The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,901–4,000 of 12,257
The paradox of epistemic ability profiling
Taylor, A. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad066 · Cited by 4
“White Empiricism” and “The Racialization of Epistemology in Physics”: A Critical Analysis*
Sokal, A. D. (2023) · Journal of Controversial Ideas · doi:10.35995/jci03020001 · Cited by 4
Ko, D., Bal, A., Lim, S., & Orie, L. (2023) · The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/10714413.2023.2281191 · Cited by 5
Hunt, J. (2023) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2023.2295800 · Cited by 4
Yang, Y., Zhang, T., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50670-3_18 · Cited by 5
Cultivating Critical Love to Improve Black Maternal Health Outcomes
Ogunwole, S. M., & Starks, F. D. (2024) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2024.72 · Cited by 4
Parmanand, S. (2024) · TRaNS Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia · doi:10.1017/trn.2023.13 · Cited by 4
Willful testimonial injustice as a form of epistemic injustice
Hänel, H. C. (2024) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12928 · Cited by 5
Phyak, P. B. (2024) · International Journal of the Sociology of Language · doi:10.1515/ijsl-2023-0026 · Cited by 4
Xu, L. (2024) · New Review of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1080/13614533.2024.2306366 · Cited by 4
Transformative Equity: Promoting systemic change through a new evaluation criterion
Norins, J., Africa, M., Jason, D., Goldman, I., Moshia-Molebatsi, K., Tsekiso, S., Lukuko, T., Climate Action Network South Africa, Brey, Z., & Economics, D. (2023) · Evaluation: African perspectives. · doi:10.4102/aosis.2023.bk459.11 · Cited by 4
Unlearning Imperialism Through Artistic Remediation: A Critical Pedagogy Approach
Mendes, A. C. (2024) · Critical Arts · doi:10.1080/02560046.2024.2312434 · Cited by 4
Using co-design to develop the Adolescent Health Literacy Questionnaire for adolescents in Ireland
Naigaga, D. A., Kavanagh, J., Spillane, A., Hickey, L., Scott, K. L., Morrissey, J., Elmer, S., Goss, H. R., & Murrin, C. M. (2024) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daae009 · Cited by 4
Chambon, N., & Picolet, É. (2024) · Rhizome · doi:10.3917/rhiz.088.0006 · Cited by 4
Injustices épistémiques en santé : une introduction
Godrie, B., & Gross, O. (2024) · Éducation et socialisation · doi:10.4000/edso.26840 · Cited by 8
reclaiming misandry from misogynistic rhetoric
Hedges, T. (2024) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1177/01417789231223202 · Cited by 4
Ratcliffe, J. (2024) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12949 · Cited by 5
Casla, K., & Barker, L. (2024) · Journal of Human Rights Practice · doi:10.1093/jhuman/huae009 · Cited by 4
Morgan, R. (2024) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqae046 · Cited by 4
A Right to Know? Using Access to Information as Method in Critical Criminological Research
Mario, B., & Kilty, J. M. (2024) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004241256140 · Cited by 4
Au croisement de la justice environnementale et épistémique
Bucolo, E. (2024) · Sociographe · doi:10.3917/graph1.086.0039 · Cited by 4
Building Epistemically Healthier Platforms
Amico-Korby, D., Harrell, M., & Danks, D. J. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.22 · Cited by 4
Nardo, J. E. (2024) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d4rp00067f · Cited by 4
Conceptual engineering and the dynamics of linguistic intervention
Gibbons, A. F. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2367251 · Cited by 4
Scranton, B., & Doherty, M. J. (2024) · Clinical Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10615-024-00946-x · Cited by 4
Alzheimer’s Disease: Engaging with an Unstable Category
Daly, T. P., & Keuck, L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8706-2_113-1 · Cited by 5
Páez, A., & Arcila-Valenzuela, M. (2023) · Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho · doi:10.5347/isonomia.59/2023.653 · Cited by 4
Democratic Equality Beyond Deliberation
Pottle, J. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000637 · Cited by 4
Developing Disobedience: A Decolonial Childist Perspective on School Strikes for Climate Justice
Biswas, T., & Mattheis, N. (2024) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642241268596 · Cited by 6
Herméneutique et injustice épistémique dans la recherche en santé mentale et en éthique
Quintin, J. (2023) · Ethica Revue interdisciplinaire de recherche en éthique · doi:10.7202/1112392ar · Cited by 4
The horror of corporate harms: purdue pharma and the opioid epidemic
Crofts, P., & van Rijswijk, H. (2024) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-024-10164-8 · Cited by 4
Kant on public reason and the linguistic Other
Lu‐Adler, H. (2024) · Asian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s44204-024-00178-3 · Cited by 4
Moral Justification and Structural Epistemic Injustice
Jaggar, A. M., & Tobin, T. W. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198892878.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Environmental justice in education for climate action: Case studies from Perú and Uganda
