The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,801–3,900 of 12,257
Jerwood, J., & Allen, G. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251360307 · Cited by 4
Devesa, B. P. (2025) · Asian Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1080/12259276.2025.2541572 · Cited by 4
Grief-bots and affective paternalism: a case against restriction
Podosky, P. C. (2025) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-025-10092-5 · Cited by 4
Generative AI and Democratic Culture
Branford, J., Soulier, E., & Fichtner, L. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00953-x · Cited by 5
Unmet needs, unjust journeys: Exploring mobility injustice perceptions among disadvantaged groups
Haxhija, S., & Geliş, E. (2025) · Journal of Transport Geography · doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104396 · Cited by 4
Teaching Otherwise: Decolonial Pedagogies in Brazilian Language and Literature Classrooms
Russell, E. S. (2025) · Equity in Education & Society · doi:10.1177/27526461251371310 · Cited by 4
Waldock, K. E., & Khan, R. (2025) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16091113 · Cited by 4
Pinheiro, W. A. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15091116 · Cited by 6
Critical metabolism: Towards a metabolic justice?
Hinchliffe, S., Grünfeld, M., Rose, A., Dolezal, L., Green, J., DeSilvey, C., Rashid, S. F., Matta, G. C., Moore, M. D., Lynch, R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Critical Public Health · doi:10.55016/ojs/jcph.v2i2.79003 · Cited by 4
Mitova, V. (2025) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-025-02406-9 · Cited by 4
Lizandra, J., Valencia‐Peris, A., Ferriz, R., & Velert, C. P. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13182362 · Cited by 4
Epistemic Injustice, Medicine, and Gender
Byrne, E. A., & de Boer, M. L. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197625835.013.0015 · Cited by 5
The WHO and the ‘whose values?’ problem: on the partial democratisation of science
Cairns, M. (2025) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-025-00675-z · Cited by 4
Relations matter: towards relational egalitarianism in transport
Piazza, A., & Martens, K. (2025) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2025.2550447 · Cited by 4
Isern‐Mas, C., & Almagro, M. (2025) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-025-09730-5 · Cited by 4
The Structure of the Open Society
Hindriks, F. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197815182.001.0001 · Cited by 4
High politics, low visibility: a computational analysis of gender discourse in EU institutions
Yılmaz, A., & McCallion, A. (2025) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2025.2566669 · Cited by 4
Heuling, D. S., Jakobi, A. P., Schaal, G. S., & Gerlich, M. (2025) · Politische Vierteljahresschrift · doi:10.1007/s11615-025-00631-9 · Cited by 4
Contreras, R. P. P., Zhao, Z., & Zhang, G. (2025) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-025-00480-1 · Cited by 4
González-Recio, P., Armstrong, L., Alonso-Colón, M., Padilla, M., Bustillos, A., Belza, M. J., & Moreno‐García, S. (2025) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2025.2573833 · Cited by 4
Equitable mosaic: the ideal for medical pluralism
Lakshmi, J. K. (2025) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-025-00185-z · Cited by 4
A New Direction for Epistemic Injustice in Business
Lobo, M. (2025) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2025.10084 · Cited by 4
Therapy without faith: Muslim clients' experience of religious exclusion and minimisation in therapy
Islam, R., & Chadwick, P. (2025) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.70019 · Cited by 5
McKeown, A., Glasgow-Osment, B., Campbell, H., & Modanloo, S. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/08445621251367812 · Cited by 4
Democratic Didactics in Digitalized Higher Education: The DEA Framework for Teaching and Learning
Hummel, S. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111499 · Cited by 4
Contested and neglected: Social and medical marginalization in severe Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Nezamdoust, B., & Ruel, E. E. (2025) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118766 · Cited by 4
Signifying the Autistic Sense of Self
Hughes, E. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10318-w · Cited by 4
Stroud, R. (2025) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.70075 · Cited by 4
Pain, Power, and Policing: Emotional Injustice in Healthcare
Pismenny, A. (2025) · Bioethics · doi:10.1111/bioe.70057 · Cited by 4
Greenhalgh, T., Helm, R. K., Poliseli, L., Ratnayake, S., Trofimov, A., & Williamson, J. (2025) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-025-02973-2 · Cited by 5
Yarbrough, C., & Smith‐Colin, J. (2025) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2025.2585037 · Cited by 4
Martin, F., Kalisa, J., Isingizwe, B. B., Gashugi, Y., Cheonga, F., Ishimwe, E., Uwizeye, P., Wicker, S., Ong, S. Y., Gishoma, D., et al. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03676-y · Cited by 4
Iskandar, K., Kotb, R. E., Cherfane, M., Yeretzian, J. S., Dib, J. B., Chahine, B., Hallit, S. R., Amin, R., Bahlol, M., Fekih‐Romdhane, F., et al. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14121212 · Cited by 4
