The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,101–11,200 of 12,257
Learning, Unlearning and Not-for-Learning: From Funds of Knowledge to Pedagogies of Discomfort
Tazewell, S., Waller, R., & Podpadec, T. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83662-552-020261002
Decolonizing Psychological Science and Practice in Africa: Barriers and Bridges
Adjei, S. B. (2026) · Community psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15816-1_2
Managing the Epistemic Fairness Paradox in AI-Augmented Research
Rai, A. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3827965
Disordered Wrongdoing, Freedom, and Compassion
Campbell, B. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1126617ar
Nursing Erasure: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Series Painkiller
Ranta, T., & Adam, S. (2026) · Witness The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse · doi:10.25071/2291-5796.189
Standing Your Ground on Moral Disagreement
Gensollen, M., Jiménez‐Rolland, M., & Mosqueda, A. (2026) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.70038
Epistemic and Linguistic Injustice in Research: Sharing Experiential Knowledge
Drolet, M.-J., Lafond, V., & Côté, L. P. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1126634ar
Mediated Voices, Shared Trauma: Rethinking Testimony and Narrative Agency in Women Talking
K, N. N. (2026) · Changing English · doi:10.1080/1358684x.2026.2691152
Mokgwathi, M. S., & Ngoveni, M. A. (2026) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i104a10
‘An idea of a boundary’: Cognitive estrangement and the hypervisibility of the wall
Cheslow, E., & Pierce, W. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2691557
Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10371-1
Negi, B., Shukla, S., Gupta, D., Tuli, M., & Chaudhary, N. (2026) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-026-10017-0
Juniper, W. (2026) · Journal of African Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/13696815.2026.2694062
Kitta, A., Kapusta, N. D., Ecker, F., Bär, J., Adamidis, F., Kum, L., & Masel, E. K. (2026) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-026-02227-5
Takahashi, Y. (2026) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1177/25739581261467967
Ciência aberta e justiça linguística
Almeida, W. G. (2026) · Ciência da Informação Express · doi:10.60144/v7i.2026.198
Thompson, J. G., & Malone, S. J. (2026) · Social Service Review · doi:10.1086/742194
Vindictive Tolerance: The Philosophical Anatomy of a Political Pathology
Risse, M. (2026) · Political Philosophy · doi:10.16995/pp.30207
William, E. (2026) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies11040121
Agricultural gaslighting: extractive logics in agrarian governance in Malawi
Moyo, D. Z., & Murrey, A. (2026) · African Geographical Review · doi:10.1080/19376812.2026.2703668
Being Human: Exploring How Children and Young People Seeking Help Felt Professionals Perceived Them
McVeigh, M. J. (2026) · Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10560-026-01130-5
A Dataset of Cultural Heritage Manipulation on English Wikipedia in the Russo–Ukrainian Context
Garambois, M., Tamrazyan, H. S., & Boroş, E. (2026) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3805712.3808580
Recent Work in the Epistemology of Inquiry
Haerle, P. H. (2026) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anag043
Inclusive research and citizen science: collaboration beyond the guarantee of success
Bevelander, K. E., & Leensen, M. C. J. (2026) · TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · doi:10.1007/s12508-026-00523-2
Psychoanalysis and banning conversion therapy: a response to Jeremy Clarke on ‘Code Gender’
Zyl, J. V., & Jenkins, P. (2026) · Psychodynamic Practice · doi:10.1080/14753634.2026.2703696
The Art of Undoing: The Need for Exit Strategies in Psychiatry
Speyer, H., Møeller, S. B., & Slade, M. (2026) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20250618
Beyond Individualised Injustice: Rethinking Modern Trauma-Informed Care
Ewen, J. E. (2026) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2026.2684705
Inclusief onderzoek en burgerwetenschap: samenwerken voorbij de succesgarantie
Bevelander, K. E., & Leensen, M. C. J. (2026) · TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · doi:10.1007/s12508-026-00515-2
AI Hallucination as Epistemic Proliferation
Karunanayaka, I. P. (2026) · Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.55613/jeet.v36i2.238
Safeguarding Indigenous Medical Knowledge in the Face of Biopiracy and Modernization in Zimbabwe
Sibanda, M., & Rukara, M. M. R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2885-8.ch008
The Language Games of Pain in Nursing: A Wittgensteinian Analysis of NANDA‐I Diagnoses
Mariscal-Delgadillo, M. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70097
Torres, S. T. D., Donaxi, A., & Luengas, J. F. R. (2026) · Sintaxis · doi:10.36105/stx.2026n17.03
Qinaʻau, J., Mariano, A. Y., Kahili-Heede, M. K., Kone, S., Rivera, C., Rapadas, C. C., Chatto, S., Clack, V. J., Johnson, F. N., Johnson-Jennings, M., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1809539
