The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,601–3,700 of 12,257
Jacobsen, P. C., Berry, K., Clarkson, L., Hiscocks, R., Hopkins, I., Morgan, C., Tandon, D., Teale, A., Tyler, N., & Wood, L. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-06294-x · Cited by 5
Are we ready to be wrong? Extended peer community for quality science-advice in uncertainty
Kim, M. H., & Dankel, D. J. (2024) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103520 · Cited by 5
Symbolic representation in policing: How officer characteristics shape police-suspect interactions
Rhee, Y.-C., Menifield, C. E., & Song, M. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2431882 · Cited by 5
Herd Accountability of Privacy-Preserving Algorithms: A Stackelberg Game Approach
Yang, Y.-T. C., Zhang, T., & Zhu, Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3540357 · Cited by 6
Adugna, A. B. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101351 · Cited by 5
Piatkowski, T. M., Barratt, M. J., Coomber, R., Gibbs, N., Neumann, D. L., & Dunn, M. (2025) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/00914509251334958 · Cited by 5
Vulnerability is not a checklist: Grounded Normative Theory in global deliberation
Veloso, L. H. N., Curato, N., Ross, M., & Morán, A. (2025) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/14687941251341997 · Cited by 6
How Down is a Downbeat? Feeling Meter and Gravity in Music and Dance
Still, J. (2015) · Empirical Musicology Review · doi:10.18061/emr.v10i1-2.4577 · Cited by 5
Conference report: interdisciplinary workshop in the philosophy of medicine: parentalism and trust
Bullock, E. C., Gergel, T., & Kingma, E. (2015) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12365 · Cited by 5
The Virtues of Ingenuity: Reasoning and Arguing without Bias
Morin, O. (2013) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9174-y · Cited by 5
Canaries and Coalmines: Toxic Discourse in The Incredible Shrinking Woman and Safe
Hosey, S. (2011) · NWSA Journal · doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0021 · Cited by 5
Horsthemke, K. (2010) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2010.5712302 · Cited by 5
Mwita, E. J., & Murphy, S. P. (2017) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2017.1293122 · Cited by 5
Militer par le témoignage public : défis et retombées pour les communautés sexuelles et de genres
Mensah, M. N., Charlebois, J. B., Vallerand, O., Wesley, S., & Monteith, K. (2017) · Reflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · doi:10.7202/1040750ar · Cited by 9
Democratic communities of inquiry: Creating opportunities to develop citizenship
Zaphir, L. (2017) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2017.1364156 · Cited by 5
Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin
Peels, R., Eyghen, H. V., & van den Brink, G. (2018) · New approaches to the scientific study of religion · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90239-5_11 · Cited by 5
Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Bonner, A., Hall, Y., Harman, P., Johnston, L., Levi, C., Smith, K., & Taylor, R. (2018) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447340751.003.0002 · Cited by 5
Disclosure of Mental Health: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives
Puddifoot, K. (2019) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2019.0048 · Cited by 5
Social Egalitarianism and the Private Sponsorship of Refugees
Lim, D. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12294 · Cited by 5
Theorizing White Racial Domination and Racial Justice: A Reply to Christopher Lebron
Mills, C. W. (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12296 · Cited by 5
Ko, D., & Hong, J. J. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2019.1697468 · Cited by 5
Psychiatry, risk and vulnerability: The significance of Robert Castel’s work for nursing
Paradis-Gagné, É., & Pariseau‐Legault, P. (2019) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.12295 · Cited by 5
From hermeneutics to heteroglossia: ‘The Patient’s View’ revisited
Chin-Yee, B. H., Díaz, P., Bryden, P., Soklaridis, S., & Kuper, A. (2019) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2019-011724 · Cited by 5
Letter-Writing as a Decolonial Feminist Praxis for Philosophical Writing
Acevedo-Zapata, D. M. (2020) · Hypatia · doi:10.1017/hyp.2020.19 · Cited by 5
Mazzone, L. (2020) · Theoria · doi:10.3167/th.2020.6716404 · Cited by 5
Decolonising Our Minds, Decolonising Our Languages
Motinyane, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671088.005 · Cited by 5
Cultural Priming Effects and the Human Brain
Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.011 · Cited by 5
Ritual and Religion as Social Technologies of Cooperation
Kavanagh, C. M., Jong, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.016 · Cited by 8
Kirmayer, L. J., Worthman, C. M., & Kitayama, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.002 · Cited by 6
Presentation fever and podium affects
Gunaratnam, Y. (2020) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700120969348 · Cited by 5
Adversarial Listening in Argumentation
