The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,201–11,300 of 12,257
Haunting the Profession: Exploring Experiences of Sexual Harassment in the Legal Profession
Gore, A., & Shahbazi, S. (2026) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/15570851261469129
Epistemic injustice in preventative cancer care for transgender individuals in the United States
Blumen, K., Mittendorf, K. F., Roth, S., Harris, R. M., Weiner, R. Q., & Zayhowski, K. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2026.2707307
Il contributo della Scienza Aperta per la promozione di una cultura di pace
Taddei, L., & Pennacchiotti, C. (2026) · WELFARE E ERGONOMIA · doi:10.3280/we2026-001-s1007
Epistemic Borderwork Beyond the State: Reading Christa Wolf
Mencke, C. (2026) · Theory Now Journal of Literature Critique and Thought · doi:10.30827/tn.v9i2.35149
Coates, J. K., Sharpe, L., Mason, C., Ruin, S., & Giese, M. (2026) · German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research · doi:10.1007/s12662-026-01141-5
Openness and Inequity in Scientific Research
Leonelli, S., Castaño, P., & Goldstein, R. B. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2682148
Onenyi, M. R., & Ademu, Y. (2026) · British Journal of Contemporary Research · doi:10.67693/bjcr-c4wysu99
IA et management des organisations en Afrique
Korgo, B. (2026) · BARTIMEE NET · doi:10.71003/sjpj8428
Kim, Y. (2026) · The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/10714413.2026.2706439
Akinola, A. S. (2026) · Liverpool Law Review · doi:10.1007/s10991-026-09421-8
Rihi, Y. (2026) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2026.2710465
The ‘Connecting Moment’: A Narrative Analysis of Late Awareness in Child Sexual Abuse Survivors
Pastor-Cerezo, V., & Cuéllar, A. I. (2026) · Child Abuse Review · doi:10.1002/car.70158
Divining the Waters: Capturing the Natural and the Conversational at the River’s Edge
Murphy, P. (2026) · Springer water · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15904-5_18
Listening in mental health: Practitioner listening practices in clinical mental health care settings
Aadam, B., Poon, A. W. C., & Fernandez, E. (2026) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcag142
Meyer, M. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2697185
Collective Attention Beyond Institutions: A Precision-Based Account of Digital Inference
H, D. S. R., & Vasudevan, A. (2026) · Computation · doi:10.3390/computation14080170
Tyler, R. (2026) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2026.2709808
Elisha‐Wigwe, O. K. U., Brubaker, E. R., & Schauer, A. M. K. (2026) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4072422
Panda, D. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6723660
Rats, Researchers, and the Mousetrap Gaze: How Participant Observation Never Stopped Being a TrapPreprint
Soler, G. V. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6900219
Coming into a queer education: lessons from intergenerational LGBTQ + dialogues
Greteman, A. J., Morris, K. A., Weststrate, N. M., & Fulop, M. (2026) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540253.2026.2710165
The Epistemic Puzzle of Digital Market RegulationPreprint
Grochowski, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6900118
Shepherd, N. J. (2026) · International Social Sciences and Education Journal · doi:10.61424/issej.v4i3.963
Duarte, A. L. P. (2026) · Revista de Ciências do Estado · doi:10.35699/2525-8036.2026.58699
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0008
Políticas públicas versus políticas sociales
Mballa, L. V. (2026) · Ediciones Comunicación Científica eBooks · doi:10.52501/cc.424
Jara, A. G. (2026) · IJAR – International Journal of Action Research · doi:10.3224/ijar.v22i1.04
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0001
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0009
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0003
Rahmatullah, M. (2026) · Eastern African Literary and Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/23277408.2026.2685894
Davy, J. W., Arnfred, B. T., Hjorthøj, C. R., Midtgaard, J., Nordentoft, M., & Melau, M. (2026) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-026-10433-4
Tamrazyan, H. S., Garambois, M., & Boroş, E. (2026) · Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Series 9 Current Trends in Language Development · doi:10.31392/udu-nc.series9.2026.31.09
Organizing Social Citizenship for People Living With Dementia: A Community Case Study
van Keulen, M., de Kok, J. L., Bal, R. A., & Pot, A. M. (2026) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012261471604
The Racial Politics of Listening
Granby, C. L. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.001.0001
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.002.0005
Race and Paternalistic Corruption
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0002
