The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 10,601–10,700 of 12,257
de Souza, P., & Moran, R. J. (2026) · New directions in cultural policy research · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-17063-7_6
2. Distributed knowledge creation
Heller, R. F. (2026) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0520.02
(Mis)educating the empire: Non-recognition, colonial ignorance, and epistemic paralysis
Agra, K. L. R. (2026) · Thesis Eleven · doi:10.1177/07255136261444386
Gibbs, A. A., Isebor, V., Thomas, L., & Morgan, J. (2026) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/18387357.2026.2664479 · Cited by 1
Critical Epistemologies of AI Healthcare Apps
Ivanova, M., & Sobey, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15112-4_29
Translation, Privilege, and Racecraft in Classics
Haley, S. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009295116.022
Drugs, Sexual Trauma, and the Improvised Labour of Survival
Frankovitch, A. (2026) · Body & Society · doi:10.1177/1357034x261440769
Amor infraestructural y ayuda mutua trans en España
Silveira, M. S. (2026) · RELIES Revista del Laboratorio Iberoamericano para el Estudio Sociohistórico de las Sexualidades · doi:10.46661/relies.13015
Algorithmic Racism in AI Chatbots: Epistemic and Ethical Perspectives on Auditing
Molick, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15112-4_33
Davies, A., Abawi, Z. E., & Richardson, B. (2026) · Journal of Childhood Studies · doi:10.18357/jcs512202622697
Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene‐Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease
Wiggleton-Little, J., Thomas, S. P., Walters, K., & Albright, C. A. (2026) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.70033
Responsible AI for Research: Between Moral Philosophy and Philosophy of Science
Mussgnug, A. M., Leonelli, S., & Vallor, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15112-4_20
Alwis, S. D., Pearson, A., & Hodgetts, S. (2026) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535261445110
The mirror ethic: reflection, relation, and responsibility
Lee, C. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01160-w
Davies, A. (2026) · Journal of Childhood Studies · doi:10.18357/jcs512202622028
Parker, A. E., & Marcucci, O. (2026) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004261445042
Moola, F. J., Johnson, K., & Moothathamby, N. (2026) · Journal of Childhood Studies · doi:10.18357/jcs512202621683
Mseer, I., Fedhly, H. A., & Noori, L. (2026) · Artificial intelligence · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1014172
Can AI Invent Calculus, or Just Mimic Math?
Kale, G., Hedayatipour, A., Vishwakarma, R., Diamond, H., & Rezaei, A. (2026) · International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AAIML) · doi:10.1109/aaiml67890.2026.11498223
Modern Disciplinary Formations
Andújar, R., Giusti, E., & Murray, J. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009295116.014
Yoo, J. (2026) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004261445041
Belmiro, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16800-9_12
The absence of anger: ‘Lived experience’, emotions, and framing techniques in UK anti-poverty work
Crossley, S., & Piggott, S. (2026) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/02610183261447781
Monumental empowerment: The vandalism of public mnemonic objects
Puzzi, S. (2026) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980261447403
Couture, D. (2026) · Culture Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-026-09979-y
Karsgaard, C., Silova, I., & Desimoni, V. (2026) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth6020060
Alternative Worlds are Possible: Educational Decolonization and Open Reparative Futures
Eugene, C., & Jules, T. D. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1479-367920260000052020
Sheppy, B. (2026) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2025.0119
Higher Education and Community Engagement
Nyangiwe, Z., Hornby, D., McCann, C., Maistry, S. M., Kelland, L., Maistry, S. M., Phillanders, S., Victor, M., Paul, V., Jjuuko, R., et al. (2026) · doi:10.21504/qhch9s86
Jalajala, L., Nkani, N., Nyangiwe, Z., Valela, Z., & McCann, C. (2026) · doi:10.21504/f8r8mq92
Cresti, M. (2026) · Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1177/14777509261449622
Rugkåsa, J., Bråten, B., Johannessen, A., & Häikiö, K. (2026) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/23978821y2026d000000190
Bridging Knowledge and Transforming Practice
Nkonki-Mandleni, B. (2026) · African Journal of Higher Education Community Engagement · doi:10.21504/ajhece.v2i2.2937
