Data are means ± SE of 1,200 cells per condition. (B) Estimation of the concentration of PLCδ-PH-GFP expressed by RAW macrophages. To construct a calibration curve, droplets of solutions of recombinant EGFP at varying concentrations were placed under mineral oil and analyzed by confocal microscopy. The corresponding fluorescence is plotted versus EGFP concentration (squares). Cells transfected with PLCδ-PH-GFP were treated with ionomycin as in the legend to Fig. 1 and confocal images were acquired. Mean fluorescence of three experiments, each with ≥25 cells, is shown (circles with error bars representing SEM).CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Distribution of PLCγ during phagocytosis. (A) Distribution of PLCγ2 during phagocytosis of Texas red–labeled zymosan particles (shown in B). (C) Distribution of PLCγ1-SH2-GFP during phagocytosis of RBCs (shown in D). Arrows in A–D point to nascent phagosomes. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 5 Distribution of PLCγ during phagocytosis. (A) Distribution of PLCγ2 during phagocytosis of Texas red–labeled zymosan particles (shown in B). (C) Distribution of PLCγ1-SH2-GFP during phagocytosis of RBCs (shown in D). Arrows in A–D point to nascent phagosomes. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Distribution of C1δ-YFP and PLCδ-PH-CFP during phagocytosis. (A–C) Representative cells expressing C1δ-GFP or C1δ-YFP immediately before (A) and 10 min after addition of 10 μM ionomycin (B), or after treatment with 200 nM TPA for 10 min at 15°C (C). (D) Confocal fluorescence images of RAW cells coexpressing C1δ-YFP (yellow) and PLCδ-PH-CFP (blue) undergoing phagocytosis of RBCs. Subscripts (e.g., D1) refer to the time in minutes at which the fluorescence images were captured. D1, D3.5, D6, and D7.5 show overlays of the PLCδ-PH-CFP and C1δ-YFP signals. The insets show separately the fluorescence of PLCδ-PH-CFP (labeled C) and C1δ-YFP (labeled Y) of the areas boxed by the dotted line. In D1 and D3.5, three formed phagosomes are indicated with filled white circles. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 6 Distribution of C1δ-YFP and PLCδ-PH-CFP during phagocytosis. (A–C) Representative cells expressing C1δ-GFP or C1δ-YFP immediately before (A) and 10 min after addition of 10 μM ionomycin (B), or after treatment with 200 nM TPA for 10 min at 15°C (C). (D) Confocal fluorescence images of RAW cells coexpressing C1δ-YFP (yellow) and PLCδ-PH-CFP (blue) undergoing phagocytosis of RBCs. Subscripts (e.g., D1) refer to the time in minutes at which the fluorescence images were captured. D1, D3.5, D6, and D7.5 show overlays of the PLCδ-PH-CFP and C1δ-YFP signals. The insets show separately the fluorescence of PLCδ-PH-CFP (labeled C) and C1δ-YFP (labeled Y) of the areas boxed by the dotted line. In D1 and D3.5, three formed phagosomes are indicated with filled white circles. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 8 PLC is required for phagocytosis. (A–C) Macrophages expressing C1δ-GFP were pretreated with 6 μM U73122 (A) or U73343 (C) and subsequently allowed to interact with opsonized RBCs. B is a DIC image corresponding to A, showing adherent RBCs (arrowheads). In C, open arrowhead points to nascent phagosome, solid arrowhead to sealed phagosome. (D and E) RAW cells were pretreated for 15 min with the indicated concentrations of either U73343 (D, filled symbols), U73122 (D, open symbols), or ET-18-OCH3 (E) and phagocytosis was measured in the presence of the drugs. Data are means ± SE of three experiments (200 cells counted in each). (F) Phagocytosis was quantified in RAW cells treated as follows (from left to right): control (untransfected); transfected with the SH2 domains of PLCγ1; transfected with PLCz and GFP; transfected with GFP alone. The phagocytic index was normalized to that of controls performed the same day. Data are means ± SE of at least 1,200 cells per condition.
Figure 8 PLC is required for phagocytosis. (A–C) Macrophages expressing C1δ-GFP were pretreated with 6 μM U73122 (A) or U73343 (C) and subsequently allowed to interact with opsonized RBCs. B is a DIC image corresponding to A, showing adherent RBCs (arrowheads). In C, open arrowhead points to nascent phagosome, solid arrowhead to sealed phagosome. (D and E) RAW cells were pretreated for 15 min with the indicated concentrations of either U73343 (D, filled symbols), U73122 (D, open symbols), or ET-18-OCH3 (E) and phagocytosis was measured in the presence of the drugs. Data are means ± SE of three experiments (200 cells counted in each). (F) Phagocytosis was quantified in RAW cells treated as follows (from left to right): control (untransfected); transfected with the SH2 domains of PLCγ1; transfected with PLCz and GFP; transfected with GFP alone. The phagocytic index was normalized to that of controls performed the same day. Data are means ± SE of at least 1,200 cells per condition.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Effect of U73122 on pseudopod extension and actin cup formation. (A and B) RAW cells were treated without (A, C, and D) or with 5 μM U73122 (B, E, and F), allowed to bind RBCs on ice, and then warmed up for 4 min to initiate phagocytosis. The cells were then fixed and analyzed by SEM (A and B) or stained with rhodamine-phalloidin and analyzed by confocal microscopy (C–F). Arrows point to adherent RBCs. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 9 Effect of U73122 on pseudopod extension and actin cup formation. (A and B) RAW cells were treated without (A, C, and D) or with 5 μM U73122 (B, E, and F), allowed to bind RBCs on ice, and then warmed up for 4 min to initiate phagocytosis. The cells were then fixed and analyzed by SEM (A and B) or stained with rhodamine-phalloidin and analyzed by confocal microscopy (C–F). Arrows point to adherent RBCs. Bars, 10 μm.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Lipid signaling and actin redistribution during phagocytosis. (A) Putative events mediating 4,5-PIP2 metabolism at the nascent phagosome. (B) Diagrammatic representation of the sequence of events during phagosome formation and internalization. The font size is indicative of the relative abundance of the components (e.g., more 4,5-PIP2 at the phagosomal cup than in the plasmalemma during formation). Note that: (a) actin and 4,5-PIP2 are enriched in the phagosomal cup during formation; (b) DAG appears during formation, but is most abundant shortly after completion of phagocytosis (Early stage); (c) neither 4,5-PIP2 nor DAG are detectable in “late” phagosomes (Late stage); (d) phagosomal actin decreases in parallel with or shortly after 4,5-PIP2; (e) 4,5-PIP2 is present at the nonphagosomal plasma membrane throughout the phagocytic process; and (f) we postulate that PLC activity is required to induce actin disassembly and remodeling during cup formation and phagosomal closure.
Figure 10 Lipid signaling and actin redistribution during phagocytosis. (A) Putative events mediating 4,5-PIP2 metabolism at the nascent phagosome. (B) Diagrammatic representation of the sequence of events during phagosome formation and internalization. The font size is indicative of the relative abundance of the components (e.g., more 4,5-PIP2 at the phagosomal cup than in the plasmalemma during formation). Note that: (a) actin and 4,5-PIP2 are enriched in the phagosomal cup during formation; (b) DAG appears during formation, but is most abundant shortly after completion of phagocytosis (Early stage); (c) neither 4,5-PIP2 nor DAG are detectable in “late” phagosomes (Late stage); (d) phagosomal actin decreases in parallel with or shortly after 4,5-PIP2; (e) 4,5-PIP2 is present at the nonphagosomal plasma membrane throughout the phagocytic process; and (f) we postulate that PLC activity is required to induce actin disassembly and remodeling during cup formation and phagosomal closure.CC BY-NC-SA · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