Epistemic Insensitivity, White Racial Contempt, and the Case for Epistemic Deference
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0004
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0010
The Ethics and Politics of Epistemic Deference
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0006
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0007
(Un)translatable feminisms? Language, resistance and the Southern African lexicon of struggle
Ndlovu, H. B., & Nhleko, C. N. (2026) · Feminist Translation Studies · doi:10.1080/29940443.2026.2711272
Charles, K. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01966-0
James Cone, Epistemic Callousness, and the Religion of Whiteness
Granby, C. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197850084.003.0005
Gender Mainstreaming in Mangrove Conservation
Natalis, A., & Purwanti, A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9320-9.ch011
Roldán, I. N. D. L. F., Burgos, J. G., & Sánchez-Moreno, E. (2026) · Revista de Estudios Sociales · doi:10.7440/res.11942
Why and how to create participatory digital twins for nature-based solutions?Preprint
Bukovszki, V., Glytsos, T., Valverde, N. J., & Kolokotsa, D. D. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7213857
Roy, P., Deslarzes, D. S., Kolly, H., & Kuettel, A. (2025) · Questions vives recherches en éducation · doi:10.4000/16nat
Abidli, Y. (2025) · Questions vives recherches en éducation · doi:10.4000/16naw
Flores, R. M. (2026) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006261465908
UniVoice: Dual RAG for Real-Time Lecture Translation in Multicultural Higher Education
Choi, S., Park, S., Lee, Y., & Kim, B. (2026) · OMNES The Journal of Multicultural Society · doi:10.64446/omnes.2026.07.16.2.01
Vivitsou, M., Eta, E. A., Karkkulainen, E. A., Woldegiorgis, E. T., & Niemi, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1935-3_19
« Décoloniser l’Esprit », Le Début D’une Posture Épistémologique Décoloniale en Recherche Clinique?
Tran, J. Q. N. (2026) · Clinical sociology review. · doi:10.36615/n1jads78
Wilsch, M., Hlinčíková, M., Tužinská, H., & Štefková, M. (2026) · Central and Eastern European Migration Review · doi:10.54667/ceemr.2026.14
What if Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Was Never for “Us”?: Re-Imagining DEI From the Cracks
Sawata, A. (2026) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.1080/2194587x.2026.2667394
Expressive Action, Meaning, and a New Threat to Deliberative Autonomy
Chipp-Miller, A., & Davia, C. (2026) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2026.10035
de Andrade, T. N., & Gobbi, M. C. (2025) · Revista de Ciências do Estado · doi:10.35699/2525-8036.2025.62403
Modernity, exclusion, and moral loss: A narrative inquiry into Indigenous lives
Misra, S. (2026) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/05390184261456843
An Adapted Scoping Review Protocol for Complex Fields
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_3
Governing Algorithmic Complexity
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_8
Articulating aspirational justice: Social policy, capability and the lived futures of migrant women
Zimmermann, B., Vieujean, O., & Baillergeau, É. (2026) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/02610183261473090
Complexity Science and Ethical Frameworks for Computational Governance
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_2
Empirical Validation: Testing the Complexity-Ethics Framework Through Institutional Practice
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_6
BRIDGE-E: A Complexity-Aware Framework for Policy Coherence
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_7
Mussie, K. M. (2026) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-026-00616-w
Empirical Manifestations of Translational Barriers in Developing Contexts
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_5
Brouwers, L., Duibhir, E., Stegeman, H. M., & Wright, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-1288-0_149
From Outlaw Emotions to Moral Injury: Rethinking the Affective Disruptions of Norms
Munch‐Jurišić, D. M., & Acampora, C. D. (2026) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-026-10442-1
Computational Applications in Energy Policy Analysis: Empirical Patterns and Translational Barriers
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_4
Salazar, S. G. S., & Tajafuerce, B. S. I. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261473910
Bridging Computational Techniques and Energy Policy Coherence
Bouderhem, R. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in energy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22978-6_1
Roul, P. P., Sharma, D. D., & Mishra, I. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7143618
Antuna-Casal, M., & Rios, M. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70151
Consent: Doctor, can you please do my operation?
