Cited by 201Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The neural basis of task-switching in working memory: effects of performance and aging.

Open access
Smith, Edward E., Geva, Anat, Jonides, John, Miller, Andrea, Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia, Koeppe, Robert A.·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We studied the performance of young and senior subjects on a well known working memory task, the Operation Span. This is a dual-task in which subjects perform a memory task while simultaneously verifying simple equations. Positron-emission tomography scans were taken during performance. Both young and senior subjects demonstrated a cost in accuracy and latency in the Operation Span compared with performing each component task alone (math verification or memory only). Senior subjects were disproportionately impaired relative to young subjects on the dual-task. When brain activation was examined for senior subjects, we found regions in prefrontal cortex that were active in the dual-task, but not in the component tasks. Similar results were obtained for young subjects who performed relatively poorly on the dual-task; however, for young subjects who performed relatively well in the dual-task, we found no prefrontal regions that were active only in the dual-task. Results are discussed as they relate to the executive component of task switching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.98.4.2095

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual tasking may require both WM capacity and IC mechanisms.

    “suggesting that dual tasking may require both WM capacity and IC mechanisms (Towse et al., 2000; Smith et al., 2001; Unsworth, 2010; Chein et al., 2011).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Smith et al., 2001

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3]Daneman M, Carpenter P. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 1980;19:450–466. [Google Scholar]
  2. [4]Turner M L, Engle R W. J Mem Lang. 1989;28:127–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. [6]Adcock R A, Constable R T, Gore J C, Goldman-Rakic P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:3567–3572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060588897. . (First Published March 21, 2000; 10.1073/pnas.060588897) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [7]Bunge S A, Klingberg T, Jacobsen R B, Gabrieli J D E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:3573–3578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050583797. . (First Published March 21, 2000; 10.1073/pnas.050583797) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. [12]Cohen J D, Macwhinney B, Flatt M, Provost J. Behav Res Methods Instr Comp. 1993;25:257–271. [Google Scholar]
  6. [13]LaPointe L B, Engle R W. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit. 1990;16:1118–1133. [Google Scholar]
  7. [15]Minoshima S, Koeppe R A, Fessler J A, Mintun M A, Berger K L, Taylor S F, Kuhl D E. In: Quantification of Brain Function—Tracer Kinetics and Image Analysis in Brain PET. Uemura K, Lassen T J, Kanno I, editors. International Congress Series 1030, Tokyo: Excepta Medica; 1993. pp. 409–418. [Google Scholar]
  8. [18]Worsley K J, Evans A C, Marrett S, Neelin P. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992. 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E. E., Geva, A., Jonides, J., Miller, A., Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Koeppe, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Psychology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-02-13
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
2095-2100
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2097263602
Cited by
200
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
task switching, working memory, operation span, aging, dual-task performance, prefrontal cortex, brain activation, executive function, older adults, individual differences in performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neurons, Task Performance and Analysis, Tomography, Emission-Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review