The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,301–11,400 of 12,257
From line to life course: Trajectory thinking and the temporal sociology of poverty
Butler, S. (2026) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385261462745
Akbarian, S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9604-0.ch003
Nursaid, N., Wulandari, E., & Ghaluh, B. M. (2026) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649.2026.2712260
Indigenous, Rural, and Forcibly Displaced Migrant Talent: The Challenge of Visibility
Blumen, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27468-7_8
Kieft, M. (2026) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997261472889
Through the Lenses of Disabled Women Life Writers
Singh, P. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960256.003.0143
Desire to punish: Caste and sexual violence as communicative force
Menon, S., & Diwakar, J. (2026) · Journal of International and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/17513057.2026.2660820
Epistemologizing Technology: On the Technological Scaffolding of Epistemic Exchanges and Violence
Simpson, J. (2026) · Acta Analytica · doi:10.1007/s12136-026-00701-6
Malik, A., & Shackleton, H. (2026) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106352
Epistemic engulfment by proptech and finance in Canadian housing
St-Hilaire, C. (2026) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2026.2700087
Experiential deference and standpoint authority: a reason for optimism about moral deference
Pearlman, S. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05739-y
Huertas, S. M., Vergara, S. G., & Velez-Pardo, P. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10617927/v1
Friendship and Epistemic Injustice: A Reply to Warman
Akayev, S., & Waldenburg, R. (2026) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-026-01027-8
Echo Chambers in Social Epistemology
van Oosterum, K. (2026) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.70125
Neurodiversity and Fraud Vulnerability: Examining Accessibility Gaps in Protection and Awareness
Carter, E. (2026) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330261473134
Tickle, S., & Greenhow, S. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag160
Rabe, J., Jobe, A., & Williams, H. (2026) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330261472717
Boivin, M. (2026) · The International Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/13642987.2026.2711668
Gendered Neologisms and Social Transformation
Szymańska, M. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009785785
Introduction: Space for Interpretation
Swai, E., Waldock, K. E., & Jacobs, N. L. (2026) · Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies · doi:10.3828/jlcds.2026.8
Escamilla, E. G., & Lozano, M. J. M. (2026) · Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work · doi:10.1080/26408066.2026.2713491
Governança algorítmica e marginalização da Geografia no currículo escolar
Filho, R. A. R., dos Santos, F. K. S., & Oliveira, L. (2026) · Revista Ensino de Geografia (Recife) · doi:10.51359/2594-9616.2026.270073
Galasso, B. (2026) · Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI · doi:10.15198/seeci.2027.60.e985
Johnson, S. J., Han, Y., Syed, I. U., & Gorman, R. D. S. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14162446
Miller, E. C. A., Li, T., Akgün, S., Makori, H. K., Simani, M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081258
CRAFTING SUSTAINABLE KNOWLEDGE IN THE GEN-AI AGE: EMERGING EPISTEMOLOGIES FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Danraka, M. M., MAZADU, Z. B., Amina, A., & ISA, S. A. (2026) · Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Research · doi:10.70382/sjber.v13i4.068
Walker, T. (2026) · Women s Studies in Communication · doi:10.1080/07491409.2026.2708013
OLADIMEJI, E., Umar, A. A., Wuritka, E. G., & SHUAIBU, S. (2026) · Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Research · doi:10.70382/sjber.v13i4.065
Cárdenas, T. K. (2026) · Journal of Latin American Communication Research · doi:10.55738/journal.v14i1p.60-76
Pedagogy at the margins: Freirean praxis and epistemic justice in vocational education
Majola, E. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2714545
Academic Cooperation from the Souths: Geopolitics of the Gaze, Cognitive and Epistemic Justices
Casanova, J. V. (2026) · Journal of Latin American Communication Research · doi:10.55738/journal.v14i1p.35-49
Advancing AI , Virtue Enhancement, and the Need for Niebuhrian Virtues of Moral Vigilance
Peterson, G. R. (2026) · Journal of Religious Ethics · doi:10.1111/jore.70029
Climate Justice for Children: Impacts of Climate Change and Solutions
Akyiğit, H., Yiğit, M. G., Manion, K., Cortés, V., Yay, A. S. E., Atamer, D. D., Gültekin, G. S., Orhan, B., Özdemirci-Cinal, A. S., Karayaman, S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.59537/saupress.2547
Gill, H. B. (2026) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhag002
Roper, C., Sharpe, S., Azoury, L., Joffee‐Kohn, N., Swingler, N., Sansanwal, P., McKenner, L., Remmen, C. V., & Hamilton, B. E. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70812
Ulloa, A., Arcos, F. R., & Cárdenas-Guevara, L. (2026) · Cuadernos de Geografía Revista Colombiana de Geografía · doi:10.15446/rcdg.v35n2.125420
Lawrence, K. C. (2026) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Critical Communications · doi:10.51986/ijcc-2026.vol1.06
From equity to solidarity: how care and relationality transform the debate on justice in genomics
Prainsack, B. (2026) · Journal of Community Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12687-026-00932-5
Challenges in documenting South Africa’s oral traditions and indigenous languages
Sibeko, J., Mvanyashe, A., & Jacobs, V. (2026) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.2026778
Legal Lynching, Artificial Virtues and To Kill a Mockingbird
Jones, W. E. (2026) · Political Philosophy · doi:10.16995/pp.25097
Conclusions and Future Directions
Sillence, E., & Osborne, A. (2026) · Palgrave Studies in Cyberpsychology. · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-25909-7_7
>Postdigital Epistemic Violence
MacKenzie, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31322-5_7
>Postdigital Epistemology of Ignorance
MacKenzie, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31322-5_8
Minhas, S., Salawu, A., & Anh, T. V. (2026) · Sustainable Social Development · doi:10.23812/ssd8716
Hudiono, R. K., Lasso, A. H., & Prabawa, T. S. (2025) · Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality Management · doi:10.22334/jihm.v16i1.333
Tragantzopoulou, P., Tragantzopoulou, A., & Giannouli, V. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14162496
