Cited by 54Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchInfluenza Virus Research StudiesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Effects of Short-term Sleep Deprivation on Murine Immunity to Influenza Virus in Young Adult and Senescent Mice

Kathryn B. Renegar, Rachael A. Floyd, James M. Krueger·1998·Sleep

Abstract

Sleep has been proposed as an innate host defense, exerting effects on both specific and nonspecific immunity. In one of the more striking papers dealing with the effects of sleep on specific immunity, Brown et al (Reg. Immunol. 1989; 2: 321-325) reported that depriving influenza virus-immune mice of sleep for 7 hours following total respiratory tract viral challenge abrogated anti-viral immunity within the lungs and lowered the level of anti-influenza antibody in lung homogenates. In the solidly-immune convalescent mouse, nasobronchial immunity to influenza virus has been shown to be due to secretory IgA (S-IgA) within the mucosal mucocilliary blanket, while serum IgG has been shown to mediate protection within the lung parenchyma. In this study we attempted to duplicate the work of Brown et al in solidly immune mice. We were unable to abrogate mucosal anti-influenza viral immunity with a single post-viral-challenge sleep-deprivation episode, nor were we able to depress this immunity with one pre- and two post-challenge sleep-deprivation episodes in young adult or old mice, or with two pre-challenge sleep-deprivation episodes in old mice. Sleep deprivation did not depress the level of serum influenza-specific IgG antibodies, and resulted in increased influenza-specific serum IgG compared with normally sleeping mice in aged immune mice boosted 3 weeks before challenge and sleep deprived once before and twice after challenge (p = 0.005). No differences in anti-viral respirator…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/21.3.241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, animal studies revealed inconsistent results with sleep, compared with conditions of sleep deprivation, enhancing or weakening markers of recall, or showing no effect.

    “Overall, these studies revealed inconsistent results with sleep, compared with conditions of sleep deprivation, enhancing or weakening markers of recall, or showing no effect (145, 980, 981, 1206).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [981]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renegar, K. B., Floyd, R. A., & Krueger, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rachael A. Floyd
Venue
Sleep
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
241-8
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W38148246
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-31453, NS-25378, R01NS031453, R01NS025378)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-36520, R01HD036520)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep deprivation, influenza virus, mucosal immunity, secretory IgA, serum IgG, humoral immunity, aging, lung immunity, innate host defense, antiviral antibodies
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Antibody Formation, Female, Immunoglobulin G, Orthomyxoviridae, Sleep Deprivation, Time Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review