Jarial, S., & Bala, I. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2885-8.ch014
Advocacy, Isolation, and Agency
West, E. K. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9315-5.ch007
Systemic harm and institutional silencing: children’s wellbeing in private family law proceedings
Dalgarno, E., Bramwell, D., Robson, N., & Verma, A. (2026) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2026.2696734
Lemoine, V. (2025) · Alterstice Revue internationale de la recherche interculturelle · doi:10.7202/1125924ar
Budnitz, H., & Schwanen, T. (2026) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2026.2691007
CONSTRUCTING WHAT CAN BE SAID: CONCOURSE DEVELOPMENT IN Q-METHODOLOGICAL AUTISM RESEARCH
Ahmetovic, M., & Schuwerk, T. (2026) · Research in Education and Rehabilitation · doi:10.51558/2744-1555.2026.9.1.129
Claiming Novelty, Claiming Authority: Gender Gaps in Scientific Impact across Disciplines
Lee, J. (2026) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432261462166 · Cited by 1
Munthe, H. M., Napsiah, N., & Siahaan, A. Y. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70229
Pietersen, D., & Ndofirepi, A. P. (2026) · Education Innovation Diversity · doi:10.17770/eid2026.1.84
Gensollen, M. (2026) · Aitías Revista de Estudios Filosóficos del Centro de Estudios Humanísticos de la UANL · doi:10.29105/aitias6.6-138
Hernández, M. A. A., González, L. F. M., & Arce, M. L. (2026) · Aitías Revista de Estudios Filosóficos del Centro de Estudios Humanísticos de la UANL · doi:10.29105/aitias6.6-135
Lavado, I. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7749-0.ch005
Curated information frameworks and the Governance of artificial intelligence
LaRosa, E. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01242-9
The Reputation Tour: A Cartography of Feminist Resistance
Abraham, D., Warren, H., & Rajaei, A. (2026) · Journal of Feminist Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/08952833.2026.2706270
Clinical Legibility: Recognition Infrastructure in Nursing
Sandifer, J. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70145
Yongco, J. S., Mapandi, H., & Silor, F. S. C. (2026) · Perspectives Policy and Practice in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13603108.2026.2703551
Gott, M., Black, S., Wiles, J. L., Williams, L., Moeke‐Maxwell, T., & Robinson, J. (2026) · Palliative Care and Social Practice · doi:10.1177/26323524261445576
Faith That Thinks: Judaism's Case Against Blind Obedience and the Deadly Cost of CertaintyPreprint
Friedman, H. H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7128919
Erbay, H., & Baysal, Z. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-026-10593-1
Opoku, R. A., Michel, L., Adom, K., & Weir, C. (2026) · Palgrave studies of marketing in emerging economies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27126-6_7
From Digital to Postdigital: Rethinking Citizenship in the Age of Immaterial Labour
Walidaini, R. N., & Tamrin, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/60490_2026_25
Epistemic Alchemy of AI in Education: Inclusion, Exclusion, and Coloniality of Knowledge
Ahmad, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/60490_2026_21
Hackett, S., Fletcher, A., Iranpour, A., Wigham, S., Hardacre, C., Hills‐Wilson, C., McKinnon, I., McKenzie, K., Davies, K., Power, N., et al. (2026) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.14259.1
Towards a paradigm shift for decolonizing international development projects
Leroux, M.-P. (2026) · Critical Perspectives on International Business · doi:10.1108/cpoib-05-2024-0044
Care, Human Enfeeblement, and the Existential Implications of AGI
Rousse, B. S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-33195-3_16
Unequal academics: AI as a threat to the voice and agency of Asian women in academia
Ting, C. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1856166
Trauma and Mental Illness: Interrogating Psychiatric Ethics in Freida McFadden's Ward D
Vimal, A. (2026) · International Journal of Arts and Humanities · doi:10.61424/ijah.v4i3.959
Cerovac, I., & Perhat, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27049-8_7
From Silence to Sound: A Millian Defence of Free Speech
Polakova, L. (2026) · doi:10.22215/etd/2026-16930
Parochialism in Political Epistemology
McKenna, R. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27049-8_2
Quadruple Helix in Practice – Better Life Project Tools for Socially Engaged Research
Mulić, D., Ješić, J., Panić, A. A., Vukadinović, S., & Jotic, J. (2026) · Triple Helix Journal · doi:10.1163/21971927-bja10072
Soysal, Y., & Soysal, S. (2026) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2026.2706798
Bureaucratic discretion and digitalization in healthcare authorities' public procurement
Malandrino, A. (2026) · WELFARE E ERGONOMIA · doi:10.3280/we2026-001007
Erasing gendered death: Bureaucracies of (Un)Knowing in criminology
Gonzalez, V. V. (2026) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639261470066
Do We Need a “European Political Epistemology”?
