CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 361Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MOBILE PHONE ADDICTION: A POINT OF ISSUE

Open access
CHÓLIZ, MARIANO·2010·Addiction
DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A scientific debate is currently taking place about the new DSM-V classification regarding the diagnostic entity of pathological gambling [1,2] or compulsive internet usage [3,4] as addictive behaviours. With regard to technological addictions [5,6], the mobile phone has many attributes and characteristics that make it very attractive and foment its use, particularly in adolescence. In particular, the possession and use of the mobile phone by teenagers favours personal autonomy [7]; provides identity and prestige in comparison with their peers [8]; offers major technological innovations (tools for which adolescents demonstrate a special inclination and skill); is a source of fun and entertainment; and favours the establishment and maintenance of interpersonal relationships [9,10] by taking advantage of technological resources, such as 'missed calls'[11], that have a clear social and affective function. Teenagers are fascinated by the mobile phone. Nevertheless, the uncontrolled, inappropriate or excessive use of the mobile phone can give rise to social, behavioural and affective problems. One of the latest studies carried out on the pattern of mobile phone use in adolescents [12] revealed the existence of significant relationships between some of the main parameters of mobile use and problems derived from its abuse, as well as the presence of indicators of mobile phone dependence, according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria. Some of the most characteristic symptoms of dependence were the following: (a) excessive use, manifested in both a high economic cost and in numerous calls and messages; (b) problems with parents associated with excessive use; (c) interference with other school or personal activities; (d) a gradual increase in mobile phone use to obtain the same level of satisfaction, as well as the need to substitute operative devices with the new models that appear on the market; and (e) the need to use the mobile phone frequently, as well as emotional alterations when phone use is impeded. Diagnostic tools of mobile phone dependence have been developed [13,14]. The Test of Mobile Phone Dependence [13] was developed using the DSM-IV-TR criteria on dependence and a sample of 1944 adolescents. It contains three factors: I, 'Abstinence'; II, 'Lack of control and problems derived from the use'; and III, 'Tolerance and interference with other activities'. The results show that there is a direct and statistically significant relationship between test scores and the main parameters of dependence: lack of impulse control, use of the mobile phone to avoid unpleasant mood states, problems derived from the use of the mobile phone, abuse of the mobile phone (as shown by the number of daily calls, messages, 'missed' calls or 'beeps') and the amount of time invested daily in both calls and messages. So, even though it is necessary to carry out further work in order to analyse the associations of the scale with mental health conditions (e.g. depression, anxiety) and other indicators of psychosocial dysfunctions, the construct of 'mobile phone addiction' is really plausible and merits inclusion in DSM-V as a kind of technological addiction. None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chóliz M., 2009, Ellos, ellas y su móvil: uso, abuso (¿y dependencia?) del teléfono móvil en la adolescencia [Girls, boys and their mobile: use, abuse (and dependence) of the mobile phone in adolescence, Rev Esp Drogodep, 34, 74

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
CHÓLIZ, M.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
373-374
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
DOI
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.x
OpenAlex
W2163422710
Cited by
361
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
30.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
mobile phone addiction, mobile phone dependence, DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, compulsive internet use, gambling addiction, impulse control, problematic mobile phone use, parental problems, interpersonal relationships, missed calls, technology addiction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Psychology, Behavior, Addictive, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review