CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryDisability Education and Employment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurocognitive predictors of work outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia.

Open access
Nuechterlein, K. H., Subotnik, K. L., Green, M. F., Ventura, J., Asarnow, R. F., Gitlin, M. J., Yee, C. M., Gretchen-Doorly, D., Mintz, J.·2011·Schizophrenia Bulletin
DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbr084PMC PMC3160123
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

While the role of neurocognitive impairment in predicting functional outcome in chronic schizophrenia is now widely accepted, the results that have examined this relationship in the early phase of psychosis are surprisingly rather mixed. The predictive role of cognitive impairment early in the illness is of particular interest because interventions during this initial period may help to prevent the development of chronic disability. In a University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) longitudinal study, we assessed schizophrenia patients with a recent first episode of psychosis using a neurocognitive battery at an initial clinically stabilized outpatient point and then followed them during continuous treatment over the next 9 months. Three orthogonal cognitive factors were derived through principal components analysis: working memory, attention and early perceptual processing, and verbal memory and processing speed. All patients were provided a combination of maintenance antipsychotic medication, case management, group skills training, and family education in a UCLA research clinic. A modified version of the Social Adjustment Scale was used to assess work outcome. Multiple regression analyses indicate that the combination of the 3 neurocognitive factors predicts 52% of the variance in return to work or school by 9 months after outpatient clinical stabilization. These data strongly support the critical role of neurocognitive factors in recovery of work functioning after an onset of schizophrenia. Cognitive remediation and other interventions targeting these early cognitive deficits are of major importance to attempts to prevent chronic disability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbr084

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Addington, 2002, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 27, 188

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 297

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nuechterlein, K. H., Subotnik, K. L., Green, M. F., Ventura, J., Asarnow, R. F., Gitlin, M. J., Yee, C. M., Gretchen-Doorly, D., & Mintz, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Nuechterlein, K. H.
ORCID
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2011-08-22
Volume
37
Issue
suppl 2
Pages
S33-S40
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
DOI
10.1093/schbul/sbr084
PMC
PMC3160123
OpenAlex
W2102694811
Cited by
297
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH037705, MH-066286, MH030911, R01MH037705, P50MH066286)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
recent-onset schizophrenia, first-episode psychosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Time Factors, Work, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review