CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,624Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbusePersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Swannell, Sarah V., Martin, Graham E., Page, Andrew, Hasking, Penelope, St John, Nathan J.·2014·Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
DOI 10.1111/sltb.12070
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Published prevalence estimates of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) among nonclinical samples are highly heterogeneous, raising concerns about their reliability and hindering attempts to explore the alleged increase in NSSI over time. Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of methodological factors on heterogeneity in NSSI prevalence estimates, explore changes over time, and estimate overall international NSSI prevalence. Results showed that methodological factors contributed over half (51.6%) of the heterogeneity in prevalence estimates, and, after adjusting for these factors, NSSI prevalence did not increase over time. Overall, pooled NSSI prevalence was 17.2% among adolescents, 13.4% among young adults, and 5.5% among adults. Clearly, development of standardized methodology in NSSI research is crucial if accurate estimates are desired.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sltb.12070

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Isaacs K.(2010).Gender differences in the prevalence rates of self‐injury among individuals who suppress thoughts. MA thesis Marshall University Huntington.
  2. StataCorp., 2009, Stata statistical software (version 11)
  3. Wood L.‐M.(2006).Self‐injurious behavior: Gender and self‐mutilation in adolescents. Masters in Forensics thesis Touro College New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,624

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Swannell, S. V., Martin, G. E., Page, A., Hasking, P., & St John, N. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • School of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Qld Australia
Corresponding author
Swannell, Sarah V.
ORCID
Venue
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
273-303
ISSN
  • 0363-0234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-278X
DOI
10.1111/sltb.12070
OpenAlex
W2063358626
Cited by
1,624
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 134 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 224 · 2022: 178 · 2021: 183 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 10
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, prevalence, non-clinical sample, methodological heterogeneity, temporal trends, adolescents, young adults, adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, United States, Global Health, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review