The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,001–4,100 of 12,257
The epistemology of thought experiments without exceptionalist ingredients
Irikefe, P. O. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03690-2 · Cited by 4
Guzmán, G. S., & Hernández, I. (2022) · Polis (Santiago) · doi:10.32735/s0718-6568/2022-n62-1625 · Cited by 4
Epistemic injustice and the veil: Islam, vulnerability, and the task of historical revisionism
Lynch, T. (2020) · Culture and Religion · doi:10.1080/14755610.2022.2115524 · Cited by 6
Kelp, C. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12223 · Cited by 4
Eddy, H. E. (2022) · Journal of Feminist Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/08952833.2022.2137996 · Cited by 4
Iris Murdoch and the Quality of Consciousness
Lovibond, S. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192856166.003.0012 · Cited by 4
Harris, K. R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03995-2 · Cited by 4
Beattie, A. R., & Bird, G. K. (2022) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac060 · Cited by 4
Structural white ignorance and education for racial justice
Nikolaidis, A. C. (2023) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785231162106 · Cited by 4
Reading Rage: Theorising the Epistemic Value of Feminist anger
Wallaert, S. (2023) · DiGeSt Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies · doi:10.21825/digest.85524 · Cited by 4
Surveying the landscape of college teaching about African American Language
Sedlacek, Q. C., Hudley, A. H. C., & Mallinson, C. (2023) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/j.linged.2023.101189 · Cited by 4
Epistemic justice of ChatGPT in first aid for child–adolescent mental health issues
Aditama, M. H. R., Wantah, M. E., Laras, P. B., & Suhardita, K. (2023) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdad098 · Cited by 4
Dowrick, A., Evered, J. A., de Souza, A. R. N. D., Thier, A., Conceição, M. I. G., Holmberg, C., & Mahtani‐Chugani, V. (2023) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100306 · Cited by 4
Re-Imagining Public Health Education: Students’ Perspectives and Considerations
Takenaka, B. P., Lee, Y.-C. J., Orakwue, K., Aaron, H. E., Reyna, K., & Putnam, N. I. (2023) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981231179501 · Cited by 4
Understanding Children’s Participation Rights Through a Postdigital Epistemology of Silence
Hanna, A. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_13 · Cited by 4
Mulder, M. (2023) · Museum Worlds · doi:10.3167/armw.2023.110103 · Cited by 4
Public Service Media: From Epistemic Rights to Epistemic Justice
Michalis, M., & D’Arma, A. (2024) · Global transformations in media and communication/Global transformations in media and communication research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45976-4_7 · Cited by 4
No Justice Without (Relational) Autonomy? Rethinking the Digital Empowerment Rhetoric
Proost, M. D., & Gray, J. (2024) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-024-00093-3 · Cited by 4
Sexual Fluency: Embedded Imaginaries and Unjust Sex
Churcher, M. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2023.107 · Cited by 4
Lacôte-Coquereau, C. (2024) · Éducation et socialisation · doi:10.4000/edso.26984 · Cited by 4
Malberg, N. T., & Gori, I. (2024) · Journal of Infant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/15289168.2024.2306460 · Cited by 4
Sliwa, P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198864523.003.0007 · Cited by 4
Habgood‐Coote, J., Ashton, N. A., & Kassar, N. E. (2024) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.5710 · Cited by 5
On the Intellectual Vice of Epistemic Apathy
Schwengerer, L., & Kotsonis, A. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2356574 · Cited by 4
Psychedelic therapies and belief change: are there risks of epistemic harm or epistemic injustice?