Davis, J., & Godden, D. (2020) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-020-09730-1 · Cited by 5
In defence of not-knowing: uncertainty and contemporary narratives of sexual violence
Wallace, S. (2021) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700120987387 · Cited by 8
Can the Excluded Criticize? On the (Im)possibilities of Formulating and Understanding Critique
Herzog, B. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1893858 · Cited by 5
Yang, R., Horstman, K., & Penders, B. (2021) · Food Culture & Society · doi:10.1080/15528014.2021.1884410 · Cited by 5
Empowering canaries: Sustainability, vulnerability, and the ethics of epistemology
Scheman (2014) · International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics · doi:10.2979/intjfemappbio.7.1.169 · Cited by 5
Racial Battle Fatigue, Epistemic Exploitation and Willful Ignorance
Applebaum, B. (2021) · doi:10.47925/76.4.060 · Cited by 5
The impact of a psychiatric diagnosis on the self-narrative of the recipient
Hassall, R. (2020) · History & Philosophy of Psychology · doi:10.53841/bpshpp.2020.21.1.4 · Cited by 5
Jugend, romantische Liebe und das gute Leben
Schweiger, G. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie · doi:10.1007/s42048-021-00100-z · Cited by 5
Resisting Epistemic Injustices
Schlüter, L. (2021) · Las Torres de Lucca International Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.5209/ltdl.76463 · Cited by 6
Strategies to Achieve a Rights-Based Approach through WHO QualityRights
Funk, M., Drew, N., Ansong, J., Chisholm, D., Murko, M., Nato, J., Ohene, S.-A., Vergara, J., & Zoghbi, E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.019 · Cited by 5
Testimony in African epistemology revisited
Janvid, M. (2021) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/02580136.2021.1954766 · Cited by 5
Women’s dialogic encounters: agonistic listening and emotions in multiple-identity conflicts
Göker, Z. G., & Çelik, A. B. (2021) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1977621 · Cited by 5
Vargas, M. L., Pérez, M. M., Hernández, C. M., & Fernández‐Baldor, Á. (2022) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2021.2005555 · Cited by 5
¿Es posible construir una teoría de la justicia feminista?
Gallegos, M. I. P. (2022) · Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Político · doi:10.46661/revintpensampolit.6248 · Cited by 5
Tieu, L., & Romoli, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.22 · Cited by 5
Syrett, K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.14 · Cited by 5
Bank, W. (2014) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0342-0_ch3 · Cited by 5
Bennett, N. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190060695.001.0001 · Cited by 5
Zurn, P., Zhou, D., Lydon‐Staley, D. M., & Bassett, D. S. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009026949.013 · Cited by 6
Medina, J. (2022) · Estudios de Filosofía · doi:10.17533/udea.ef.349613 · Cited by 6
Suárez‐Díaz, E. (2022) · Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte · doi:10.1002/bewi.202200024 · Cited by 5
Luzzi, F. (2022) · Journal of the Philosophy of Sport · doi:10.1080/00948705.2022.2137030 · Cited by 5
King, Z. J. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12235 · Cited by 5
Moors, A. (2022) · Implicit Religion · doi:10.1558/imre.20627 · Cited by 5
Calving Out a Space to Exist: “Marked” Identities in Polar Science’s “Unmarked Spaces”
Lawrence, A., & Escobedo, L. G. (2023) · Earth Science Systems and Society · doi:10.3389/esss.2023.10070 · Cited by 5
Kröger, C., Molewijk, A. C., & Metselaar, S. (2023) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-023-10258-3 · Cited by 5
Hook, J., & Fines, I. (2023) · Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/02668734.2023.2199821 · Cited by 5
Congdon, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197691571.001.0001 · Cited by 6
Benton, P. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49002-6_3 · Cited by 6
Allies Against Oppression: Intersectional Feminism, Critical Race Theory, and Rawlsian Liberalism
Arvan, M. (2023) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v26i2.2449 · Cited by 7
Saif, O., Staddon, S., & Keane, A. M. (2023) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14273 · Cited by 5
de Prado‐Gordillo, M. N. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04427-5 · Cited by 8
Knott, E., & Kostovicova, D. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055424000546 · Cited by 5
Tufte, T. (2024) · Critical Arts · doi:10.1080/02560046.2024.2358374 · Cited by 5
Epistemic racism in anti-doping research: A call for critical awareness
Ruwuya, J., Juma, B. O., Janarthanan, R., & Woolf, J. (2024) · Performance Enhancement & Health · doi:10.1016/j.peh.2024.100300 · Cited by 5
Hidden Virality and the Everyday Burden of Correcting WhatsApp Mis- and Disinformation
Paris, B. S., & Pasquetto, I. V. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009255165.008 · Cited by 5
Introduction: Reasoning for Change
Rooney, P., & Hundleby, C. E. (2010) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v30i3.3018 · Cited by 5
Research Note: Surveillance in contemporary health and social care: friend or foe?