Rosati, F., Miscioscia, M., & Anzani, A. (2026) · Psychology and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/19419899.2026.2670483 · Cited by 2
Integral Education and Epistemic Justice: Gandhi, Tagore, and Sri Aurobindo in Global Discourse
Shankar, B. (2026) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-026-00998-y
Voicu, C.-G. (2026) · Education and human development · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1014728
Slow Death and Key Workers: The Ordinary Crisis of Waste Work During the COVID‐19 Pandemic
Davies, T., Balayannis, A., Garnett, E., Gladding, T. L., Hinchliffe, S., & Nicholson, P. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70070
Accommodating Neurodivergence in the Scientific Workforce: Recouping Lost Opportunities
Ganguly, D., & Dasgupta, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1028-3_31
Molobye, K., & Costa, N. D. (2026) · South African Theatre Journal · doi:10.1080/10137548.2025.2588202
Capacitismo Afetivo-Sexual e a disputa pela legitimidade do desejo autista nas redes sociais
Marinho, R. J. S., & Cúnico, S. D. (2026) · RELIES Revista del Laboratorio Iberoamericano para el Estudio Sociohistórico de las Sexualidades · doi:10.46661/relies.13192
Allaithy, A. (2026) · International Journal of Digital Humanities · doi:10.1007/s42803-026-00126-y
Feminist Philosophy of Disability
Tremain, S. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197852668.003.0031
Invisible chains: On the philosophical and historical origins of epistemic carcerality
Oteng, J. O., & Thompson, W. C. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2660707
Singh, R. P., & Gibu Sabu, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1739758
Communal relational danger in Latin American combat traditions
Rodríguez, A. M. C. (2026) · Journal of the Philosophy of Sport · doi:10.1080/00948705.2026.2666838
Collett, N. A. (2026) · Probation Journal · doi:10.1177/02645505261434472
Rubeis, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14301-3_5
Harnessing AI for Climate Resilience in the Global South
Gaikwad, A., (c1c3f107-7330-4bdf-a9bd-af37820cb070, K. M., & Mishra, S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7205-1.ch009
Yang, M., Chang, J., Chai, S., & Geng, Z. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9065008/v1
Feathers on My Skin: Five Pedagogical Inspirations From Art Conceptualisms
Smith, A. G. (2026) · Visual Arts Research · doi:10.5406/21518009.52.1.11
Epistemic authority and psychotherapy: Who gets to know what about whom?
Watts, J. (2026) · European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling · doi:10.1080/13642537.2026.2666032
Chancen, Risiken und Unsicherheiten
Keuthen, T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-51418-1_5
African Studies: Whose Data, Whose Evidence?
Okeke, N. M. (2026) · Philosophia Africana · doi:10.5325/philafri.24.1.0080
Jones, V. R., Rathore, I., Waring, J. J., Wright, N., & Fenton, S. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105765
Pillars of Justice and Equity: Advancing Equitable and Just Climate Innovation
Oluoch, J., Greenwalt, J., Bhandari, A., Bolo, E., Burgess, J., Campbell, K., Jhina, A., Jomo, D. M., Jukur, S., Lozet, F., et al. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6517-7_7
Baruah, P., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2670368
Mutua, E. M. (2026) · Journal of Multicultural Discourses · doi:10.1080/17447143.2026.2671940
Agor, D. C., Smith, A. J., Koshy, G., Ayonrinde, O., Meanley, S., Liebrenz, M., & Persaud, A. (2026) · Geopsychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.geopsy.2026.100094
Saleem, T., Azam, S., & Saleem, A. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261444231
Torn Apart: Structural Racism and the Targeting of Muslim Mothers by Child Welfare
Jönsson, J. H., Jonsson, J., & Alsaidan, H. (2026) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/08861099261448919
The Politics of Privilege: Discrimination, Monopolized Social Rights, and Reform
Sabl, A. (2026) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055426101646
Simon, G., Tadmor, N., Evans, J., Luke, D., & Luoma, J. B. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9695196/v1
Dayoub, B., Omran, S., Yang, P., & Alkayem, N. F. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18104782
Journaling the cost-of-living crisis: stories from Scotland
Cloughton, B., Robertson, L., & McHardy, F. (2026) · Journal of Creative Research Methods · doi:10.1332/30502969y2026d000000027
Phenomenology and psychopharmacology: a mutually enlightening relationship?