Wickramasinghe, N. R., Clement, N. D., & Greenbrook, J. T. V. (2026) · Bone & Joint Open · doi:10.1302/2633-1462.78.bjo-2025-0294.r1
The Relational Turn in Sacred Space: A Phenomenological Mapping Framework
Sharma, V. C., & Dua, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18128-2_4
Juniper, W. (2026) · African Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/23743670.2026.2705508
Community perception of institutional failure in flood early warning systems in South Africa.Preprint
Mokhele, M. O., & Mvanyashe, A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10548126/v1
Éthique des vertus épistémiques
Lamy, E. (2026) · Revue d économie financière · doi:10.3917/ecofi.162.0135
Gutiérrez, P. A. A. (2026) · Intervención · doi:10.53689/int.v16i1.355
Practical Turn From Decoloniality to Decolonization: Bridging Scholarship and Practice
Andriamihaja, O. R., Ahene‐Codjoe, A. A., & Ngutu, M. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261475485
Digital Agents of Family Memory
Artamonov, D. S., & Алексеевна, Ш. С. (2026) · Galactica Media Journal of Media Studies · doi:10.46539/gmd.v8i3.768
Yardley, S. J., & French, M. (2026) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163261471306
Dissatisfied and Frustrated in Academia: Women Faculty Members' Experiences of Inequitable Workloads
Eckert, S., Aboulhassan, S., Neal, K. S., Albrehi, F., Gerring, N., & Brumley, K. M. (2026) · ADVANCE Journal · doi:10.5399/osu/advjrnl.7.3.5
Gomez-Rico, E. M., Ferrán-Ferrer, N., & Velilla, M. C. (2026) · Digital Library Perspectives · doi:10.1108/dlp-12-2025-0292
Trust me, I’m a doctor: a phenomenological account of epistemic privilege in the medical context
Spencer, L. J. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2706557
Speaking Carefully: Surveillance, Immigration Risk, and the Limits of Academic Freedom
Wolfgang, J. D., & Hossain, M. (2026) · Journal of Communication Inquiry · doi:10.1177/01968599261473205
Borah, P. (2026) · Contemporary Voice of Dalit · doi:10.1177/2455328x261472995
Who Owns the Truth? Scientific Legitimacy in the Age of Computational Governance
Bloomer, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24810-7_11
Pluriversal futures – ecological reparatory justice as a reparatory framework
Jules, T. D., Brissett, N. O. M., & Eugene, C. (2026) · The Round Table · doi:10.1080/00358533.2026.2708083
Dimitriou, D., Lagakou, L., Sartzetaki, M. F., Dimitriou, P., & Karagkouni, A. G. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence in Health · doi:10.36922/aih026240059
Testimony, legal epistemology, and #BelieveWomen
Mac, L. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05738-z
Cortez, M., Ragsag, A. B., Camargo, K., Vinluan, J., & Madulid, D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-23483-4_5
Zugai, J. S., Gill, K. H., Kinghorn, G., Ramjan, L. M., Salamonson, Y., & Molloy, L. (2026) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70324
Santo, M. K. D., Paunović, M., & Mitrašević, M. (2026) · Sustainable finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26008-6_5
Roberts, S., Elliott, K., & Prattes, R. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2026.2699300
Kiden, S., Peter, O., Reyes-Cruz, G., Klyshbekova, M., Choi, S., Bergin, A., Waheed, M., Eke, D., Azim, T., Ramchurn, S. D., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7228948
Cultural asymmetry in generative AI systems through the lens of Kazakh ethical philosophy
Turarbekova, L., Нурышева, Г., Azerbayev, A., & Amrebayeva, Z. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03195-3
Park, S. M. (. (2026) · Missiology An International Review · doi:10.1177/00918296261473224
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
