The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 11,601–11,700 of 12,257
Lobo, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2026.1807816
Radical Frameworks for Writing Transfer: Toward Epistemological Justice in Academic Writing Contexts
(2026) · The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado eBooks · doi:10.37514/per-b.2026.3071
Diartika, E. I. A., Maryam, S., & Thaariq, Z. Z. A. (2026) · Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJISE) · doi:10.30762/ijise.v5i2.8759
Henry, N., Umbach, R., Shelby, R. M., & Gonzalez‐Pons, K. M. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2723677
Aune, K. J. (2026) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2026.2717274
Mnguni, L. E., Nuangchalerm, P., Sari, I. J., Ramulumo, M., Camara, J. S., Biên, N. V., & Islami, R. A. Z. E. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02140-2
Normative Dilemmas in Value Sensitive Design and the Capability Approach Response
王, 颖. (2026) · Advances in Philosophy · doi:10.12677/acpp.2026.159438
Ramadan, O. M. E., Alshammari, A. M., Alshammari, A. O., Elsayed, G. E. A., Alasqah, I., & Shaban, H. T. E. M. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70166
Gil, N., Kerrison, R., Whitaker, K. L., McBride, E., & Cox, A. (2026) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-026-03008-5
From conceptual lacuna to conceptual distortion
Delgado-Verges, L. (2026) · European journal of analytic philosophy · doi:10.31820/ejap.22.2.3
The Epistemology and Semantics of Ignorance
Simion, M., Kelp, C., & Mace, L. (2026) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70156
Authors Must Have Intellectual Accountability and Thus Cannot Be ‘Brain-Dead’
Tang, B. L. (2026) · Medical Ethics and Bioethics · doi:10.3390/meb1010002
Boundary Policing in Climate Justice Media: Comparative Cases from Uganda, Brazil, and MexicoPreprint
Essien, E. O., Struthers, C., Agyapong, E., Bonilla, D. S. M., & Linda, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7443039
Johansson, F., Kupersmidt, J., & Höjemo, T. (2026) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2026.2727477
Marshall, F., & Gordon, A. L. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1916166
Ülgen, H. (2026) · Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education · doi:10.32674/xwmfgt05
Huot, S., & Chay, C. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1413-4.ch007
When Distress Goes Unseen: Mental Health Recognition Failures in Language-Discordant Consultations
Díaz, C. P., & García‐Santiago, F. A. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14182945
Anand, G. (2026) · Education Innovations Systems and Future Learning · doi:10.1108/eisfl-03-2026-0046
Phenomenology, epistemic practices, and patients’ experience of the psychiatric diagnostic interview
Nordgaard, J., Nielsen, K. M., Mølstrøm, I.-M., & Henriksen, M. G. (2026) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-026-10206-7
From policy transfer to policy plurality: pluriversal approaches to education policy-making
Hatipoglu, G. (2026) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2026.2732079
Caronia, L. (2026) · Dialogue studies · doi:10.1075/ds.36.09car
Ebihara, M., Ban, M., Tamura, T., Omiya, T., & Ando, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695
Youth research imagination: carving space for alternative knowing
Honkatukia, P., Kallio, J., & Ågren, S. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2026.2731451
Habermann, B., Walter, K., & Nehring, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2026.1906832
Epistemic Decentering: Freedom as an Event in the MindPreprint
Tavakolian, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7421499
Domingues, A., Schneider, M. H., & Quave, K. E. (2026) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439261481578
Gender and Sex Entanglement in Neuroscience: A Neurofeminist Perspective
Duchesne, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-40218-9_7
Hübinette, T., Iversen, C., & Strand, M. (2026) · Adoption Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10926755.2026.2730137
Degn, S., Nord, A., Gjøderum, A., & Møhl, B. (2026) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.70221
Count Backwards From Ten: Epistemic Injustice and the Patient as Expert in the Operating Theatre
Massard, O., & Kratzer, M. (2026) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.70609
Biermann, F., Hickmann, T., Kang, Y. H., Sénit, C., & Sun, Y. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003519560-12
Mikulcová, K. (2026) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2026.2723063
Villacís, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1869966
As-If Agents: Misrecognition and the Ethics of Non-Agentive AI
Neumann, S. J. (2026) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-026-00290-2
Banerjee, J. (2026) · Women s Studies · doi:10.1080/00497878.2026.2731221
McKinney, J. G. (2026) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENDER & WOMEN S STUDIES · doi:10.15640/ijgws.v14p3
Contextualism About Disability
Wilkenfeld, D. A., & Johnson, C. M. (2026) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.2735
Lissack, M. R. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01372-0
Poole, A., & Clark, J. S. (2026) · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1080/03057925.2026.2725884