Zeller, M. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2362284 · Cited by 4
Digital Culture and the Hermeneutic Tradition
van de Ven, I., & Chateau, L. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003372790 · Cited by 5
Prendergast, N. (2024) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.12494 · Cited by 4
Dishaw, S. (2024) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12267 · Cited by 4
Fallacy as Foundation of Post-Truth Knowledge and Knowing in LIS
Youngman, T., & Patin, B. J. H. (2024) · Proceedings of the ALISE Annual Conference · doi:10.21900/j.alise.2024.1696 · Cited by 4
Uncharted Territory: Delving into Unexplored Knowledge to Curb Ableism in Academia
Schippers, A., Koning, M. H. M., & Cardinaal, L. (2024) · British Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1111/bld.12627 · Cited by 4
Philosophie und die Potenziale der Gender Studies
Kley, C., Landweer, H., Miller, S., & Newmark, C. (2012) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/transcript.9783839421529 · Cited by 4
‘On Bullshit’ and ‘Mindfucking’: an essay on mental manipulation in education
Horsthemke, K. (2014) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2014.892675 · Cited by 4
Literacies In/For Action: Prefigurative Pedagogies and Collective Knowledge Projects
Campano, G. (2013) · Literacy in Composition Studies · doi:10.21623/1.1.2.7 · Cited by 4
PEER DISAGREEMENT AND THE DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT
Wiland, E. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.18 · Cited by 4
Why Historical Injustice Must be Taught in Schools
Espíndola, J. (2016) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-016-9536-1 · Cited by 4
Shavit, A., & Silver, Y. (2016) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.60222 · Cited by 4
The caring refusenik: A portrait
Mihai, M. (2018) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12384 · Cited by 5
Ethics at the Intersection of Chronic Pain and Substance Use
Kofi, L. S., Sud, A., & Buchman, D. Z. (2018) · Developments in neuroethics and bioethics · doi:10.1016/bs.dnb.2018.08.007 · Cited by 4
Serving Two Masters: Ethics, Epistemology, and Taking People at their Word
Dannenberg, J. (2019) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2019.1566391 · Cited by 4
XII—Fighting for My Mind: Feminist Logic at the Edge of Enlightenment
Dawson, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoy016 · Cited by 4
Berthelot-Raffard, A. (2019) · Recherches féministes · doi:10.7202/1056244ar · Cited by 4
Taylor, R. M., & Kuntz, A. F. (2019) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/1943-5045-89.1.30 · Cited by 4
Global Gender Justice and Epistemic Oppression: A Response to an Epistemic Dilemma
Aragon, C. (2019) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7294 · Cited by 4
Rhetorical and Pedagogical Interventions for Countering Microaggressions
Diab, R., Godbee, B., Burrows, C. D., & Ferrel, T. (2019) · Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture · doi:10.1215/15314200-7615417 · Cited by 4
Bernard, C. (2019) · Études britanniques contemporaines · doi:10.4000/ebc.7401 · Cited by 4
Identity, Ethics, and the Deaf Community
Burke, T. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190887599.003.0003 · Cited by 5
Direct and Indirect Acts of Stigmatization
Gleason, J. (2019) · Journal of Social Ontology · doi:10.1515/jso-2019-0026 · Cited by 4
Creative enquiry and the clinical encounter
Younie, L., & Swinglehurst, D. (2019) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x707549 · Cited by 4
Rethinking the philosophy – literature distinction
Vidmar, I. (2019) · Rivista di estetica · doi:10.4000/estetica.5237 · Cited by 4
Djordjevic, C. (2020) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453720912291 · Cited by 4
Maladjusted to injustice? Political agency, medicalization, and the user/survivor movement
Degerman, D. (2020) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1745151 · Cited by 4
Shevchenko, S. Y. (2020) · Epistemology & Philosophy of Science · doi:10.5840/eps202057217 · Cited by 4
Embodied Integrity, Shaping Surgeries and the Profoundly Disabled Child
Fox, M., Thomson, M., & Warburton, J. (2020) · Palgrave socio-legal studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42200-4_12 · Cited by 4
1 The Trauma of Graduate Education
Godbee, B. (2020) · Utah State University Press eBooks · doi:10.7330/9781607329589.c001 · Cited by 4
McFadden, J., & Fuselier, L. (2020) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-020-00024-5 · Cited by 4
Democratic Practice and ‘Caring to Deliberate’: A Gadamerian Account of Conversation and Listening
Bourgault, S. (2020) · International political theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_2 · Cited by 4
Heffer, C. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190923280.003.0009 · Cited by 4
A case for integrative epistemology
Miracchi, L. J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02848-0 · Cited by 4
Transformative Power of Language Policies in Higher Education
Docrat, Z., & Kaschula, R. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.006 · Cited by 5
Corpora as Agency in the Intellectualisation of African Languages
Khumalo, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.014 · Cited by 4
Purcell, M. E., Page, J., & Reid, J. (2020) · Child & Youth Services · doi:10.1080/0145935x.2020.1820320 · Cited by 5
Moreira, A. L. C., & Conceição, M. I. G. (2020) · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/0102.3772e36nspe13 · Cited by 4
Ubuntu and African Disability Education
Gwaravanda, E. T. (2020) · Advances in religious and cultural studies (ARCS) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4867-7.ch001 · Cited by 4
Global (in)justice and the human right to housing. A practice-based approach
