Cited by 525Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Different Training Procedures Recruit Either One or Two Critical Periods for Contextual Memory Consolidation, Each of Which Requires Protein Synthesis and PKA

Open access
Bourtchouladze, Roussoudan, Abel, Ted, Berman, Nathaniel, Gordon, Rachael, Lapidus, Kyle, Kandel, Eric R.·1998·Learning & Memory

Abstract

We have used a combined genetic and pharmacological approach to define the time course of the requirement for protein kinase A (PKA) and protein synthesis in long-term memory for contextual fear conditioning in mice. The time course of amnesia in transgenic mice that express R(AB) and have genetically reduced PKA activity in the hippocampus parallels that observed both in mice treated with inhibitors of PKA and mice treated with inhibitors of protein synthesis. This PKA- and protein synthesis-dependent memory develops between 1 hr and 3 hr after training. By injecting the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin or the PKA inhibitor Rp-cAMPs at various times after training, we find that depending on the nature of training, contextual memory has either one or two brief consolidation periods requiring synthesis of new proteins, and each of these also requires PKA. Weak training shows two time periods of sensitivity to inhibitors of protein synthesis and PKA, whereas stronger training exhibits only one. These studies underscore the parallel dependence of long-term contextual memory on protein synthesis and PKA and suggest that different training protocols may recruit a common signaling pathway in distinct ways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.5.4.365

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • cAMP-PKA-dependent memory formation for contextual fear conditioning is selectively sensitive to inhibition of PKA and protein synthesis within specific time windows after training (immediately or 4 h).

    “Also, cAMP-PKA-dependent memory formation for contextual fear conditioning is selectively sensitive to the inhibition of PKA and protein synthesis when this inhibition occurs within specific time windows after training, i.e., immediately or 4 h after training (128).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [128]

    The section “A Weak Training Protocol Reveals Two Sensitive Periods” reports that, after a single CS/US pairing, inhibition of either protein synthesis or PKA impaired contextual memory when given immediately or 4 hours after training. The claim omits the training-strength qualification: the paper reports only an immediate sensitive period after stronger training, with no significant effect at 4 hours. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bernabeu, R., L. Bevilaqua, P. Ardenghi., E. Bromberg, P. Schmitz, M. Bianchin, I. Izquierdo, and J. Medina. 1997. Involvement of hippocampal cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways in a late memory consolidation phase of aversively motivated learning in rats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 7041-7046.
  2. Davis, H.P. and L.R. Squire. 1984. Protein synthesis and memory: A review. Psychol. Bull. 96: 518-559.
  3. Franklin, K.B. and G. Paxinos. 1997. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bourtchouladze, R., Abel, T., Berman, N., Gordon, R., Lapidus, K., & Kandel, E. R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
365-374
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W1949317008
Cited by
525
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
contextual fear conditioning, memory consolidation, protein synthesis, protein kinase A, anisomycin, Rp-cAMPS, hippocampus, training protocols, long-term memory
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Cyclic AMP, Amnesia, Animals, Anisomycin, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Electroshock, Enzyme Inhibitors, Hippocampus, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Protein Synthesis Inhibitors, Thionucleotides, Time Factors, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review