Cited by 39Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringPain Management and TreatmentMuscle activation and electromyography studies

A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to treat phantom limb pain — Towards human clinical trials

Boretius, T., Yoshida, K., Badia, J., Harreby, K., Kundu, A., Navarro, X., Jensen, W., Stieglitz, T.·2012·2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)

Abstract

Over the last three years, a novel type of intrafascicular electrode was developed to serve as a corrective neural prosthetic interface to be placed in the peripheral nerve stumps of upper limb amputees who suffer from phantom limb pain (PLP). In general, the presented interface is an advancement of the thin-film LIFE electrode that was successfully used in amputees a couple of years ago. Although the LIFE concept proved to be effective, the longitudinal orientation of the implant prevented distribution of spatial selective sites in more than one fascicle. Therefore, a transversal approach was developed. The work presented was developed within the European project “TIME” and will be implanted in the median and ulnar nerves of an amputee subject in Rome later this year (2012). The present paper will outline the design, assembly technologies and full electrochemical characterization of the TIME-3H electrode for sub-chronic (<;30 days) human implants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/biorob.2012.6290787

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intra-neural devices such as LIFE, TIME, and USEA balance the trade-off between selectivity and invasiveness.

    “The trade-off between selectivity and invasiveness is more balanced with intra-neural devices such as longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes (LIFE), which are implanted parallel to nerves [25], as well as transverse intra-fascicular multi-channel electrodes (TIME) and Utah slanted electrode arrays (USEA), which penetrate nerves at varying depths [26], [27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boretius, T., Yoshida, K., Badia, J., Harreby, K., Kundu, A., Navarro, X., Jensen, W., & Stieglitz, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Purdue University in Indianapolis (US)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-06
Pages
282-287
ISSN
2155-1774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975092334
Cited by
39
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
phantom limb pain, intrafascicular electrodes, upper limb amputation, median nerve, ulnar nerve, thin film electrodes, electrochemical characterization, neuroprosthetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review