The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 10,901–11,000 of 12,257
Beyond Literacy: Embracing Illiteracies as Strategic Resistance in Citizenship Education
Lin, J. C. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70745
Citrawan, H., & Firmanditya, N. (2026) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-026-10525-7
Hidayat, A., Abdulrahman, T. R., Qazi, M. Z. U. H., Abdi, K., Yin, C.-H., Nurmalia, & Azram, L. (2026) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2026.2686993
Moral Distress as Subordination by Design: Silence, Containment and the Ethical Erosion of Nursing
Ramsay, A., McBain‐Rigg, K. E., & Hartin, P. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70123
Reproductive Autonomy Under Erasure
Çankaya, I. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960256.003.0142
Muller-Kosmarov, C., & Chapman, R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197852668.003.0035
Wirth, U. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s40955-026-00350-7
Producing Mobility, Withholding Authority: Epistemic Drain and Nursing Sovereignty in Nepal
Ghimire, A. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70093 · Cited by 1
Misuse of Evidence in Sex and Gender Policy
Ojeda, T., Pape, M., Grijseels, D. M., Caselles, E. L., Bekker, S., Blanc, J.-S., Bons, D., Demers, G., Gonsalves, T., Lamble, S., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2026-0002
Schmid, C. B., Hamilton, S., Hind, L., & Cowper-Coles, M. (2026) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2026.10074
Sloane, Y. (2026) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639261460171
Healey, H., Caxaj, C. S., & Nouvet, É. (2026) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000634
Sheintul, S. (2026) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-026-10104-w
Ka, A., Diallo, A., Seck, S. M., Diatta, B. D., Sow, S., & Togtoga, L. (2026) · Cahiers Agricultures · doi:10.1051/cagri/2026014
Pearson, N., Baker, P. A., & Bradshaw, J. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.70268
Kristensen, N. G. (2026) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2026.2664602
Lived Experience of Suicide in Suicide Researchers
Danaee, E., Chan, P. P. M., Chen, V. V., Lebovic, R., Mason, S. G., Hatcher, S., Klonsky, E. D., Schaffer, A., Mitchell, R. H. B., Steinberg, R. J., et al. (2026) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a001062
Grief and the Limits of Possibility
Hughes, E., & Millar, B. (2026) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2026.10091
Rühlmann, L., Mecheril, P., Kooroshy, S., & Gandouz-Touati, Y. (2026) · ZQF – Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung · doi:10.3224/zqf.v27i1.03
Intimate Reading . Zur Aktualität einer Lektürepraxis unter Bedingungen datenbasierter Sprachsysteme
Abbt, C. (2026) · Orbis Litterarum · doi:10.1111/oli.70059
Standpoint theory’s methodological imperatives
Tuckwell, W., & Yeo, S. L. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05657-z
Fortellinger om bekymring, beskyttelse og omsorg. Voldsutsatte mødre snakker om barna
Bjørnholt, M. (2026) · Tidsskriftet Norges barnevern · doi:10.18261/tnb.103.2-3.3
After Structural Evil: Post-Apartheid Literature and the Problem of Moral Normativity
Bogdan, A. (2026) · Dialogo · doi:10.51917/dialogo.2026.12.2.22
COVID-19 and the Awajún: An onto-epistemic crisis in the Northern Peruvian Amazon
Oviedo, A., Escobedo, L. G., Díaz, Y. A. S., Martell, H. F., & Rituay, A. M. C. (2026) · Journal of Intercultural Communication · doi:10.36923/jicc.v26i2.1448
Христокін, Г., Клешня, Г. М., & Шоріна, Т. (2026) · Успіхи і досягнення у науці · doi:10.52058/3041-1254-2026-5(27)-897-914
Juniper, W. (2026) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2026.2666435
RetractedPRINCÍPIO DO NÃO RACISMO COMO PRINCÍPIO PROCESSUAL PENAL
Barroso, A. P. (2026) · Even3 Publicações eBooks · doi:10.29327/5867094.1-44
Why We Need a Theory of Expressive Action
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0003
Erza, A., Susilo, D., & Putri, G. (2026) · Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.37275/oaijss.v9i3.328
Unearthing the Archive: Ιdeologies of Transcription and the Anagnostou–Kretschmer Dispute
Delveroudi, R. (2026) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages11060130
Bennett, C. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.001.0001
Bennett, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0001
Valente, K. L. (2026) · Even3 Publicações eBooks · doi:10.29327/5867094.1-27
Marcotte, J., Dupéré, S., & Grandisson, M. (2026) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.157921
The Expressive Reasons Explanation
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0007
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.002.0006
Marking a Significant Situation
Bennett, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0006
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0011
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0012
Why We Don’t Yet Have a Good Theory of Expressive Action
Bennett, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0004
Can We Endorse Expressive Reasons on Reflection?