The Politics of Self-narration: Self-Diagnosis as Digital Counter-Narrative
Russo, G., & Ferraro, M. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10338-6 · Cited by 4
Craig, E., Leah, C., Dixon, J., Bergqvist, A., Brodrick, I., Best, D., Heyes, K., Duxbury, J. A., & Haines‐Delmont, A. (2025) · PLOS mental health. · doi:10.1371/journal.pmen.0000457 · Cited by 5
The Social Aspects and Impacts of Long COVID
Lupton, D. A. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9168-5_1 · Cited by 4
Calabrese, L., Brigiano, M., Quartarone, M., Chirico, I., Trolese, S., Lambiase, F., Forte, L., Annini, A., Bortolotti, L., & Chattat, R. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08519-y · Cited by 4
Epistemic rights in tension and accord: Expanding the analysis of source evaluation criteria
Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Elby, A. (2025) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2025.2584975 · Cited by 5
Roche, G. (2025) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1177/25739581251408623 · Cited by 4
The Algorithmic Construction of Epistemic Injustice
McInerney, T. (2025) · Palgrave socio-legal studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07581-9_5 · Cited by 6
Fakunle, D. O., & Delgado, L. M. H. (2026) · American Journal of Qualitative Research · doi:10.29333/ajqr/17412 · Cited by 4
The Stigma of self-report in health research: Time to reconsider what counts as “Objective”
Alwan, N. A. (2026) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005521 · Cited by 4
Boden, Z., & Thompson, R. (2026) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2026.100234 · Cited by 4
Personalised LLMs and the risks of the digital twin metaphor
Annoni, M., Battisti, D., & Marchegiani, B. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02875-4 · Cited by 5
Workplace bullying as the erosion of recognition: ethnographic insights from a Schutzian perspective
Hernáez, Á. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1735370 · Cited by 4
Karki, J., Barros, S. R., & Ojha, L. P. (2026) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2025.2598286 · Cited by 4
Understanding the ABS journal ranking system: a critical review
Teymourifar, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1773655 · Cited by 4
Williams, T. L., Gabriel, A., Falcon, T., Bunbury, S., Marks, K., Bigord, N., Edwards, R. T., Voyle, C., & Whawell, S. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2026.2616516 · Cited by 6
Beyond inclusion: are clinical trials solving the right problem?
Kirk, U. B., Georgiou, N., Hillel, R., & Moraga, P. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09583-w · Cited by 4
Yazidi Stories: A Case Study of Resistance, Resilience and Political Erasure in Mesopotamia
Usman, S. M. (2026) · Australian Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1017/aee.2026.10148 · Cited by 4
Seleke, B. (2026) · E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.20267118 · Cited by 4
Santana, J., Arcuri, A. G., Velloso, L., Lopes, M. M., Brondino-Pompeo, K. L., de Morais, I. C., Cross, S. N. N., Figueiredo, B., Ger, G., Hein, W., et al. (2026) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2026.2638886 · Cited by 4
Recognizing epistemic injustice in healthcare: a case for methodological pluralism
Færge, S., Muldtofte, L., Ustrup, M., Mikkelsen, A. K. K., & Speyer, H. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10342-6 · Cited by 4
Preserved Dissonance as an Extension of Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Ahmed, H. M. (2026) · Culture & Psychology · doi:10.1177/1354067x261434584 · Cited by 4
Bhanye, J. I. (2026) · Environment and Urbanization · doi:10.1177/09562478261423458 · Cited by 4
Breaking the silence: oral history as an anti-stigma intervention in community mental health
Palmer, D. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07207-x · Cited by 4
From Care to Justice: Reframing Nursing Education Through Relational Ethics and Epistemic Inclusion
Assem-Erhaze, E. K. (2026) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.70082 · Cited by 4
Dalmo, M. O. V. (2026) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2026.2659101 · Cited by 4
Ars Longa, Data Brevis: the science of disease and the art of care
Erbay, H., Ghotbi, N., & Shamim, M. S. (2026) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-026-10372-0 · Cited by 4
Ammari, T. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119593 · Cited by 5
Active Ignorance, Epistemic Others, and Epistemic Friction
Medina, J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.003.0001 · Cited by 4
Democracia, concordia y deliberación pública en la" Política" de Aristóteles”
Madrid, N. S. (2018) · Logos Anales del Seminario de Metafísica · doi:10.5209/asem.61642 · Cited by 4
Islamitische scholen en indoctrinatie
Merry, M. S., & Maussen, M. (2018) · Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid · doi:10.5553/tvrrb/187977842018009003002 · Cited by 4
Justice in education and recognitive justice
Hanhela, T. (2018) · Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi · doi:10.7146/spf.v7i2.117454 · Cited by 4
Liberal Nationalism and the Challenge of Essentialism
Moore, M. R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0011 · Cited by 5
Testimonial Injustice and a Case for Mindful Epistemology
