CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 240Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Quantitative Architecture Distinguishes Prefrontal Cortical Systems in the Rhesus Monkey

Dombrowski, S.M.·2001·Cerebral Cortex
DOI 10.1093/cercor/11.10.975
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex encompasses a large and heterogeneous set of areas, whose borders have been variously mapped in different architectonic studies. Differences in cortical maps present a formidable problem in comparing data across studies and in constructing databanks on the connections and functional attributes of cortical areas. Here we used quantitative approaches to cortical mapping to investigate (i) if architectonic areas of the prefrontal cortex in adult rhesus monkeys have unique profiles and (ii) if groups of architectonic areas belonging to distinct cortical types, ranging from agranular to eulaminate, have similar features. In addition, we used multidimensional analyses to see if, and how, prefrontal areas form clusters when multiple features are considered simultaneously. We used quantitative unbiased sampling procedures to estimate the areal and laminar density of neurons, glia and neurons positive for the calcium binding proteins parvalbumin (PV), calbindin (CB) and calretinin (CR) among 21 prefrontal areas or subdivisions of areas. Neuronal density varied among the prefrontal cortices (range: 38 569 +/- 4078 to 58 708 +/- 2327 neurons/mm(3)); it was lowest in caudal orbitofrontal and medial areas (OPAll, OPro, 13, 24a, 32, M25) and highest in lateral prefrontal areas (subdivisions of areas 46 and 8). Neurons positive for PV were most prevalent in lateral prefrontal areas and least prevalent in caudal orbitofrontal and medial pre-frontal areas, whereas the opposite trend was noted for neurons that expressed CB. Neurons positive for CR did not show regional differences, and the density of glia showed small variations among prefrontal cortices. The differences among areas, along with differences in the thickness of individual areas and layers, were used to establish a quantitative profile for each area. The results showed that differences in the density of neurons, and the preponderance of neurons positive for PV and CB, were related to different architectonic types of areas found within the prefrontal cortex. Conventional as well as multiparameter statistical analyses distinguished at one extreme the agranular and dysgranular (limbic) cortices, which were characterized by prominent deep layers (V-VI), the lowest neuronal density, the highest ratio of glia/neurons, and the lowest density of PV and the highest for CB. At the other extreme, lateral eulaminate cortices were characterized by the highest density of neurons, a prominent granular layer IV, denser supragranular (II-III) than infragranular (V-VI) layers, and a balanced distribution of neurons positive for PV and CB. The results provide insights into potentially different rates of development or maturation of limbic and eulaminate prefrontal areas, and their differential vulnerability in neurological and psychiatric diseases. The quantitative methods used provide an objective approach to construct maps, address differences in nomenclature across studies, establish homologies in different species and provide a baseline to identify changes in pathologic conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/11.10.975

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In nonhuman primates and humans, glial cells seem to somewhat outnumber neurons in the PFC, with regional variation likely contributing to formation of secondary and tertiary gyri.

    “In nonhuman primates and human, glial cells seem to somewhat outnumber neurons in the PFC, albeit with regional variation which is likely to contribute to the formation of secondary and tertiary gyri [77–81].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Dombrowski, S. M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Dombrowski, S.M.
ORCID
Dombrowski, S.M.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
975-988
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
DOI
10.1093/cercor/11.10.975
OpenAlex
W2120223285
Cited by
240
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS57414, NS24760)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, rhesus monkeys, neuronal density, glial density, parvalbumin, calbindin, calretinin, calcium-binding proteins, lateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cell Count, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Neuroglia, Neurons, Parvalbumins, Prefrontal Cortex, Calbindins, S100 Calcium Binding Protein G, Calbindin 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review