Cited by 26Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Long-term functionality of transversal intraneural electrodes is improved by dexamethasone treatment

Open access
de la Oliva, N., del Valle, J., Delgado-Martinez, I., Mueller, M., Stieglitz, T., Navarro, Xavier·2019·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Neuroprostheses aimed to restore lost functions after a limb amputation are based on the interaction with the nervous system by means of neural interfaces. Among the different designs, intraneural electrodes implanted in peripheral nerves represent a good strategy to stimulate nerve fibers to send sensory feedback and to record nerve signals to control the prosthetic limb. However, intraneural electrodes, as any device implanted in the body, induce a foreign body reaction (FBR) that results in the tissue encapsulation of the device. The FBR causes a progressive decline of the electrode functionality over time due to the physical separation between the electrode active sites and the axons to interface. Modulation of the inflammatory response has arisen as a good strategy to reduce the FBR and maintain electrode functionality. In this study transversal intraneural multi-channel electrodes (TIMEs) were implanted in the rat sciatic nerve and tested for 3 months to evaluate stimulation and recording capabilities under chronic administration of dexamethasone. Dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced the threshold for evoking muscle responses during the follow-up compared to saline-treated animals, without affecting the selectivity of stimulation. However, dexamethasone treatment did not improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded neural signals. Dexamethasone treatment allowed to maintain more working active sites along time than saline treatment. Thus, systemic administration of dexamethasone appears as a useful treatment in chronically implanted animals with neural electrodes as it increases the number of functioning contacts of the implanted TIME and reduces the intensity needed to stimulate the nerve.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2019.2897256

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dexamethasone administered systemically has been shown to improve electrical stimulation properties using TIME implants over a 3-month implantation period.

    “Dexamethasone administered systemically has also been shown to improve the electrical stimulation properties using TIME implants over a 3-month implantation period (Oliva et al., 2019).”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Oliva et al., 2019

    The Results report improved stimulation measures with dexamethasone-treated TIME implants, but state that electrophysiological comparisons were possible only through one month because some wiring systems were damaged. Animals were followed for three months, but the Conclusion limits the demonstrated stimulation benefit to the first month of implantation. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. International Organization for Standardization, Biological evaluation of medical devices, vol. 3. 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de la Oliva, N., del Valle, J., Delgado-Martinez, I., Mueller, M., Stieglitz, T., & Navarro, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2019-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
457-464
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2911370961
Cited by
26
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • FP7 Information and Communication Technologies (FP7-611687, EPIONE (FP7-602547))
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 Graphene Flagship Core Project 2 (785219)
  • H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies
  • TERCEL (RD12/0019/0011)
  • CIBERNED (CB06/05/1105)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • Fundación Ramón Areces (CIVP18A3897)
  • ICN2
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (SEV-2013-0295)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
dexamethasone, foreign body reaction, peripheral nerve stimulation, neural recording, sciatic nerve, chronic implantation, neural prostheses, amputation, anti-inflammatory therapy, signal-to-noise ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review