Cited by 260Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Affective Flexibility: Evaluative Processing Goals Shape Amygdala Activity

Cunningham, William A., Van Bavel, Jay J., Johnsen, Ingrid R.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

Although early research implicated the amygdala in automatic processing of negative information, more recent research suggests that it plays a more general role in processing the motivational relevance of various stimuli, suggesting that the relation between valence and amygdala activation may depend on contextual goals. This study provides experimental evidence that the relation between valence and amygdala activity is dynamically modulated by evaluative goals. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants evaluated the positive, negative, or overall (positive plus negative) aspects of famous people. When participants were providing overall evaluations, both positive and negative names were associated with amygdala activation. When they were evaluating positivity, positive names were associated with amygdala activity, and when they were evaluating negativity, negative names were associated with amygdala activity. Evidence for a negativity bias was found; modulation was more pronounced for positive than for negative information. These data suggest that the amygdala flexibly processes motivationally relevant evaluative information in accordance with current processing goals, but processes negative information less flexibly than positive information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02061.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunningham, W. A., Van Bavel, J. J., & Johnsen, I. R.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University
Corresponding author
Cunningham, William A.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
152-160
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2131439590
Cited by
260
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 30
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
amygdala, affective flexibility, valence, negativity bias, motivational relevance, emotional processing, processing goals
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Amygdala, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review