Cited by 279Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFace Recognition and Perception

Visual orienting in the early broader autism phenotype: disengagement and facilitation

Open access

Abstract

Background: Recent studies of infant siblings of children diagnosed with autism have allowed for a prospective approach to examine the emergence of symptoms and revealed behavioral differences in the broader autism phenotype within the early years. In the current study we focused on a set of functions associated with visual attention, previously reported to be atypical in autism. Method: We compared performance of a group of 9–10‐month‐old infant siblings of children with autism to a control group with no family history of autism on the ‘gap‐overlap task’, which measures the cost of disengaging from a central stimulus in order to fixate a peripheral one. Two measures were derived on the basis of infants’ saccadic reaction times. The first is the Disengagement effect, which measures the efficiency of disengaging from a central stimulus to orient to a peripheral one. The second was a Facilitation effect, which arises when the infant is cued by a temporal gap preceding the onset of the peripheral stimulus, and would orient faster after its onset. Results and conclusion: Infant siblings of children with autism showed longer Disengagement latencies as well as less Facilitation relative to the control group. The findings are discussed in relation to how differences in visual attention may relate to characteristics observed in autism and the broader phenotype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02051.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atypical attentional function has been observed in infants at risk for ASD because they have an older sibling with ASD.

    “Importantly, atypical attentional function has been shown in infants at-risk for ASD (at-risk due to having an older sibling diagnosed with ASD) (Elsabbagh et al., 2009; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005), and may be one of the earliest characteristics that distinguish infants who later receive an ASD diagnosis (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005).”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Elsabbagh et al., 2009

  • Impaired disengagement has been demonstrated in low-functioning adults with ASD and at-risk infants.

    “Impaired disengagement has also been demonstrated in low-functioning adults with ASD (Kawakubo et al., 2007) and at-risk infants (Elsabbagh et al., 2009; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005).”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Elsabbagh et al., 2009

  • Impaired disengagement is the earliest attentional deficit reported in infants at risk for ASD.

    “Because impaired disengagement is the earliest attentional deficit reported in infants at-risk for ASD (Elsabbagh et al., 2009; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2005)”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Elsabbagh et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elsabbagh, M., Volein, A., Holmboe, K., Tucker, L., Csibra, G., Baron‐Cohen, S., Bolton, P., Charman, T., Baird, G., & Johnson, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Elsabbagh, Mayada
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-21
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
637-642
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2168465204
Cited by
279
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Autism Speaks (AS1584, AS1292)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
broader autism phenotype, visual orienting, visual attention, attentional disengagement, saccade latency, autism risk
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Siblings, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review