Cited by 195RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryImmunotoxicology and immune responses

Safety Evaluation of Lipid Nanoparticle–Formulated Modified mRNA in the Sprague-Dawley Rat and Cynomolgus Monkey

Sedic, Maja, Senn, Joseph J., Lynn, Andy, Laska, Michael, Smith, Mike, Platz, Stefan J., Bolen, Joseph, Hoge, Stephen +4 more·2018·Veterinary Pathology

Abstract

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and safety of modified mRNA formulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) were evaluated after repeat intravenous infusion to rats and monkeys. In both species, modified mRNA encoding the protein for human erythropoietin (hEPO) had predictable and consistent pharmacologic and toxicologic effects. Pharmacokinetic analysis conducted following the first dose showed that measured hEPO levels were maximal at 6 hours after the end of intravenous infusion and in excess of 100-fold the anticipated efficacious exposure (17.6 ng/ml) at the highest dose tested. 24 hEPO was pharmacologically active in both the rat and the monkey, as indicated by a significant increase in red blood cell mass parameters. The primary safety-related findings were caused by the exaggerated pharmacology of hEPO and included increased hematopoiesis in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (rats) and minimal hemorrhage in the heart (monkeys). Additional primary safety-related findings in the rat included mildly increased white blood cell counts, changes in the coagulation parameters at all doses, as well as liver injury and release of interferon γ–inducible protein 10 in high-dose groups only. In the monkey, as seen with the parenteral administration of cationic LNPs, splenic necrosis and lymphocyte depletion were observed, accompanied with mild and reversible complement activation. These findings defined a well-tolerated dose level above the anticipated efficacious dose. Overall, these combined studies indicate that LNP-formulated modified mRNA can be administered by intravenous infusion in 2 toxicologically relevant test species and generate supratherapeutic levels of protein (hEPO) in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0300985817738095

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo application of lipid nanoparticles has been reported to induce liver and lung injuries in rodents.

    “In vivo application of lipid nanoparticles has been reported to induce liver and lung injuries in rodents170,173, which may be attributed to the cytotoxicity of the materials and the induction of”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [173]

  • The complement system and Toll-like receptors may participate in innate immune activation by immunogenic lipids.

    “Although the immunogenicity of these lipids has not yet been fully understood, complement system and Toll-like receptors may participate in innate immune activation170,173–175.”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [173]

  • Cationic and ionizable lipids have been reported to stimulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species.

    “Cationic and ionizable lipids have also been reported to stimulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species170–173.”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [173]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Casadevall N, 2003, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 18, viii37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sedic, M., Senn, J. J., Lynn, A., Laska, M., Smith, M., Platz, S. J., Bolen, J., Hoge, S., Bulychev, A., Jacquinet, E., Bartlett, V., & Smith, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • AstraZeneca, Melbourn, Royston, UK
  • PureTech (United States) (US)
  • Akcea Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Senn, Joseph J.
Venue
Veterinary Pathology
Published
2017-11-30
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
341-354
ISSN
  • 0300-9858 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-2217
OpenAlex
W2774359469
Cited by
195
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Moderna
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
Keywords
modified mRNA, human erythropoietin, intravenous infusion, hematopoiesis, splenic necrosis, lymphocyte depletion, complement activation, CXCL10, liver injury, coagulation parameters, nonclinical safety evaluation
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Coagulation, Erythropoietin, Female, Hematopoiesis, Infusions, Intravenous, Leukocyte Count, Lipids, Macaca fascicularis, Male, RNA, Messenger, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review