Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RsaL-driven negative regulation promotes heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing

Mellini, Marta, Letizia, Morgana, Caruso, Lorenzo, Guiducci, Alessandra, Meneghini, Carlo, Heeb, Stephan, Williams, Paul, Cámara, Miguel, Visca, Paolo, Imperi, Francesco, Leoni, Livia, Rampioni, Giordano·2023·mBio

Abstract

In its canonical interpretation, quorum sensing (QS) allows single cells in a bacterial population to synchronize gene expression and hence perform specific tasks collectively once the quorum cell density is reached. However, growing evidence in different bacterial species indicates that considerable cell-to-cell variation in the QS activation state occurs during growth, often resulting in coexisting subpopulations of cells in which QS is active (quorate cells) or inactive (non-quorate cells). Heterogeneity has been observed in the las QS system of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa . However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not yet been defined. The las QS system consists of an incoherent feedforward loop in which the LasR transcriptional regulator activates the expression of the lasI synthase gene and rsaL , coding for the lasI transcriptional repressor RsaL. Here, single-cell-level gene expression analyses performed in ad hoc engineered biosensor strains and deletion mutants revealed that direct binding of RsaL to the lasI promoter region increases heterogeneous activation of the las QS system. Experiments performed with a dual-fluorescence reporter system showed that the LasR-dependent expression of lasI and rsaL does not correlate in single cells, indicating that RsaL acts as a brake that stochastically limits the transition of non-quorate cells to the quorate state in a subpopulation of cells expressing high levels of this negative regulator. Interestingly, the rhl QS system that is not controlled by an analogous RsaL protein showed higher homogeneity with respect to the las system. IMPORTANCE: Single-cell analyses can reveal that despite experiencing identical physico-chemical conditions, individual bacterial cells within a monoclonal population may exhibit variations in gene expression. Such phenotypic heterogeneity has been described for several aspects of bacterial physiology, including QS activation. This study demonstrates that the transition of non-quorate cells to the quorate state is a graded process that does not occur at a specific cell density and that subpopulations of non-quorate cells also persist at high cell density. Here, we provide a mechanistic explanation for this phenomenon, showing that a negative feedback regulatory loop integrated into the las system has a pivotal role in promoting cell-to-cell variation in the QS activation state and in limiting the transition of non-quorate cells to the quorate state in P. aeruginosa .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.02039-23

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1098/rstb.2007.2039 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06768.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015473 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/AEM.02891-10 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ismej.2013.107 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/mmi.12079 · DOI
  9. 10.1128/AEM.01689-14 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/mmi.12575 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ncomms6945 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.01.021 · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.01.021
  13. 10.15252/embr.202152972 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.10.052 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1471-2180-12-209 · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-209
  16. 10.1128/JB.02544-14 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s13238-014-0100-x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.04.005
  19. 10.1128/mbio.00745-22 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1126/science.1070919 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/ng869 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/nrmicro1381 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1128/AEM.01688-07 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1316283111 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00314-9 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.03.009 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.1242782 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1093/emboj/cdg366 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1128/JB.185.7.2066-2079.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1128/JB.185.7.2080-2095.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1128/JB.181.7.2175-2184.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0407229101 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1128/JB.188.2.815-819.2006 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06029.x · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.2133841100 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1039/c7mb00040e · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/nar/gkq869 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1128/spectrum.00961-22 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1128/mBio.01079-17 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.2201242119 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1128/jb.164.2.918-921.1985 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01558.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/nar/gkw954 · DOI
  45. 10.1128/JB.01552-06 · doi:10.1128/jb.01552-06
  46. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.00063.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01817.x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.036 · DOI
  49. 10.1128/AEM.00900-15 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.tim.2021.09.001 · DOI
  51. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02654 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02654
  52. 10.1073/pnas.0908511107 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07622.x · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.051624298 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1128/JB.184.10.2576-2586.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1128/JB.00043-07 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1099/mic.0.022764-0 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1128/mBio.01513-16 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1128/mSystems.00194-20 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07890.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07890.x
  61. 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7713 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02214.x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02316.x · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02316.x
  64. 10.1111/febs.12868 · doi:10.1111/febs.12868
  65. 10.1128/JB.00635-20 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.gde.2011.09.011 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/nrmicro3491 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90138-9 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1093/nar/gks1039 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1038/nature06279 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1038/srep33101 · DOI
  73. 10.1073/pnas.1118131109 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1073/pnas.0602138103 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1111/1462-2920.15745 · DOI
  77. 10.1099/mic.0.001265 · DOI
  78. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
  79. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13982.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb13982.x
  80. 10.1007/BF00332248 · doi:10.1007/bf00332248
  81. 10.1128/AEM.02956-20 · DOI
  82. 10.1006/plas.1999.1441 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13910.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13910.x · Paper page
  84. 10.1128/JB.00345-17 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1128/jb.176.4.1128-1140.1994 · DOI
  86. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/018804-0 · DOI
  87. 10.5555/2567709.2567736 · doi:10.5555/2567709.2567736
  88. MacQueen JB. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, p 281–297. In Le Cam LM, J Neyman (ed), Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, CA, USA.
  89. 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Mellini, M., Letizia, M., Caruso, L., Guiducci, A., Meneghini, C., Heeb, S., Williams, P., Cámara, M., Visca, P., Imperi, F., Leoni, L., & Rampioni, G.
Venue
mBio
Published
2023-12-19
Volume
14
Issue
6
ISSN
2150-7511
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (20177J5Y3P, 20208LLXEJ, 202089LLEH, 20224BYR59, 2022C5PNXB)
  • Regione Lazio (A0375E0026)
  • Rome technopole (M4-C2-Inv. 1.5 CUP F83B22000040006)
  • UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F014392/1)
  • National biofilm innovation centre (BB/R012415/1 and BB/X002950/1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RsaL-driven negative regulation promotes heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/mbio.02039-23
The paper
Mellini, M., Letizia, M., Caruso, L., Guiducci, A., Meneghini, C., Heeb, S., Williams, P., Cámara, M., Visca, P., Imperi, F., Leoni, L., & Rampioni, G. (2023). RsaL-driven negative regulation promotes heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. mBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02039-23

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.