Wilder, R., Nuwategeka, E., Monge, C., & Talavera, A. B. (2024) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.12899 · Cited by 4
Listening to the voices of the medically silenced
Dhairyawan, R. (2024) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003761 · Cited by 4
Deception Detection Research: Some Lessons for the Epistemology of Testimony
Graham, P. J. (2024) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74069-5_10 · Cited by 4
Trans experiences of epistemic recognition against the backdrop of the Finnish trans act reform
Heimonen, M., & Pantti, M. (2024) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494241287934 · Cited by 6
Ameliorating Epistemic Injustice with Digital Health Technologies
Lalumera, E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-68881-2_8 · Cited by 4
Adelman, M., Liou, D. D., Langerud, C., Rady, M., & Moorthy, S. (2024) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2024.2426302 · Cited by 5
The Epistemic Fata Morgana: Appropriation in the Institutional Context
Kok, S. G. (2024) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2024.91 · Cited by 4
Community-Engaged Scholarship and Its Implications for Public Sociology and the Discipline
London, R. A., Hartmann, D., Plankey-Videla, N., Borland, E., & Glasser, C. L. (2024) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spae072 · Cited by 4
Mutanga, O., & Haihambo, C. K. (2024) · African Identities · doi:10.1080/14725843.2024.2440083 · Cited by 4
Equity-centered knowledge brokering: taking stock of challenges, strategies, and possibilities
Malin, J. R., & Shewchuk, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1436150 · Cited by 5
Elbaz, S., & Wiseman, H. (2025) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x241312238 · Cited by 4
Tyni, K., Wurm, M., & Bratt, A. S. (2025) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2024.2440864 · Cited by 4
Promises and perils of water sensitivity as a new hydro-social imaginary for Kozhikode, India
Silva, R. H., van der Meulen, G. J. M., Zwarteveen, M., Stead, D., van Dorst, M. J., & Bacchin, T. K. (2025) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103985 · Cited by 4
Drolet, M.-J., Blais, J., & Whiteford, G. E. (2023) · French Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.60856/fjot-2023-1-1-0016 · Cited by 4
Linguistic Variation, Agency, and Style
Camp, E., & Nowak, E. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192856852.013.2 · Cited by 4
Epistemic reparations and postcolonial pedagogy: some conceptual decluttering
Horsthemke, K. (2025) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2025.2465093 · Cited by 4
AI, Digital Humanities, and the Legacies of Colonial Power
Karpouzis, K. C. (2026) · Learning and analytics in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05099-1_4 · Cited by 4
Intellectual Humility Without Open-Mindedness: How to Respond to Extremist Views
Peters, K., Turner, C., & Battaly, H. D. (2025) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2024.63 · Cited by 4
Affective Archives of the Disappeared
Baines, E. K., & Anyeko, K. (2024) · Global Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksaf017 · Cited by 4
Youth Climate Action and Education
Karsgaard, C. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197762097.013.0036 · Cited by 4
Why Education Matters for a Climate-Resilient Africa
Mbah, M. F., & Liberty, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84081-4_2 · Cited by 4
Performing Arts and Affordances: Moving toward Epistemic Justice through Embodied Learning
Zimmermann, C., Poirier, P., & Catala, A. (2025) · The British Journal of Aesthetics · doi:10.1093/aesthj/ayaf004 · Cited by 4
Analysis of the Nine-Tenths Mentoring Programme’s role in decolonising higher education in Makhanda
Machiha, N. (2025) · African Journal of Higher Education Community Engagement · doi:10.21504/ajhece.v1i3.2524 · Cited by 4
Who speaks for whom? The right to the word and why it matters
Casar, M., & Noguera, J. (2025) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2025.2503296 · Cited by 4
The governmentalisation of personal digital archives in asylum procedures
Josipović, I. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2492350 · Cited by 4
Hofmeyr, J. H. (2025) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105715 · Cited by 4
Fraser, H. (2025) · Australian Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1080/07268602.2025.2548998 · Cited by 4
Global production networks: A geographical review of a research tradition
Gyuris, F., Borbély, G., & Kocsi, V. A. (2025) · Hungarian Geographical Bulletin · doi:10.15201/hungeobull.74.3.5 · Cited by 4
Wicked Labels, and the Power of Narrative in Mental Health Nursing
Haslam, M., Wright, K. M., Lamph, G., & McKeown, M. (2025) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.70040 · Cited by 4
SINCERITY, ACCURACY AND SELECTIVE CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION
Navin, M. C. (2013) · Journal of Military Ethics · doi:10.1080/15027570.2013.818404 · Cited by 4
Persecutory delusions and first-person authority
Kumazaki, T. (2014) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354314553152 · Cited by 4
What Lies Ahead: Envisioning New Futures for Feminist Philosophy
