Cited by 82Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

A three-dimensional self-opening intraneural peripheral interface (SELINE)

Open access
Cutrone, A, Valle, J Del, Santos, D, Badia, J, Filippeschi, C, Micera, S, Navarro, X, Bossi, S·2015·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study we present the development and testing in a rat model of the self-opening neural interface (SELINE), a novel flexible peripheral neural interface. APPROACH: This polyimide-based electrode has a three-dimensional structure that provides an anchorage system to the nerve and confers stability after implant. This geometry has been achieved by means of the plastic deformation of polyimide. Mechanical and electrochemical characterizations have been performed to prove the integrity of the electrode with very good results. Functionality of SELINEs for fascicular stimulation has been tested during in vivo acute experiments in the rat. Chronic implants were made to test the biocompatibility of the device. MAIN RESULTS: Results showed that SELINEs significantly improve mechanical anchorage to the nerve. Stimulation stability is considerably enhanced compared to common planar transversal electrodes and stimulation selectivity is increased for some motor fascicles. Chronic experimental results showed that SELINEs neither produce changes in the fascicular organization of sciatic nerves nor signs of nerve degeneration. SIGNIFICANCE: The presented three-dimensional electrode provides an effective anchorage system to the nervous tissue that can improve the stability of the implant for acute and chronic studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016016

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implantation of SELINE in a rat sciatic nerve showed good selectivity and enhanced stability, despite an encapsulating layer caused by fibrotic scarring.

    “Implantation in a rat sciatic nerve showed good selectivity and enhanced stability, despite an encapsulating layer caused by fibrotic scarring of tissue [29].”

    From Active Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [29]

    The paper reports SELINE implantation in rat sciatic nerves (§2.3.3) and improved stimulation selectivity and stability in in-vivo tests (Abstract; §4, Discussion and conclusions). The Discussion describes fibrous encapsulation as a tissue reaction to implants, but does not report observing an encapsulating layer around these SELINE implants or show that the measured selectivity and stability persisted despite one. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a rat study comparing stability and stimulation selectivity of SELINE and TIME, SELINE stimulated more neural subfascicles, and its stability indices were higher than those of TIME, validating the impact of open wings in preventing displacement.

    “In a rat study comparing the stability and stimulation selectivity of the SELINE and TIME, SELINE was found to stimulate more neural subfascicles, and its stability indices were higher than the stability indices of TIME, validating the impact of open wings in preventing displacement [105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jensen W, Yoshida K and Hofmann U G 2007 3rd Int. IEEE/EMBS Conf. on Neural Eng. (Kohala Coast, Hawaii) pp 1-4
  2. 222ra19 Rossini P M et al 2010 Clin. Neurophysiol. 121 777-83 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yoshida K, Pellinen D, Pivin D, Rousche P and Kipke D 2000 Proc. 5th Annual Conf. IFESS pp 279-84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cutrone, A., Valle, J. D., Santos, D., Badia, J., Filippeschi, C., Micera, S., Navarro, X., & Bossi, S.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT)
Corresponding author
Bossi, S
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2015-01-21
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
016016
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2028925130
Cited by
82
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ENEA Open Archive (National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (280778)
  • FP7 Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
peripheral nerve interfaces, three-dimensional electrodes, polyimide electrodes, sciatic nerve, chronic implantation, biocompatibility, stimulation selectivity, rat model
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Gold, Materials Testing, Resins, Synthetic, Sciatic Nerve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Reproducibility of Results, Electric Impedance, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Elastic Modulus, Neurophysiological Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review