The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Abstract
This article explores the new modalities of visibility engendered by new media, with a focus on the social networking site Facebook. Influenced by Foucault’s writings on Panopticism – that is, the architectural structuring of visibility – this article argues for understanding the construction of visibility on Facebook through an architectural framework that pays particular attention to underlying software processes and algorithmic power. Through an analysis of EdgeRank, the algorithm structuring the flow of information and communication on Facebook’s ‘News Feed’, I argue that the regime of visibility constructed imposes a perceived ‘threat of invisibility’ on the part of the participatory subject. As a result, I reverse Foucault’s notion of surveillance as a form of permanent visibility, arguing that participatory subjectivity is not constituted through the imposed threat of an all-seeing vision machine, but by the constant possibility of disappearing and becoming obsolete.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1080/01972240802701627 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444809336551 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1057/9780230306479 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015424.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444807081228 · DOI · Paper page
- Deleuze G, 1992, October, 3
- Deleuze G, 2006, Foucault
- Dodge M, 2010, Urbis Research Forum Review, 1, 15
- Foucault M, 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262062749.001.0001 · DOI
- Goffman E, 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience
- Hargittai E (2007) The social, political, economic, and cultural dimensions of search engines: An introduction. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication 12(3). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue3/hargittai.html (accessed 15 September 2011). · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444806069648 · DOI
- Hoffman M, 2011, Michel Foucault: Key Concepts
- 10.1080/01972240050133634 · DOI
- Kincaid J (2010) EdgeRank: The secret sauce that makes Facebook’s news feed tick. Techcrunch. Available at:http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/22/facebook-edgerank (accessed 20 April 2011). · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444809105351 · DOI
- 10.22230/cjc.2009v34n3a2114 · DOI
- Latour B, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society
- 10.1177/001872674700100201 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/267990 · DOI · Paper page
- Mackenzie A, 2006, Cutting Code: Software and Sociality
- 10.1515/9781503625365-007 · DOI
- MacKenzie D, 2009, Material Markets: How Economic Agents are Constructed
- McLuhan M, 1964, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
- 10.1177/1461444810365297 · DOI · Paper page
- Pasquinelli M, 2009, Deep Search, 152
- Rajchman J, 1988, October, 89
- 10.1177/0263276405059413 · DOI · Paper page
- Wardrip-Fruin N, 2009, Expressive Processing
Cited by
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001 · Cited by 2,951
The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology
Van Dijck, J. (2014) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 · Cited by 2,203
The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818769694 · Cited by 1,530
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 · Cited by 1,174
Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram
Cotter, K. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818815684 · Cited by 1,025
The social power of algorithms
Beer, D. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147 · Cited by 945
What makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets
Kitchin, R., & McArdle, G. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716631130 · Cited by 606
Williamson, B. (2016) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758 · Cited by 522
To be or not to be algorithm aware: a question of a new digital divide?
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1736124 · Cited by 410
Self-citationToward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness
Ananny, M. (2016) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915606523 · Cited by 395
Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed
Rader, E., & Gray, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702174 · Cited by 386
The Challenges of Algorithm-Based HR Decision-Making for Personal Integrity
Leicht-Deobald, U., Busch, T., Schank, C., Weibel, A., Schafheitle, S., Wildhaber, I., & Kasper, G. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04204-w · Cited by 347
Trusted strangers: Carework platforms’ cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy
Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818773727 · Cited by 320
For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok
Simpson, E., & Semaan, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3432951 · Cited by 230
Arriagada, A., & Ibáñez, F. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120944624 · Cited by 238
“Others are strategically obscured to creators and users alike, such as when algorithmic shifts determine the order of content in the feed and, consequently, exposure (Bucher, 2012; O’Meara, 2019).”