Beverley, S.-A. (2026) · Critical criminological perspectives · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14942-8_2
Defining Medical Gaslighting—To Extinguish It
Janiszewski, C. M. S., Mosterd, D., Emerson, C., Mikocka‐Walus, A. A., & Grech, L. (2026) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-026-10787-8
Scrutton, A. P. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009622769
Shakir, S., Rabiger, P., & Govaerts, F. (2026) · Human Rights Education Review · doi:10.1080/25355406.2026.2734588
Structural injustice and disability: a relational egalitarian account
Brown, J. (2026) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2026.2729955
Justificatory Injustice: Epistemic Injustice in the Availability of Reasons
Mähringer, G. (2026) · Moral Philosophy and Politics · doi:10.1515/mopp-2025-0001
Pillai, A. (2026) · Indian Journal of Law and Technology · doi:10.55496/nfyv5618
The burden of the story: narratives of recovery and hermeneutical injustice
Latham, S., & Pinder, M. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2732215
Jha, P. (2026) · Women s Studies in Communication · doi:10.1080/07491409.2026.2727898
The architecture of unequal partnership: power, knowledge, and North–South research collaboration
Woldegiorgis, E. T. (2026) · Globalisation Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2026.2728100
Languaging as a Planetary Health Ethic: Toward Linguistic Justice in Global Ecological Governance
Dreisbach, J. L. (2026) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe17030032
Countering silences in the EHRI collection: a graph neural network approach for archival justice
Borrini, O. M., Papadopoulou, C., & Blanke, T. (2026) · International Journal of Digital Humanities · doi:10.1007/s42803-026-00134-y
Enhancing English comprehension through translanguaging in South African township classrooms
Mgqwashu, E., & Mataka, T. W. (2026) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccag042
Protests as World‐Making Projects
Dror, L., & Hirji, S. (2026) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.70068
Pemberton, A., & Mulder, E. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197698655.003.0011
Yamaguchi, T. (2026) · International Forum of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/0803706x.2026.2676595
Echoes of Apartheid: Truth-Telling as a Pedagogical Disruption
Subban, P. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83742-189-320261008
Abhishek, N. A., Nayak, K. M., Divyashree, M. S., & Jain, U. (2026) · Frontiers of digital education. · doi:10.1007/s44366-026-0102-2
Des biais individuels à la production des dominations
Heine, A. (2026) · La Revue Nouvelle · doi:10.3917/rn.266.0028
Schürmann, L., & Pfahl, L. (2026) · Subjektivierung und Gesellschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-52015-1_11
Yadav, M., & Nghiem, X. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-3653-2.ch004
Çelik, F. (2026) · Murmurations Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice · doi:10.28963/10.1.12
Pywell, S., Reynolds, K., & Kenyon, A. (2026) · Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.1108/jica-07-2025-0066
Segel, M., & Smith, K. P. (2026) · Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice · doi:10.1177/23813377261477006
A Critical History of Co‐Production in the Design and Delivery of UK Mental Health Services
Fleischmann, P., & Schofield, P. (2026) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70865
Early Clinical Mediation in End-of-Life Disputes: A Procedural Justice Analysis
Lioupi, O. (2026) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-026-00599-6
Epistemic Injustice in LLMs: Mind Audit and Intervention Based on Thought Attribution
Zhai, Y. (2026) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37199-7_4
Fibromyalgia beyond pain: a multisystemic dysregulation framework
Serrat, M., Estanyol, S., Cifre, D., Lizama-Lefno, A., Araya‐Quintanilla, F., Nieto, R., Suso‐Ribera, C., & Almirall, M. (2026) · Pain Management · doi:10.1080/17581869.2026.2734039
Adversarial Alignment in Argumentation
Liñán, J. L. (2026) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-026-09732-0
Epistemic injustices in teaching and research practices with children’s literature
González, M. G. (2026) · Children's literature, culture, and cognition · doi:10.1075/clcc.18.13gar
Neurodiverse spacetimemattering in a summer camp among neurodivergent youth: a mixed-methods study
Reutlinger, C., Koro‐Ljungberg, M., Pivovarova, M., Vasquez, A. M., Herneddo, O., & Thorn, S. D. (2026) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2026.2728966
Beyond Credibility Deficits: Credibility Excesses and Epistemic Justice in Older Adulthood
Olmedo, G., Caplan, A. L., & Quinn, G. P. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2717108
Sesay, M. G., Esq, S. E. K., & Fullah, M. A. (2026) · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2026.100800799
Guzñay, R. I. (2026) · Horizontes Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación · doi:10.33996/revistahorizontes.v10i43.1305
Tao, C. H., & Li, X. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-026-01759-2
Carbonell, V. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2717105
‘Relational epistemology and living law: an analysis of circles of women in Poland.’