Intemann, K. K., Lee, E. S., McCartney, K., Roshanravan, S., & Schriempf, A. T. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01136.x · Cited by 4
Knowing Our Own Hearts: Self‐Reporting and the Science of Love
Jenkins, C. (2016) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12069 · Cited by 4
The ends of cutting in Ghana: Blood loss, scarcity, and slow harm after NGOs
Hodžić, S. (2016) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12380 · Cited by 4
Can jinn be a tonic? The therapeutic value of spirit-related beliefs, practices and experiences
Scrutton, A. P. (2016) · Filosofia Unisinos · doi:10.4013/fsu.2016.172.12 · Cited by 4
Public Justification, Inclusion, and Discursive Equality
Besch, T. M. (2017) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217317000646 · Cited by 4
Lo, R. S. (2018) · Global Studies of Childhood · doi:10.1177/2043610618758404 · Cited by 4
Adams, S. E., & Myran, S. (2021) · Improving Schools · doi:10.1177/13654802211019915 · Cited by 7
The Political Economy of Legal Knowledge in Action: Collaborative Projects in the Americas
Maldonado, D. B., & Crawford, C. (2018) · International and development education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75364-5_6 · Cited by 4
Unravelling the gender bind, uncovering the heterogeneity of domination
Murphy, S. P., Shilla, D. J., Chua, C. L., Raphael, C., O’Rourke, N., & Middlehurst-Schwartz, M. (2018) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050068.2018.1543378 · Cited by 4
Artistic memory and Roma women’s history through an intersectional lens: The Giuvlipen Theater
Asavei, M. A. (2019) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/1350506819846163 · Cited by 4
Glass, R. D., & Stoudt, B. G. (2019) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.27.4470 · Cited by 4
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Skordos, D., & Barner, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.1 · Cited by 4
Resources, Rules, and Oppression
Engelhardt, J. (2019) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12497 · Cited by 4
Kopec, M. (2019) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.018 · Cited by 4
A Modified Self-Knowledge Model of Thought Insertion
Rothenfluch, S. (2019) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00449-6 · Cited by 4
Spinoza’s Conception of Personal and Political Change: A Feminist Perspective
Richardson, J. (2020) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-019-09255-6 · Cited by 4
Evidential participles and epistemic vigilance
Cruz, M. P. (2020) · Figurative thought and language · doi:10.1075/ftl.8.03crz · Cited by 4
Daniels-Mayes, S. (2020) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5351-6_4 · Cited by 4
Introduction Valuing Lived Experiences and Community Mentorship
Madden, S. (2020) · Utah State University Press eBooks · doi:10.7330/9781607329589.c000 · Cited by 4
Culpable Ignorance, Professional Counselling, and Selective Abortion of Intellectual Disability
Gould, J. B. (2020) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-020-09984-9 · Cited by 4
Pogin, K. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198848844.003.0008 · Cited by 4
Aristizábal, A. B., & Walker, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0_10 · Cited by 4
On the Amelioration of “Women”
Chen, H.-Y. (2021) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00308-0 · Cited by 4
Wood, W. D. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198779872.003.0005 · Cited by 4
Knowledge as a collective status
Koons, J. R. (2021) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12224 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Oppression, Ignorance, and Resistance
Pohlhaus, G. M. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.013.33 · Cited by 4
The ‘Fusion Law’ Proposals and the CRPD
Dawson, J., & SZMUKLER, G. I. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.009 · Cited by 4
Yanik, A. A. (2021) · MIR (Modernization Innovation Research) · doi:10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.222-253 · Cited by 4
Translation as epistemicide: conceptual limits and possibilities
Price, J. M. (2021) · Palimpsestes · doi:10.4000/palimpsestes.7405 · Cited by 4
Africanisation of Epistemology in the 21st Century University in Africa
Ndofirepi, A. P. (2014) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-836-7_11 · Cited by 4
On Public‐identity Disempowerment*
Valentini, L. (2021) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12269 · Cited by 5
Read, H. (2021) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2021.1974364 · Cited by 4
Brooks, P. J., & Parshina, O. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.5 · Cited by 4
Vargas, M. L., Aristizábal, A. B., & García, L. M. Z. (2022) · Journal of Global Ethics · doi:10.1080/17449626.2022.2079707 · Cited by 4
López, M. D. R. A., Castillo, M. C. S., Daza, J. D. F., Sánchez-Negrette, Y. J., & Uribe, S. C. (2022) · Estudios de Filosofía · doi:10.17533/udea.ef.349487 · Cited by 7
Same-Sex Parenting in Contemporary Italy: Constructing Parenthood on Insecure Grounds
Mónaco, S., & Nothdurfter, U. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05367-2_12 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
