Cited by 281Identity, Memory, and TherapyMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neural substrates of the self‐memory system: New insights from a meta‐analysis

Open access
Martinelli, Pénélope, Sperduti, Marco, Piolino, Pascale·2013·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

The self has been the topic of philosophical inquiry for centuries. Neuropsychological data suggest that the declarative self can be fractionated into three functionally independent systems processing personal information at several levels of abstraction, including episodic memories of one's own life (episodic autobiographical memory, EAM), semantic knowledge of facts about one's own life (semantic autobiographical memory, SAM), and semantic summary representations of one's personal identity (conceptual self, CS). Our proposal here was to present a comprehensive description of the neural networks underpinning self‐representations. To this aim, we performed three meta‐analyses, one each for EAM, SAM, and CS, using the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method. We expected a shift from posterior to anterior structures associated with the incrementally increasing level of abstraction of self‐representations. The key finding was that EAM predominantly activates posterior and limbic regions including hippocampus. SAM is associated with anterior activations and also posterior and limbic activations in a lesser degree than EAM. CS mainly recruits medial prefrontal structures. Interestingly, medial prefrontal cortex is activated irrespective of the level of abstraction, but a more caudal part is recruited during CS, while SAM and EAM activate more rostral portions. To conclude, in line with the previous proposals, our results corroborate the idea that the declarative self is not monolithic but a multidimensional construct comprising distinct representations at different levels of abstraction. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22008

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Episodic memory, relative to semantic memory, declines rapidly and dramatically with normal ageing.

    “Similarly, episodic memory, relative to semantic memory, declines rapidly and dramatically with normal ageing [10–15].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

  • In humans, episodic memory declines with normal ageing and deteriorates earliest and most dramatically compared to other forms of memory.

    “In humans, episodic memory is well known to decline with normal ageing [10,11] and deteriorates the earliest and most dramaticlly compared to other forms of memory [12–15].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Duval C, What happens to personal identity when semantic knowledge degrades: Insights from semantic dementia, Neuropsychologia
  2. Fitts WH, 1996, Tennessee Self‐Concept Scale: 2 Manual
  3. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1084 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinelli, P., Sperduti, M., & Piolino, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Paris Descartes (FR)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-22
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1515-1529
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2053763916
Cited by
281
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
self-memory, self-representation, episodic autobiographical memory, personal identity, neural correlates, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, limbic system, levels of abstraction, activation likelihood estimation
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Ego, Humans, Memory, Likelihood Functions, PubMed, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review