Cited by 77Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineConducting polymers and applications

In vivo evaluation of a neural stem cell-seeded prosthesis

Open access
Purcell, E K, Seymour, J P, Yandamuri, S, Kipke, D R·2009·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Neural prosthetics capable of recording or stimulating neuronal activity may restore function for patients with motor and sensory deficits resulting from injury or degenerative disease. However, overcoming inconsistent recording quality and stability in chronic applications remains a significant challenge. A likely reason for this is the reactive tissue response to the devices following implantation into the brain, which is characterized by neuronal loss and glial encapsulation. We have developed a neural stem cell-seeded probe to facilitate integration of a synthetic prosthesis with the surrounding brain tissue. We fabricated parylene devices that include an open well seeded with neural stem cells encapsulated in an alginate hydrogel scaffold. Quantitative and qualitative data describing the distribution of neuronal, glial, and progenitor cells surrounding seeded and control devices are reported over four time points spanning 3 months. Neuronal loss and glial encapsulation associated with cell-seeded probes were mitigated during the initial week of implantation and exacerbated by 6 weeks post-insertion compared to control conditions. We hypothesize that graft cells secrete neuroprotective and neurotrophic factors that effect the desired healing response early in the study, with subsequent cell death and scaffold degradation accounting for a reversal of these results later. Applications of this biohybrid technology include future long-term neural recording and sensing studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/6/2/026005

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tissue at the electrode interface demonstrates re-emergence of markers associated with development and re-entry into the cell cycle, indicating plasticity in the local environment of neural prostheses.

    “Finally, the tissue at the electrode interface demonstrates the re-emergence of markers associated with development and re-entry into the cell cycle, indicating plasticity in the local environment of neural prostheses.87,92,93”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

    The ‘Scaffold condition effects on neuronal and non-neuronal densities’ section (page not provided) reports doublecortin, a marker associated with migrating neuronal precursors, in host tissue one week after implantation. It treats the significance of that finding cautiously and does not report markers of cell-cycle re-entry. The claim is supported for a developmental marker at the interface, but not for cell-cycle re-entry or a demonstrated conclusion about local plasticity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Immunohistochemistry showed evidence of graft cells within the device channel one day following implantation in a rat brain.

    “Immunohistochemistry showed evidence of graft cells (white arrowheads) within the device channel one day following implantation in a rat brain”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

  • Incorporation of neural stem and progenitor cells on CNS prostheses has been achieved through hydrogel scaffolding.

    “More recently, concepts for neural stem and progenitor cell-seeded CNS prostheses have been reported, where incorporation on the device has been achieved through hydrogel scaffolding 87 or attachment to laminin 88 (Fig. 4).”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

  • Concepts for neural stem and progenitor cell-seeded CNS prostheses have been reported.

    “More recently, concepts for neural stem and progenitor cell-seeded CNS prostheses have been reported, where incorporation on the device has been achieved through hydrogel scaffolding 87 or attachment to laminin 88 (Fig. 4).”

    From Regenerative Electrode Interfaces for Neural Prostheses. (2016) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purcell, E. K., Seymour, J. P., Yandamuri, S., & Kipke, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2009-03-13
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
026005
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2083395032
Cited by
76
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB002030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
Keywords
neural stem cells, neuroprosthetics, parylene, neuronal loss, neuroprotection, neurotrophic factors, scaffold degradation, chronic neural recording, biohybrid devices, brain implantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cell Count, Cell Line, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Neuroglia, Neurons, Polymers, Stem Cells, Xylenes, Linear Models, Cell Death, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prostheses and Implants, Stem Cell Transplantation, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review