Cited by 174Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Neural basis of maternal communication and emotional expression processing during infant preverbal stage

Lenzi, D., Trentini, C., Pantano, P., Macaluso, E., Iacoboni, M., Lenzi, G.L., Ammaniti, M.·2009·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

During the first year of life, exchanges and communication between a mother and her infant are exclusively preverbal and are based on the mother's ability to understand her infant's needs and feelings (i.e., empathy) and on imitation of the infant's facial expressions; this promotes a social dialog that influences the development of the infant self. Sixteen mothers underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while observing and imitating faces of their own child and those of someone else's child. We found that the mirror neuron system, the insula and amygdala were more active during emotional expressions, that this circuit is engaged to a greater extent when interacting with one's own child, and that it is correlated with maternal reflective function (a measure of empathy). We also found, by comparing single emotions with each other, that joy expressions evoked a response mainly in right limbic and paralimbic areas; by contrast, ambiguous expressions elicited a response in left high order cognitive and motor areas, which might reflect cognitive effort.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhn153

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Baby joy expressions across identity evoked mostly right limbic and paralimbic areas, whereas ambiguous expressions elicited left-sided high order cognitive and motor areas.

    “They also reported that baby joy expressions across identity evoked mostly right limbic and paralimbic areas important to emotional processing, whereas ambiguous expressions elicited responses in left-sided high order cognitive and motor areas, logically reflecting associated cognitive effort.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Lenzi et al., 2008

  • Lenzi et al. (2008) found mirror neuron system including insula and amygdala more active during emotional expressions from mother's own child, and insula response correlates with maternal reflective function.

    “They found that the mirror neuron system, including insula and amygdala were more active during emotional expressions from a mother’s own child, and that insula response correlates with maternal reflective function, conceptualized as a measure of empathy.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Lenzi et al., 2008

  • Attachment style and reflective function has been formally assessed in one imaging study so far showing direct correlation with insula response to own infant face.

    “Attachment style and reflective function has only been formally assessed in one imaging study so far showing direct correlation with insula response to own infant face.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Lenzi et al. (2008)

  • The insula response correlated with the empathy-related measure of maternal reflective function (Lenzi et al., 2009).

    “Furthermore, the insula response correlated with the empathy-related measure of maternal reflective function.”
  • In mothers observing and imitating faces of their own and someone else's child, regions believed to contain mirror neurons and connected limbic regions (insula and amygdala) were more active during emotional expressions from own child (Lenzi et al., 2009).

    “In this study, regions believed to contain mirror neurons and connected limbic regions, including insula and amygdala respectively, were more active during emotional expressions from own child.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenzi, D., Trentini, C., Pantano, P., Macaluso, E., Iacoboni, M., Lenzi, G. L., & Ammaniti, M.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2008-09-11
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1124-1133
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2143036661
Cited by
174
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
maternal communication, mirror neuron system, insula, amygdala, maternal empathy, facial expression imitation, mother-infant interaction, limbic system, cognitive effort
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Empathy, Female, Humans, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Photic Stimulation, Expressed Emotion, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review