Cited by 183Coffee research and impactsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsNutritional Studies and Diet

Coffee consumption and the incidence of coronary heart disease.

Open access
LaCroix, Andrea Z., Mead, Lucy A., Liang, Kung-Yee, Thomas, Caroline Bedell, Pearson, Thomas A.·1986·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We conducted a prospective investigation of the effect of coffee consumption on coronary heart disease in 1130 male medical students who were followed for 19 to 35 years. Changes in coffee consumption and cigarette smoking during follow-up were examined in relation to the incidence of clinically evident coronary disease in comparisons of three measures of coffee intake--base-line intake, average intake, and most recent intake reported before the manifestation of coronary disease. Clinical evidence of coronary disease included myocardial infarction, angina, and sudden cardiac death. In separate analyses for each measure of coffee intake, the relative risks for men drinking five or more cups of coffee per day, as compared with nondrinkers, were approximately 2.80 for all three measures in the univariate analyses (maximum width of 95 percent confidence intervals, 1.27 to 6.51). After adjustment for age, current smoking, hypertension status, and base-line level of serum cholesterol, the estimated relative risk for men drinking five or more cups of coffee per day (using the most recent coffee intake measure), as compared with those drinking none, was 2.49 (maximum width of 95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 5.77). The association between coffee and coronary disease was strongest when the time between the reports of coffee intake and the coronary event was shortest. These findings support an independent, dose-responsive association of coffee consumption with clinically evident coronary heart disease, which is consistent with a twofold to threefold elevation in risk among heavy coffee drinkers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198610163151601

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among possible explanations for the discrepancy is that some earlier hospital based case-control studies included patients among the controls who may have reduced their intake of coffee after a diagnosis of chronic illness, for example digestive diseases.

    “Among the possible explanations for this dis- crepancy is that some earlier hospital based case-control studies included patients among the controls who may have reduced their intake of coffee after a diagnosis of chronic illness-for example, digestive diseases.'035”
  • Case-control studies that included control patients admitted for chronic conditions may have overestimated the association between coffee consumption and risk of heart disease.

    “Thus case-control studies that included control patients admitted for chronic conditions may have overestimated the association between coffee consumption and risk of heart disease.'035”
  • In cohort studies with repeated measurements of exposure assessment, the association between heart disease and coffee intake was strongest when the exposure measurement used was nearest to the outcome.

    “In cohort studies with repeated measurements of exposure assess- ment, the association between heart disease and coffee intake was strongest when the exposure measurement used was nearest to the outcome.'042”
  • In the study by LaCroix et al, the relative risk for five or more cups/day compared with none increased from 1.8 (95% CI 0.8 to 4.0) when intake was assessed 10 or more years previously, to 2.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.8) when the intake within the past five years was used.

    “In the study by LaCroix et al the relative risk for five or more cups/day compared with none increased from 1-8 (95% CI 0-8 to 4 0) when intake was assessed 10 or more years previously, to 2-5 (95% CI 1-1 to 5 8) when the intake within the past five years was used.'0”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Coffee drinking and acute myocardial infarction: report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. Lancet 1972; 2:1278-81.
  2. [22]22. Thomas CB. Observations on some possible precursors of essential hypertension and coronary artery disease. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1951; 89: 419-41.
  3. [24]24. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc Ser (A) 1972; 135:185-207.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaCroix, A. Z., Mead, L. A., Liang, K.-Y., Thomas, C. B., & Pearson, T. A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1986-10-16
Volume
315
Issue
16
Pages
977-982
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2054987034
Cited by
183
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG001760)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (5-T32 HL07024-10, T32HL007024)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
coffee consumption, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, sudden cardiac death, dose-response relationship, cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, hypertension, men, medical students
MeSH terms
Adult, Angina Pectoris, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Death, Sudden, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review