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0009
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0013
RUTTENBERG, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2026.1822425
Bennett, C. D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.003.0008
Bennett, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197838105.002.0005
Hermeneutical Injustice and Innovation: Culpably Bad Listeners
Willis, N. (2026) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.9864
121Africa as Model for a Future Historiography of Philosophy
Graneß, A. (2026) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783111651606-007
Legacy and the Politics of Racial Terminology
Podosky, P. C. (2026) · Journal of Applied Philosophy · doi:10.1002/japp.70110
What's Wrong With “Conceptual Amelioration”?
Dror, L. (2026) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70133
Adinkra Symbols through Generative AI: A Semiotic Analysis of Emoji-Based Translation
Nias, J., Aryal, S. K., Campbell, K., Cooper, K. R., Douglas, T., & Yankey, J. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806725
Between conflict and contribution: Jewish editors and the politics of knowledge on Wikipedia
Lir, S. A. (2026) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565261459183
External‐World Skepticism and the New Ethics of Belief
Fritz, J. (2026) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70140
Politics of knowledge and policy uptake
Campbell, M., & Davis, V. (2026) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.70051
Explorations in Fatherland: psychotherapeutic reflections on fathers and fatherhood
Briggs, A. (2026) · Journal of Child Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/0075417x.2026.2690656
Neomythism as Postdigital Pedagogy
de Lune, R. (2026) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-026-00677-x
Rostampour, S. (2026) · Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique · doi:10.1177/07591063261451877
Empowering voices of the neurodiverse community through inclusive research
Doan, T. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance · doi:10.1108/joepp-05-2025-0408
Mehdiyeva, J. (2026) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614524.2026.2689992
Rahaman, A. (2026) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096261455685
How to Deal with Reference Theories?
Batista, V. A. V. S., & Dressler, B. (2026) · Religionspädagogische Beiträge · doi:10.20377/rpb-1992
Social Conflicts and the Normative Discourse
Iyer, P. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197818138.003.0018
The argument from epistemic injustice for compulsory philosophical education in primary schools
Georgakakis, C. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2691553
Beyond gender and racial bias: Towards pro-justice ethical GenAI use in medicine and health
Bhaumik, S. (2026) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057261464214
Naming Violence, Making Worlds, Recovering Difference Beyond Inclusion: Chief Editors’ Introduction
Moore, A. M. D., Stephens, E., & Cavanagh, S. L. (2026) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2026.2682634
Dewi, A. N., Sørensen, B., & Thellefsen, M. (2026) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-04-2026-0185
Kindlinger, M., & Hahn-Laudenberg, K. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197818138.003.0011
Recurrent urinary tract infections in primary care: a qualitative study of women’s experiences
Clausen, C. S., Jørgensen, L. B., Bjerrum, L., Holm, A., & Risør, M. B. (2026) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-026-03448-6
Hlaimi, S., & Maloney, J. (2026) · Citizenship Social and Economics Education · doi:10.1177/14788047261461204
Living faith at work: Christian social work in statutory contexts
Bouch, A., & Ruch, G. (2026) · Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought · doi:10.1080/15426432.2026.2689691
Filistrucchi, P., Aversa, G., Aversa, M., & Giordano, M. (2026) · MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL INFANZIA · doi:10.3280/mal2026-002004