Maitra, K. (2020) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/sjp.12348 · Cited by 4
Scientific Communities. A History of Theories and Concepts
Arnold, M. (2020) · Vienna Circle Institute yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40947-0_18 · Cited by 4
Miranda, C., Goñi, J., Pickenpack, A., & Sotomayor, T. (2021) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09653-x · Cited by 4
Elise Reimarus on Freedom and Rebellion
Winegar, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108647441.007 · Cited by 4
Epistemische Gerechtigkeit und epistemische Offenheit – eine Versöhnung
Döring, S. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62892-8_4 · Cited by 4
Reflective equilibrium is enough: against the need for preselecting considered judgements
Rechnitzer, T., & Schmidt, M. (2022) · Ethics Politics & Society · doi:10.21814/eps.5.2.210 · Cited by 4
Epistemic insouciance, souciance, and hypersouciance
Morvan, P. L. (2021) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12241 · Cited by 4
Reparation for Psychiatric Violence: A Call to Justice
Minkowitz, T. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.006 · Cited by 4
De la prise de parole à l’émancipation des usagers
Carrel, M., & Rosenberg, S. (2021) · Presses de l’EHESP eBooks · doi:10.3917/ehesp.petia.2021.01.0239 · Cited by 4
Hornby, D., & Maistry, S. M. (2022) · Palgrave studies in education research methods · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86402-6_6 · Cited by 4
Deigan, M. (2022) · Philosophers Imprint · doi:10.3998/phimp.2117 · Cited by 5
Injusticia epistémica. Una nueva epistemología para una antigua injusticia
Garzón, C., & Acosta, D. (2022) · Estudios de Filosofía · doi:10.17533/udea.ef.349967 · Cited by 5
Social Work - Perspectives on Leadership and Organisation
Wolmesjö, M. (2022) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96846 · Cited by 4
Clover, D. E. (2022) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004518032_007 · Cited by 4
Melioristic genealogies and Indigenous philosophies
Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2022) · The Philosophical Forum · doi:10.1111/phil.12327 · Cited by 4
Carmona, C. (2022) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2022.48 · Cited by 4
Beetham, T., Turley, E. L., Lazard, L., Thompson, L., & Donnelly, L. C. (2021) · Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review · doi:10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.6 · Cited by 4
The Hermeneutics of Hospitality for Epistemic Justice
Ku, E. A.-R. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14020132 · Cited by 4
Lefrançois, M., Sultan‐Taïeb, H., Webb, J., Gervais, M.-J., Messing, K., Blanchette-Luong, V., Riel, J., Saint-Charles, J., Faust, R., Vaillancourt, C., et al. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.17269/s41997-023-00742-z · Cited by 6
Considering the moral implications of psychiatric diagnosis for children
Isobel, S. (2023) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.12694 · Cited by 4
Gender and first-person authority
Turyn, G. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04125-2 · Cited by 4
Bernard, C. F., Kaufman, D. K., Kohan, M., & Mitoma, G. (2023) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.31.7597 · Cited by 4
van Buuren, J. (2023) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639231173669 · Cited by 4
Delineating Anti-Blackness in Engineering Education Research Methodology
Holly, J., Cross, K., & Lee, W. C. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003287483-33 · Cited by 4
Epistemic justice and experiential self
Hari Narayanan, V. (2023) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-023-00297-z · Cited by 4
Undoing epistemic violence in religious leadership in African theological education
Naidoo, M. (2023) · Practical Theology · doi:10.1080/1756073x.2023.2219922 · Cited by 4
No Need for Parental Involvement in the Vaccination Choice of Adolescents
Brusa, M., & Barilan, Y. M. (2023) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-023-10252-9 · Cited by 4
Graffiti Writing as Creative Activism: Getting Up, Sheeplike Subversion, and Everyday Resistance
Baldini, A. (2023) · Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.1093/jaac/kpad001 · Cited by 4
Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Responsibility
Brogaard, B. “. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198866749.003.0009 · Cited by 4
Lian, O. S., Nettleton, S., Grange, H., & Dowrick, C. F. (2023) · Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine · doi:10.1177/13634593231188489 · Cited by 4
Sexual Agency and Sexual Wrongs: A Dilemma for Consent Theory
Rees, M., & Ichikawa, J. J. (2023) · Philosophers Imprint · doi:10.3998/phimp.2530 · Cited by 4
Werner, K. (2023) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-023-00732-0 · Cited by 4
Skeen, S. J., Tokarz, S., Gasik, R. E., Solano, C. M., Smith, E. A., Sagoe, M. B., Hudson, L. V., Steele, K., Theall, K. P., & Clum, G. A. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/47151 · Cited by 7
Hidden Depths: Testimonial Injustice, Deep Disagreement, and Democratic Deliberation
McGlynn, A. (2023) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2023.2263710 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
