Cited by 250Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Researchstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Shunting Inhibition Does Not Have a Divisive Effect on Firing Rates

Holt, Gary R., Koch, Christof·1997·Neural Computation

Abstract

Shunting inhibition, a conductance increase with a reversal potential close to the resting potential of the cell, has been shown to have a divisive effect on subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitudes. It has therefore been assumed to have the same divisive effect on firing rates. We show that shunting inhibition actually has a subtractive effecton the firing rate in most circumstances. Averaged over several interspike intervals, the spiking mechanism effectively clamps the somatic membrane potential to a value significantly above the resting potential, so that the current through the shunting conductance is approximately independent of the firing rate. This leads to a subtractive rather than a divisive effect. In addition, at distal synapses, shunting inhibition will also have an approximately subtractive effect if the excitatory conductance is not small compared to the inhibitory conductance. Therefore regulating a cell's passive membrane conductance—for instance, via massive feedback—is not an adequate mechanism for normalizing or scaling its output.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1997.9.5.1001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike synaptically driven Vm fluctuations, changes in membrane conductance and depolarization cause lateral, or additive, shifts in the I/O transfer function of a neuron without changes in neuronal gain.

    “Unlike synaptically driven Vm fluctuations, changes in membrane conductance and depolarization cause lateral, or additive, shifts in the I/O transfer function of a neuron without changes in neuronal gain57,58,60,61,83,84.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

  • Temporally coincident changes in conductance state and synaptic fluctuations exert a powerful effect on neuronal gain at the single-cell level.

    “Together, temporally coincident changes in conductance state and synaptic fluctuations exert a powerful effect on neuronal gain at the single-cell level57,58,60,61,83,84.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [84]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holt, G. R., & Koch, C.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Computation and Neural Systems Program, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, U.S.A.
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1001-1013
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2135370405
Cited by
250
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
shunting inhibition, divisive normalization, firing rate, excitatory postsynaptic potentials, product inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Electric Conductivity, Membrane Potentials, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Synapses, Pyramidal Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review