Cited by 246Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

BDNF activates mTOR to regulate GluR1 expression required for memory formation

Open access
Slipczuk, Leandro, Bekinschtein, Pedro, Katche, Cynthia, Cammarota, Martín, Izquierdo, Iván, Medina, Jorge H.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) kinase plays a key role in translational control of a subset of mRNAs through regulation of its initiation step. In neurons, mTOR is present at the synaptic region, where it modulates the activity-dependent expression of locally-translated proteins independently of mRNA synthesis. Indeed, mTOR is necessary for different forms of synaptic plasticity and long-term memory (LTM) formation. However, little is known about the time course of mTOR activation and the extracellular signals governing this process or the identity of the proteins whose translation is regulated by this kinase, during mnemonic processing. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we show that consolidation of inhibitory avoidance (IA) LTM entails mTOR activation in the dorsal hippocampus at the moment of and 3 h after training and is associated with a rapid and rapamycin-sensitive increase in AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit expression, which was also blocked by intra-hippocampal delivery of GluR1 antisense oligonucleotides (ASO). In addition, we found that pre- or post-training administration of function-blocking anti-BDNF antibodies into dorsal CA1 hampered IA LTM retention, abolished the learning-induced biphasic activation of mTOR and its readout, p70S6K and blocked GluR1 expression, indicating that BDNF is an upstream factor controlling mTOR signaling during fear-memory consolidation. Interestingly, BDNF ASO hindered LTM retention only when given into dorsal CA1 1 h after but not 2 h before training, suggesting that BDNF controls the biphasic requirement of mTOR during LTM consolidation through different mechanisms: an early one involving BDNF already available at the moment of training, and a late one, happening around 3 h post-training that needs de novo synthesis of this neurotrophin. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: IN CONCLUSION, OUR FINDINGS DEMONSTRATE THAT: 1) mTOR-mediated mRNA translation is required for memory consolidation during at least two restricted time windows; 2) this kinase acts downstream BDNF in the hippocampus and; 3) it controls the increase of synaptic GluR1 necessary for memory consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0006007

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BDNF is a potent activator of mTOR signaling.

    “Previous work has shown that BDNF is a potent activator of mTOR signaling (Jourdi et al., 2009; Takei et al., 2004; Slipczuk et al., 2009), and mTOR is a key integrator for many signaling pathways (see Costa-Mattioli and Monteggia, 2013).”

    From BDNF - a key transducer of antidepressant effects (2016) · cites this paper as Slipczuk et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slipczuk, L., Bekinschtein, P., Katche, C., Cammarota, M., Izquierdo, I., & Medina, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Medina, Jorge H.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-06-23
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
e6007
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035139662
Cited by
246
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 29
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, mTOR signaling, GluR1, AMPA receptors, long-term memory consolidation, passive avoidance, fear memory, hippocampus, CA1, p70S6K, antisense oligonucleotides
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Models, Biological, Neuronal Plasticity, Protein Kinases, RNA, Messenger, Synapses, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, AMPA, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Rats, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review