MacKenzie, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31322-5_9
Indigenous epidemiology in Canada: Epistemic struggle towards evidence, authority, and governance
Leason, J. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.17269/s41997-026-01239-1
Race and Ideology Inside and Outside of the Kallipolis
Kaufman, D., & Murray, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197804438.003.0008
Sullivan, N., Mäki-Penttilä, S., & Slimani, J. (2026) · Scandinavian Studies · doi:10.3368/sca.98.3.96
Gaber, S. N., Rapaport, P., Johnson, L., Lundström, J. E., Kneck, Å., Mattsson, E., & Siersbaek, R. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114512
Preserving Participant Meaning in AI-Mediated Multilingual Qualitative Research
Oluka, A., & Mashau, P. (2026) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.188352.1
Lee, M. (2026) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/17416590261473700
Toward critical and pluriversal communications: Knowledge, power, and justice in the inaugural issue
Omodan, B. I., & Romm, N. R. A. (2026) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Critical Communications · doi:10.51986/ijcc-2026.vol1.00
From Journalistic Gatekeeping to Algorithmic Governance
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0002
Cognitive Epistemic Modeling in AI Fact-Checking
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0011
Epistemic Labor and Human–AI Collaboration in Fact-Checking
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0006
Epistemic Issues in Global Development
Malavisi, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27828-0_10077-1
Crowdsourcing, Community Notes, and Participatory Verification
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0010
Legible Machines, Contestable Truths
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0009
Dabour, Z. K. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70723
Shin, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849644.003.0015
Cahill, J. D., & Gallagher, K. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108689229.010
Niederlohmann, E. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1867979
Teaching Presence as Cultural Intelligence for AI Governance
Baksh, S., & McFarlane-Ossmann, G. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9898-3.ch004
Patient Expertise in the Doctor–Patient Interaction
Gupta, S. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108689229.028
Fair foundations: ensuring epistemic justice in neurodiversity research and practice
Praslova, L. N. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1826790
Harberd, A. (2026) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqag055
Roul, S. K. (2026) · Archival Science · doi:10.1007/s10502-026-09559-4
Sustainable management: business and human rights issues in Thailand
Pimpa, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2026.1909590
Borges, J. B., & Gallo, E. D. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19306-3_6
Muallidin, I. (2026) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2025-8665
Reframing the Zapatista Movement: Epistemic Struggle, Narrative Resistance, and the Global South
PAZVANTOĞLU, C. A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19484-8_14
Politics, Religion, and Culture in Intersection
Khan, S., Kumar, V., & Khan, S. U. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6440-7.ch007
Ecological grief in scientific communities
Telwala, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2026.1924073
Yang, W., & Zhu, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1893046
Pankhuri, Jay, S., & Anjum, G. (2026) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057261479596
Ali, J. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7837-4.ch001
Sociolinguistics and Artificial Intelligence
Rouabhia, R. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9028-4.ch008
Prinz, J. M., & Prinz, C. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10390-y
Grievable Enough to Matter? The Gendered Politics of Reputational Care and Epistemic Inequality
Pervez, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960256.003.0078
Responsibility for White Ignorance
Martín, A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197817216.003.0004
Kang, Y., & Chen, Q. (2026) · Women s Studies · doi:10.1080/00497878.2026.2705932
ME/CFS and the emotional toll of persistent disbelief: from epistemic to affective injustice
Walter, S. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10388-6
Negotiating authority and hierarchy amongst UK and Australian nurses
Essex, R., Mainey, L., & Hui, A. (2026) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330261476268
Seeing pain, trauma and anxiety: the visual politics of credibility in the Really Strange series
Ajeesh, A. K. (2026) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2026-014022
A Funds of Identity Approach to Social Justice in Education
Esteban‐Guitart, M., Álvarez, A., Teeters, L., & Subero, D. (2026) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_9
Together: Trusting Others and Conversation in Dark Times
Filho, W. J. S., & Dazzani, M. V. M. (2026) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_3
Equality Amongst Speakers of English: Distributive and Relational Approaches
Shorten, A., & Morales‐Gálvez, S. (2026) · World Englishes · doi:10.1111/weng.70058
Niad, M. I. (2026) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.21259007
Power in Global Health: A Narrative Review, Relational Framework, and Systems-Based Analysis
Eshete, M. T., Tomson, G. B., Ottersen, O. P., Tomson, T., Wanyenze, R. K., Meng, Q., & Engebretsen, E. (2026) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.9698
Allegretti, A., & Galligan, B. P. (2026) · Advances in African economic, social and political development · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29966-6_14
Svirsky, L., Fried, M., Kim, M., MacEwan, S. R., Richards, N., Zettler, P. J., & Howard, D. (2026) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70165
Turkson, B. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7280618
Kolpa, N. E. M., Moran, N., Browne, J. L., & on behalf of the Community of Practice Study Group (2025) · Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1080/26410397.2026.2714691
Telling the Future: Radical Imagination, Questions to Ask, Answers to Find
Lynch, M. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29466-1_25
Human trafficking: How to fight a wicked problem with upstream disruptive policing strategies
van Rij, J., Szijártó, I., & Mohay, Á. (2026) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1177/0032258x261477642
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