Kreide, R. (2020) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2020.1859225 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Injustice and Cultural Processes in Education
Göktürk, D. (2021) · Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.24106/kefdergi.732138 · Cited by 4
Striving for Balance in Economics: Towards a Theory of The Social Determination of Behavior
Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1596/24253 · Cited by 4
Expressive Freedom on Campus and the Conceptual Elasticity of Harm
D’Orazio, D. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423920000645 · Cited by 4
Educating for social justice in contemporary China: the politics of justice and injustice
Chen, S. (2021) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2021.1885347 · Cited by 4
Fenton, J. K. (2021) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2021.19 · Cited by 4
Cancer and Life Beyond It: Patient Testimony as a Contribution to Subjective Evidence
Bondio, M. G., & Herrmann, I. F. (2021) · Recent results in cancer research/Recent Results in Cancer Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63749-1_17 · Cited by 4
The epistemic foundations of injustice: lessons from the Young Marx
Casuso, G. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00813-x · Cited by 4
Porz, R. C., & Kerwien, C. (2021) · Springer Reference Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58685-3_3-1 · Cited by 4
Reflexiones feministas para otra investigación posible
García, A. L. M. (2020) · Cuadernos de teoría social. · doi:10.32995/0719-64232020v6n12-106 · Cited by 9
Crerar, C. (2020) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaa072 · Cited by 4
A Normative Framework for Sharing Information Online
Sullivan, E., & Alfano, M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.5 · Cited by 4
Urban analytics: History, trajectory and critique
Boeing, G., Batty, M., Jiang, S., & Schweitzer, L. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781789903942.00039 · Cited by 4
Feeling Wronged: The Value and Deontic Power of Moral Distress
Bagnoli, C. (2021) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-021-10241-0 · Cited by 4
Sbardolini, G. (2021) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqab071 · Cited by 4
Ballantyne, N. (2021) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2020.39 · Cited by 4
Finding meaning in the hidden curriculum – the use of the hermeneutic window in medical education
Shah, R., Clarke, R., Ahluwalia, S., & Launer, J. (2022) · Education for Primary Care · doi:10.1080/14739879.2022.2047112 · Cited by 4
Universal enfranchisement for citizens with cognitive disabilities – A moral-status argument
Schidel, R. (2022) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2022.2062212 · Cited by 4
When and why to empathize with political opponents
Read, H. (2022) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-022-01837-y · Cited by 5
Feminist bioethics and empirical research
Carter, S. M., & Entwistle, V. A. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003016885-26 · Cited by 4
Favero, S. R., Machado, P. S., & Freitas, R. V. (2022) · Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro) · doi:10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2022.38.e22306.a · Cited by 4
Binarism Grammatical Lacuna as an Ensemble of Diverse Epistemic Injustices
Carmona, C. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2103473 · Cited by 4
Towards an epistemology of cultural learning
McMyler, B. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12212 · Cited by 4
Perspectivas feministas para la bioética
Sanín, M. L. R. (2022) · Revista Colombiana de Bioética · doi:10.18270/rcb.v17i2.3864 · Cited by 4
The Politics of Relevant Alternatives
Tuckwell, W. (2022) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2022.53 · Cited by 4
Malm, C., Jönson, H., Andersson, S. K., & Hanson, E. J. (2023) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/239788221x16740618578816 · Cited by 4
Brake, E. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198877639.003.0002 · Cited by 4
Change without Change: Remaking Mental Health Advocacy in Bulgaria
Димитрова, И. (2023) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2023.2220144 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Injustice and the Electoral Connection
Pottle, J. (2023) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12806 · Cited by 5
Más allá de los datos: la transformación digital del museo tradicional
Pinillos, A. S., & Costa, V. (2023) · Daímon · doi:10.6018/daimon.563231 · Cited by 4
Dewey’s Notion of Intelligent Habit as a Basis for Ethical Assessment of Technology
Wieczorek, M. (2023) · Contemporary Pragmatism · doi:10.1163/18758185-bja10074 · Cited by 4
Taher, S. (2023) · Politique et Sociétés · doi:10.7202/1108193ar · Cited by 4
Kitambaa: A Convivial Future-Oriented Framework for Kinangop’s Learning Hub
Kühn, C., Warui, M., & Kimani, D. K. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14050465 · Cited by 4
Ethnic Minority Inclusion in Well-Being Research: Beyond Widening Participation
Esmene, S., Leyshon, M., & Leyshon, C. (2024) · International Journal of Community Well-Being · doi:10.1007/s42413-024-00221-4 · Cited by 4
Am I Still Young at 20? Online Bubbles for Epistemic Activism
Vizuete, L. M., & Barbarrusa, D. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10093-0 · Cited by 4
The Prudential Value of Forgiveness
Ingram, S. (2013) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-013-9451-4 · Cited by 4
Perfectioning trust, reinforcing testimony
Francisco Javier, G. I. L. (2008) · THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science · doi:10.1387/theoria.8 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