Morgan, H. M. (2014) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v12i4.5189 · Cited by 5
IX-A Virtue Theory of Testimony
Faulkner, P. (2014) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00370.x · Cited by 5
Criminal Justice and Social Justice
(2006) · Fernwood Publishing eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350219403.ch-006 · Cited by 5
Under-Theorized and Under-Taught
May, V. M. (2014) · Meridians · doi:10.2979/meridians.12.2.28 · Cited by 5
An Ecology of Epistemic Authority
Code, L. B. (2011) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0004 · Cited by 5
Hobbes’ Frontispiece: Authorship, Subordination and Contract
Richardson, J. (2015) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-015-9165-9 · Cited by 5
HOW TO INSULT AND COMPLIMENT A TESTIFIER
Malcolm, F. (2016) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2016.39 · Cited by 5
van Anders, S. M., & Schudson, Z. C. (2017) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1004-7 · Cited by 5
How Not to Argue for Selective Reproductive Procedures
Kittay, E. F. (2017) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2017.0015 · Cited by 5
A Question for Feminist Epistemology
Phelan, K. M. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1360409 · Cited by 5
Refugee authors’ views of language in their creative writing
Chaplin, M. (2017) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2017.1401692 · Cited by 5
Epistemic Injustice: Towards Uncovering Knowledge of Bisexual Realities in Social Work Research
Iacono, G. (2017) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/21427 · Cited by 5
Rise of the Internet—Navigating Our Online and Place-Based Ecologies
Stokols, D. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803113-1.00004-1 · Cited by 8
Hermeneutical injustice and outsourced domestic work
Shahvisi, A. (2018) · Women s Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2018.04.002 · Cited by 5
Recognition and Feminist Thought
Bratu, C., & Lepold, K. (2018) · Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-19561-8_71-1 · Cited by 5
Refuse, Refute, Resist: Alt-Right Attacks on Engineering and STEM Education Diversity Scholarship
Riley, D. M. (2024) · Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference (CoNECD) · doi:10.18260/1-2--29572 · Cited by 5
CHILDREN AND TESTIMONIAL INJUSTICE: A RESPONSE TO BURROUGHS AND TOLLEFSEN
Bartlett, G. C. (2018) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.34 · Cited by 5
Carlson, J. (2018) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-018-9607-8 · Cited by 5
Alfano, M., Cunningham, S. W., Meulemans, W., Rutter, I., Sondag, M., Speckmann, B., & Sullivan, E. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on eScience · doi:10.1109/escience.2018.00073 · Cited by 5
Harassment and the Privilege of Unknowing
Doyle, J. (2019) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-7481330 · Cited by 5
Burgh, G., & Thornton, S. (2019) · childhood & philosophy · doi:10.12957/childphilo.2019.42794 · Cited by 5
Moral ignorance and the social nature of responsible agency
Hiller, F. R. (2019) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2019.1667871 · Cited by 5
Flowerree, A. K. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01376-z · Cited by 5
The case for epistocratic republicanism
Blunt, G. D. (2019) · Politics · doi:10.1177/0263395719889563 · Cited by 5
Interreligious Learning, Ricoeur, and the Problem of Testimonial and Hermeneutical Injustice
Moyaert, M. (2019) · Journal of Nationalism Memory & Language Politics · doi:10.2478/jnmlp-2019-0014 · Cited by 5
Luci, N., & Schwandner‐Sievers, S. (2020) · Nations and Nationalism · doi:10.1111/nana.12594 · Cited by 5
Humility and Ethical Development
Mason, C. (2020) · Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy · doi:10.26556/jesp.v17i1.732 · Cited by 5
Ostrowdun, C., Friendly, R. H., Matthews, K., de Bie, A., & Roelofs, F. (2020) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.4093 · Cited by 5
Creating Inclusive College Classroom: Granting Epistemic Credibility to Learners
Loya, K. I. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1_7 · Cited by 5
Carey, B. (2020) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12365 · Cited by 5
Drolet, M.-J., Girard, K., & Gaudet, R. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1068761ar · Cited by 5
Vectors of epistemic insecurity
Sullivan, E., & Alfano, M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315146058-11 · Cited by 5
The Cultural Brain as Historical Artifact
Boddice, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.018 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
