Cited by 242Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Drug addiction as a disorder of associative learning. Role of nucleus accumbens shell/extended amygdala dopamine

DI CHIARA, G., TANDA, G., BASSAREO, V., PONTIERI, F., ACQUAS, E., FENU, S., CADONI, C., CARBONI, E.·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Conventional reinforcers phasically stimulate dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens shell. This property undergoes one-trial habituation consistent with a role of nucleus accumbens shell dopamine in associative learning. Experimental studies with place- and taste-conditioning paradigms confirm this role. Addictive drugs share with conventional reinforcers the property of stimulating dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens shell. This response, however, undergoes one-trial habituation in the case of conventional reinforcers but not of drugs. Resistance to habituation allows drugs to repetitively activate dopamine transmission in the shell upon repeated self-administration. This process abnormally facilitates associative learning, leading to the attribution of excessive motivational value to discrete stimuli or contexts predictive of drug availability. Addiction is therefore the expression of the excessive control over behavior acquired by drug-related stimuli as a result of abnormal strenghtening of stimulus-drug contingencies by nondecremental drug-induced stimulation of dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens shell.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09283.x

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DI CHIARA, G., TANDA, G., BASSAREO, V., PONTIERI, F., ACQUAS, E., FENU, S., CADONI, C., & CARBONI, E.
Affiliations
University of Cagliari (IT)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
877
Issue
1
Pages
461-485
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1966864307
Cited by
242
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
drug addiction, nucleus accumbens shell, extended amygdala, dopamine, associative learning, place conditioning, taste conditioning, self-administration, motivational value
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Association Learning, Caudate Nucleus, Conditioning, Psychological, Dopamine, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nucleus Accumbens, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review