Background“Gaming the System”: Platform Paternalism and the Politics of Algorithmic Visibility
Petre, C., Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119879995 · Cited by 225
Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in google classroom
Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597 · Cited by 208
Computing the everyday: Social media as data platforms
Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1318327 · Cited by 205
Development and Validation of an Algorithm Literacy Scale for Internet Users
Dogruel, L., Masur, P., & Joeckel, S. (2022) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361 · Cited by 177
Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-Right” Gaze
Massanari, A. L. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768302 · Cited by 156
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817744390 · Cited by 155
Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates
Karlsen, R., Steen-Johnsen, K., Wollebæk, D., & Enjolras, B. (2017) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323117695734 · Cited by 154
Generalised scepticism: how people navigate news on social media
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1450887 · Cited by 146
Bonini, T., & Gandini, A. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119880006 · Cited by 146
Boukes, M. (2019) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2019.1572568 · Cited by 127
Algorithms and Taste-Making: Exposing the Netflix Recommender System’s Operational Logics
Pajkovic, N. (2022) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565211014464 · Cited by 125
Airoldi, M., & Rokka, J. (2022) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726 · Cited by 111
Algorithmic IF … THEN rules and the conditions and consequences of power
Neyland, D., & Möllers, N. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1156141 · Cited by 108
Artificial intelligence in the information ecosystem: Affordances for everyday information seeking
Hirvonen, N., Jylhä, V., Lao, Y., & Larsson, S. (2024) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24860 · Cited by 107
Visual misinformation on Facebook
Yang, Y., Davis, T., & Hindman, M. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac051 · Cited by 101
Teaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811912101410 · Cited by 97
The Friendship Assemblage: Investigating Programmed Sociality on Facebook
Bucher, T. (2013) · Television & New Media · doi:10.1177/1527476412452800 · Cited by 91
Self-citationWitnessing in the new memory ecology: Memory construction of the Syrian conflict on YouTube
Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815604618 · Cited by 71
Koenig, A. (2020) · Computers and Composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102611 · Cited by 69
Examining the interactive effects of the filter bubble and the echo chamber on radicalization
Wolfowicz, M., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09471-0 · Cited by 54
Do Algorithms Shape Character? Considering Algorithmic Ethical Subjectivation
Magalhães, J. C. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118768301 · Cited by 52
Desirable or Distasteful? Exploring Uncertainty in Human-Chatbot Relationships
Pan, S., Cui, J., & Mou, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2256554 · Cited by 44
Strategic Invisibility: How Creators Manage the Risks and Constraints of Online Hyper(In)Visibility
Stegeman, H. M., Are, C., & Poell, T. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241244674 · Cited by 45
“On large commercial platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, there is a constant “threat of invisibility” (Bucher, 2012, p. 1171; Gillespie, 2018).”
Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic Systems
Pääkkönen, J., Nelimarkka, M., Haapoja, J., & Lampinen, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376780 · Cited by 35
Huang, Y., & Ye, W. (2024) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565231211117 · Cited by 37
‘Do your own research': affordance activation and disinformation spread
Tripodi, F. B., Garcia, L. C., & Marwick, A. E. (2024) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2245869 · Cited by 31
Contesting #StopIslam: The Dynamics of a Counter-narrative Against Right-wing Populism
Poole, E., Giraud, E., & de Quincey, E. (2019) · Open Library of Humanities · doi:10.16995/olh.406 · Cited by 30
Lundahl, O. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1864006 · Cited by 29
Algorithms and the narration of past selves
Jacobsen, B. N. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1834603 · Cited by 24
Technologically situated: the tacit rules of platform participation
Pangrazio, L. (2019) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2019.1575345 · Cited by 21
How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections
Wilson-Barnao, C. (2017) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2017.1331910 · Cited by 20
Draper, N. A. (2020) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764220945354 · Cited by 15
Sculpting digital voids: The politics of forgetting on Facebook
Jacobsen, B. N. (2021) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520907390 · Cited by 12
‘Put it away! Put it away!’: Negotiating smartphone norms in performing arts
Enli, G. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251410967
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucher, T.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-04-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1164-1180
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2109741756
- Cited by
- 1,289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 125.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.