Cited by 422Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior

Jonas, Eva, Schimel, Jeff, Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

From the perspective of terror management theory, reminders of mortality should intensify the desire to express culturally prescribed prosocial attitudes and engage in culturally prescribed prosocial behaviors. Two studies supported these hypotheses. In Study 1, people were interviewed in close proximity to a funeral home or several blocks away and were asked to indicate their attitudes toward two charities they deemed important. Those who were interviewed in front of the funeral home reported more favorability toward these charities than those who were interviewed several blocks away. In Study 2, the authors found that following mortality salience, people gave more money to a charity supporting an American cause than people who had been exposed to an aversive control topic. However, mortality salience had no effect on the amount of money given to a foreign cause. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014616702236834

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Becker, E., 1962, The birth and death of meaning
  2. Becker, E., 1971, The birth and death of meaning
  3. Becker, E., 1973, The denial of death
  4. Brown, R., 1978, Differentiation between social groups
  5. Carson, E. D., 1990, Faith and philanthrophy in America
  6. Dickens, C., 1950, A Christmas carol
  7. Erickson, E. H., 1963, Childhood and society
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Myers, D. C., 1992, The pursuit of happiness
  10. Ochsmann, R., 1994, Depreciating of and distancing from foreigners: Effects of mortality salience
  11. Ochsmann, R., 1994, Evaluation of moral and immoral behavior: Evidence for terror management theory
  12. Rimor, M., 1990, Faith and philanthrophy in America
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.35 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 422

Metadata

Authors
Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Jonas, Eva
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2002-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1342-1353
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2049867294
Cited by
420
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, prosocial attitudes, prosocial behavior, charitable giving, cultural values, fear of death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review