Lopes, M. (2026) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-026-10165-z
Lavrenciuc, S., Andriambololona, H., Harimalala, P. C., & Tzilanizara, T. (2026) · Geo Geography and Environment · doi:10.1002/geo2.70087
Why We Shouldn't Trust Institutions: Critical Theory and the Case for Radical Distrust
Khoban, Z. (2026) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.70058
Martino, A. S., & Hardy, K. (2026) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.1177/13607804251403342
Beyond the silence: Decolonizing Japanese media representations of global south migrant voices
Pelea, C. I. (2026) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/09579265261442884
Rethinking Informed Consent: Ethical Tensions and Adaptive Practices in Participatory Research
Malik, M., Mayer, K., Wintersteller, T., & Wöhrer, V. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261442714
Fang, X., & Liang, H. (2026) · Asian Journal of Medical Humanities · doi:10.1515/ajmedh-2025-0059
van Till, S. A. L., Schermer, M., Bruining, H., Verhage, M., & Bunnik, E. M. (2026) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70119
Keyse, R. E., Esteve, A., & Yapp, E. (2026) · Genders and sexualities in history · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10800-5_1
Spyra, J. (2026) · Genders and sexualities in history · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10800-5_9
Face value: How avatar identity shapes epistemic trust in AI-mediated learning
Anthis, Z., & Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, A. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100610 · Cited by 1
Normative Silences and the Limits of Fairness
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_3
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_1
Differentiated trust: navigating credibility landscapes in community-engaged research
Arxer, S. L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1846231
Affective Archives and the Ethics of Listening
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_8
King, B. W., Dayrell, C., & Zorzi, V. (2026) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2026.2670550
Rebreathing Life into Philosophical Understandings of Breath: Breathlessness and Phenomenology
Williams, T. (2026) · Handbooks in philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75780-8_14-1
Psychological Safety and Ethically Fraught Discharges: A Reflection from the Rehabilitation Space
Tarsney, P. S., & Benjaminy, S. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2657901
Grounding Theory: Praxis, Refusal, and the Remaking of the Political
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_9
Epistemic Injustice and the Politics of Voice
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_5
Caste, Gender, and the Grammar of Exclusion
Mistry, A. (2026) · Palgrave studies in classical liberalism · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0187-7_7
Depression detectives: piloting a methodology for online co-produced research
Collins, S., Kupfer, C., Organ, S., Lewins, M., McIntosh, A., & Beange, I. (2026) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-026-00889-2
Historical truth, accountability and change in the (post-)colonial state: an Introduction
Destrooper, T., & Pallí-Asperó, C. (2026) · Rethinking History · doi:10.1080/13642529.2025.2609476
Oral history as reparatory practice for health professions: an ethic of epistemic justice
Dahlberg, B., Snider, S., & Martucci, J. (2026) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-026-10544-w
Sensory Democracy: Flourishing as Ongoingness in Somatic-Based Neurodiversity Discourse
Lee, Y. (2026) · Leonardo · doi:10.1162/leon.a.2708
Special Issue Editorial: Second World Approaches to International Law
Wasiński, M. J., & Labuda, P. I. (2026) · International Community Law Review · doi:10.1163/18719732-bja10172
Andersson, P., Grim, K., & Schön, U. (2026) · Social Work in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/15332985.2026.2674549
After school? Are we conscripts of modernity?; a postscript to Against School 1
Ball, S. J. (2026) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2026.2663871
Kuzmina, N. (2026) · Visnyk of the Lviv University · doi:10.30970/pps.2026.64.17
Children in Kenya and the US are averse to epistemic injustice
Jacobs, C., Ritov, O., Chau, E., Njogu, N., Srinivasan, M., Zeidler, H., & Engelmann, J. M. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag085
Letter to the editor: The not-yet-lost future of rheumatology
de Lara, A. M., Fuentes-Silva, Y., Quintana, R., Caicedo, A. I. O., Pons‐Estel, G., Reyes-Cordero, G. C., Pons‐Estel, B. A., & Peláez-Ballestas, I. D. P. (2026) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-026-08145-4
Predicting Climate Displacement
Aishwarya (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2020-3.ch009
Das, K., G, A. M., & Anand, M. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2669571
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