64 Own result · 35 Own interpretation · 13 Partly supported · 8 No full text of the sources · 3 Supported so far · 2 Supported · 1 Sources not found · 1 Not checked yet · 1 Own method · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 88 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At 15°C, vesicular traffic essentially ceases in mammalian cells.

    “since at this temperature vesicular traffic essentially ceases in mammalian cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neomycin sulfate can compete with endogenous ligands for binding to 4,5-PIP2.

    “Neomycin sulfate is a somewhat permeant divalent cation that can compete with endogenous ligands for binding to 4,5-PIP2.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In resting cells, the C1 domain of PKCγ is almost exclusively in the cytosol.

    “In resting cells this domain is almost exclusively in the cytosol, ruling out translocation by vesicular fusion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    4,5-PIP2 exists in the micromolar range in cells.

    “which can be estimated to exist in the micromolar range, based on existing determinations of phospholipid content in several cell types.”
4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Botelho, R. J., Teruel, M., Dierckman, R., Anderson, R., Wells, A., York, J. D., Meyer, T., & Grinstein, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2000-12-25
Volume
151
Issue
7
Pages
1353-1368
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2165448884
Cited by
539
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Keywords
phagocytosis, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, diacylglycerol, phosphoinositide signaling, phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinase, phospholipase C-gamma, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, phagosome, macrophages, phagocytic cup, membrane lipid metabolism
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cell Line, Diglycerides, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Genes, Dominant, Isoenzymes, Macrophages, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Biological, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Type C Phospholipases, Pseudopodia, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Transfection, Signal Transduction, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Receptors, IgG, Phosphotransferases (Alcohol Group Acceptor), Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate, Mice, Phospholipase C gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-18, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-18 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review