Rodak, L. (2026) · Griffith Law Review · doi:10.1080/10383441.2026.2732701
van Wijngaarden, E. J., Ayalon, L., Berlinger, N., Connor, S. R., Donder, L. D., Dugdale, L. S., de la Fuente-Núñez, V., Harwood, R., Hoffman, J., Klein, A., et al. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2718380
Touch, trouble, trace: Found poetry and living literacies through material play
Leach, J., Bishop, M., & Reddington, S. (2026) · Journal of Early Childhood Literacy · doi:10.1177/14687984261487659
Blending a Participatory Approach Into Qualitative Research: Principles and Implementation Steps
Hutter, I., & Fenenga, C. (2026) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.167252
Unjust Aspects of the Epistemic Marketplace: Idea Appropriation, Bullshit, and Epistemic Injustice
Licon, J. A. (2026) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2026.10134
Mayer, K. (2026) · Cambridge Forum on AI Culture and Society · doi:10.1017/cfc.2026.10022
Extending Epistemic Injustice in Bioethics: Why Language Matters
Wallat, D., & Hille, E. M. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2717145
From Absence to Corrective Trust: Repairing Ageist-Ableist Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare
Zhang, J. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2717150
Suerdem, A. K., Zdravkov, S., & Ivanov, M. J. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0341946
London-Nadeau, K., Couture, L., Giroux, S., Difai, F. A., Nicolosi, M. N., Pérez, T., Savard, D., Chiniara, L., Coutu, M.-S., & Chadi, N. (2026) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.167175
Nombrar el daño: cartografía del abuso narcisista y su gramática relacional en redes sociales
Ainz-Galende, A. (2026) · Revista CENTRA de Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.54790/rccs.142
Rethinking Empowerment in Healthcare: A Dynamic Continuum
Beresford, C. J. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70167
Gilani, H. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2026.2733943
Who Gets Believed When Machines Read Pain? AI, Testimony and Nursing Judgement
Berdida, D. J. E. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70119
Xuebei, H. U. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119850
Cruz-Castillo, W. J., & Torrens-Rojas, E. (2026) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-026-10294-6
Negative capability as a component of critical literacy: Suspicion, suspension, sustenance
Takeda, Y. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2733627
Mapping the landscape of inequality: analyzing sources of privilege in Turkish academia
Yanıkoğlu, Ö., Kılıç, S., & Ergün, H. S. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qrom-12-2025-3260
The hidden curriculum of assessment: How testing systems reproduce inequality in African education
Kpum, M. M. (2026) · Insights into Regional Development · doi:10.70132/c6253342763
Mawere, J., & Mukonza, R. M. (2026) · International Journal of Development and Sustainability · doi:10.63212/ijds25102402
Rodrigues, J. A. M., D’Empaire, G., & Mújica, I. M. (2026) · EMJ Cardiology · doi:10.33590/emjcardiol/5w1ney91
Malik, F. S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01396-6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
