The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action, Outcome, and Value: A Dual-System Framework for Morality
Abstract
Dual-system approaches to psychology explain the fundamental properties of human judgment, decision making, and behavior across diverse domains. Yet, the appropriate characterization of each system is a source of debate. For instance, a large body of research on moral psychology makes use of the contrast between “emotional” and “rational/cognitive” processes, yet even the chief proponents of this division recognize its shortcomings. Largely independently, research in the computational neurosciences has identified a broad division between two algorithms for learning and choice derived from formal models of reinforcement learning. One assigns value to actions intrinsically based on past experience, while another derives representations of value from an internally represented causal model of the world. This division between action- and outcome-based value representation provides an ideal framework for a dual-system theory in the moral domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478
Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences
Sutton, R. S. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00115009 · Cited by 5,148
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 1×
“The utility of a dual-system framework for understanding human judgment, reasoning, and behavior has been forcefully argued elsewhere (Epstein, 1994; Kahneman, 2011; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 · Cited by 2,620
Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning
O'Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094285 · Cited by 2,088
Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons
Fiorillo, C. D., Tobler, P. N., & Schultz, W. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077349 · Cited by 2,085
Habits, Rituals, and the Evaluative Brain
Graybiel, A. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112851 · Cited by 1,697 · cited 2×
“) are also commonly defined over actions rather than outcomes, and it has been suggested that these may rely on model-free value representation (Graybiel, 2008).”
BackgroundDamage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05631 · Cited by 1,545
Self-citationTemporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain
O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Friston, K., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00169-7 · Cited by 1,522
Neuronal Coding of Prediction Errors
Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.473 · Cited by 1,427
Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.186 · Cited by 1,343
Midbrain dopamine neurons encode a quantitative reward prediction error signal
Bayer, H. M., & Glimcher, P. W. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.020 · Cited by 1,304
Yin, H. H., Knowlton, B. J., & Balleine, B. W. (2004) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03095.x · Cited by 1,226
Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia
(1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4708.001.0001 · Cited by 1,190
The Basal Ganglia and Chunking of Action Repertoires
Graybiel, A. M. (1998) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1006/nlme.1998.3843 · Cited by 1,042
Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2024 · Cited by 989
The neural basis of human moral cognition
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1768 · Cited by 930
Temporal Prediction Errors in a Passive Learning Task Activate Human Striatum
McClure, S. M., Berns, G. S., & Montague, P. R. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00154-5 · Cited by 917
Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model
FRANK, M. J., LOUGHRY, B., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2001) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.1.2.137 · Cited by 879
The development of aggressive behaviour during childhood: What have we learned in the past century?
Tremblay, R. E. (2000) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1080/016502500383232 · Cited by 842
The architecture of human kin detection
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05510 · Cited by 748
The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy
Blair, R. J. R. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003 · Cited by 742
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031021 · Cited by 696
A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications
HAUSER, M., CUSHMAN, F., YOUNG, L., KANG‐XING JIN, R., & MIKHAIL, J. (2007) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x · Cited by 666
Self-citationOlsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1968 · Cited by 622
Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans
Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Koltzenburg, M., Jones, A. K., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Frackowiak, R. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02581 · Cited by 605
Hikida, T., Kimura, K., Wada, N., Funabiki, K., & Nakanishi, S. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.05.011 · Cited by 592
When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude
Takahashi, H., Kato, M., Matsuura, M., Mobbs, D., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165604 · Cited by 508
Midbrain dopamine neurons encode decisions for future action
Morris, G., Nevet, A., Arkadir, D., Vaadia, E., & Bergman, H. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1743 · Cited by 503
Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsm001 · Cited by 436
Otto (2013) · doi:10.1177/0956797612463080 · Cited by 352
Learning fears by observing others: the neural systems of social fear transmission
Olsson, A., Nearing, K. I., & Phelps, E. A. (2007) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsm005 · Cited by 349
The intelligence of the moral intuitions: A comment on Haidt (2001).
Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.193 · Cited by 345
Recent Advances in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
Barto, A. G., & Mahadevan, S. (2003) · Discrete Event Dynamic Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1025696116075 · Cited by 317
Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation
Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21228 · Cited by 276
Guitart-Masip, M., Fuentemilla, L., Bach, D. R., Huys, Q. J. M., Dayan, P., Dolan, R. J., & Duzel, E. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6376-10.2011 · Cited by 216
A Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage
Moretto, G., Làdavas, E., Mattioli, F., & di Pellegrino, G. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21367 · Cited by 182
Patterns of Moral Judgment Derive From Nonmoral Psychological Representations
Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167.x · Cited by 179
Self-citationCools, R., Robinson, O. J., & Sahakian, B. (2008) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301598 · Cited by 172
The Neural Basis of Following Advice
Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., Krugel, L. K., & Heekeren, H. R. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001089 · Cited by 157
Neural systems underlying aversive conditioning in humans with primary and secondary reinforcers
Delgado, M. R., Jou, R. L., & Phelps, E. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00071 · Cited by 141
Cooper, J. C., Dunne, S., Furey, T., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00114 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000165 · Cited by 317
Miller, K. J., Shenhav, A., & Ludvig, E. A. (2019) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000120 · Cited by 280
Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135 · Cited by 210
The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2021) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004 · Cited by 201
Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.
Patil, I., Zucchelli, M. M., Kool, W., Campbell, S., Fornasier, F., Calò, M., Silani, G., Cikara, M., & Cushman, F. (2021) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000281 · Cited by 133
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cushman, F.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-07-16
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-292
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2119998956
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