Brugulat-Panés, A., Martin-Pintado, C., Guell, C., Unwin, N. C., Iese, V., Augustus, E., & Foley, L. S. (2026) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020906
Ideological drivers of climate obstruction and delay: political parties and public opinion in Spain
Ochoa, C. Y., Terán, M. T., Alix, L. M. L., & Domínguez, M. G. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-026-01127-7
Warren, J., Little, C., Bernie, C., & Stewart, B. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009674621.004
AI, PEERS, AND SUPERVISORS: EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY IN POSTGRADUATE SUPERVISION
Agung, A. S. S. N., Surtikanti, M. W., Maiza, M., Alfaruqy, D., Baihaqi, I., Ramadhan, R. M., Jaya, D. J., & Zulita, D. (2026) · Journal of English Educational Study (JEES) · doi:10.31932/jees.v9i1.6211
Storytelling and political theory
Altamirano, A. A., Dege, C. L., Honig, B., Longo, M., & Owen, D. A. (2026) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-026-00819-7
The Ulysses Framework: A Navigational Approach to Complexity in Forensic Psychiatric Practice
Borrajo, R. H., & de Castro‐Manglano, P. (2026) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-026-00577-y
Kehoe, M. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70746
Formation ethics: a cross-cultural framework for AI governance
Kim, S. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03186-4
Uncanny Human Kinds: the Problematic Social Life of Deep Learning-Generated Health Categories
Postan, E. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01125-1
Puddifoot, K. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05619-5
Leblanc-Huard, G., Côté, C. I., L’Espérance, A., & Thériault, J. (2026) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593261455074
Karumbaiah, S., Yin, Y., & Brighouse, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29773-0_19
Tancredi, S. (2026) · Multimodality & Society · doi:10.1177/26349795261458544
Duncan, T. S., Wannheden, C., Hägglund, M., Koch, S., & Riggare, S. S. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-15039-3
AHMADOVA, P. (2026) · Mediterranean Journal of Humanities · doi:10.13114/mjh.1894548
Beyond Procedural Universalism: Relational Ethics and the Limits of Global Public Health Codes
Adolfo, J. D. (2026) · Asian Bioethics Review · doi:10.1007/s41649-026-00416-1
van de Ven, I., & Slatman, J. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11040106
When domestic violence becomes ‘family conflict’
Zhang, L. (2026) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.25281.zha
Intersectional deprivation: refugee women's entrepreneurship in a UK deprived context
Joseph, D., Eberhardt, J., & Ike, T. J. (2026) · International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/ijge-03-2024-0088 · Cited by 2
Burt, K. G. (2026) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593261457575
Ambiguity Collapse by LLMs: A Taxonomy of Epistemic Risks
Gur-Arieh, S., Wang, A., & Fazelpour, S. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806469 · Cited by 2
The biased co-counsel: analyzing gendered defense strategies in AI-assisted criminal litigation
Voutyrakou, D. A., & Voutyrakos, N. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01221-0
Shafqat, S., Shahbaz, Z., Ajaz, R., & Ahmad, H. S. (2026) · Bio Communications · doi:10.71320/bcs.0019
Ennegrecer la Educación Matemática: Desafíos éticos y epistémicos
Valoyes-Chávez, L. (2026) · Revista Venezolana de Investigación en Educación Matemática · doi:10.54541/reviem.v6i2.203
Narrative Ownership, Storytelling, and the Politics of Voice
Ifrach, W. R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8597-6.ch007
Temsilin Ötesinde: Güvenlik ve İstihbarat Ekosisteminde Kadın
Taşdemir, İ. (2026) · KADEM Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.21798/kadem.2026.213
Palestine's Institutions of Memory: Libraries and Archives
Çakmakkaya, İ. (2026) · Filistin Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.34230/fiad.1811869
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