Altanian, M., & Vogelmann, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27049-8_6
Toward a pedagogy of dignification: conceptualizing epistemic sovereignty in multilingual education
Malgoubri, I. (2026) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1080/15427587.2026.2708302
Who Speaks for Mental Health?: Negotiating Rights Between the State, NGOS and the Public
Schlitt, E. L. (2026) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2026-17140
Riegler, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27049-8_10
Decolonial and Indigenous Perspectives on Inclusion
Sharma, M., David, S., & Das, S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6315-8.ch002
Lo que el dolor deja: ganancias secundarias y resignificaciones en mujeres con fibromialgia
López, F. D. B., & Hamui-Sutton, L. (2026) · Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética · doi:10.14422/rib.i31.y2026.002
“My Body as an Egg Vending Machine”: (En)Countering Master Narratives in Egg Provider Blogs
Jacxsens, L., Proost, M. D., & Provoost, V. (2026) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.3138/ijfab-2025-0029
"Had to Use My Guts:" Epistemic Agency in Community-Led Digital Education with Temporary Farmworkers
Doggett, O., Allahdua, G., Bernard, T., Ratto, M., & Chandra, P. (2026) · ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) · doi:10.1145/3811242.3819105
Youth, Disability, and Resistance
Griffiths, M. (2026) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003175391
Anticolonial and Ethical Pedagogy: A Disruptive Approach to the Global South
de Sá, R. L. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15568-9_8
Peer-Bildung revisited. Subjektivierung als widerständige Bildungspraxis in Communities of Color
Or, Y. (2026) · Soziale Passagen · doi:10.1007/s12592-026-00593-8
Stjernetun, B. B., Åberg, C., & Rejnö, Å. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1899614
Liou, D. D., & Rojas, L. (2026) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth6030099
Building the Next Generation of Youth Researchers Through a Participatory Internship Program
Emezue, C., Grewal, A., Zhao, A., Sumit, K., Koshy, R. M., Rufino, R., Heda, T., Ephraim, R., Dunlap, A., Julion, K., et al. (2026) · Youth · doi:10.3390/youth6030102
Sone, E. M. (2026) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.20267616
Schneck, A. C. (2026) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2026.2690990
From product to operative artefact: practical authority and operational answerability in AI ethics
Velotto, G. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01285-y
Sajib, T., & Farhana, K. M. (2026) · Journal of Gender Education and Society · doi:10.64907/xkmf.v5.i3.jges.12 · Cited by 1
Informationstechnologie für Nachhaltigkeit: Die versteckten Kosten des digitalen Zeitalters
Lemke, C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29607-8_9
Neurodivergent Governance: Beyond Neurotypical International Relations
Temel, V. N. Ş. (2026) · Millennium Journal of International Studies · doi:10.1177/03058298261458086
Rethinking Non‐Domination: A Relational Perspective on Neo‐Republicanism
Devalckeneer, C. (2026) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.70106
Tapia, S. T. (2026) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2026.10163
Haapasaari, O., Adriansen, H. K., Kallo, J., & Saarinen, T. (2026) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2026.2707411
Nagula, S., Ahmed, N., Shane, K., & Slonim, A. D. (2026) · Children · doi:10.3390/children13080981
Gichuru, E. N., & Rukooko, A. B. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2700768
Shahida, K., Jacob, G. R., & Farhana, K. M. (2026) · Review of Teacher’s World · doi:10.64907/xkmf.v5i3.rtw.4
Pedersen, E. L., Christensen, H. M., Larsen, H., Andersen, C. B., Borup, M. B., Rafn, J., Andreassen, I. C., Beier, J., Pollak, K. I., Ellingsen, T., et al. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100835
Beyond “Misleading”: Rethinking the Evaluation of Autism and ADHD Social Media Content
van Asselt, A., Venema-Avezaat, L., Reekers, D., Ras, Y., & Roke, Y. (2026) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1177/25739581261473988
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
