The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation
Open accessAbstract
The evolution of human cooperation remains a puzzle because cooperation persists even in conditions that rule out mainstream explanations. We present a novel solution that links two recent theories. First, Johnson & Kruger (2004) suggested that ancestral cooperation was promoted because norm violations were deterred by the threat of supernatural punishment. However, this only works if individuals attribute negative life events (or a prospective afterlife) as intentionally caused by supernatural agents. A complementary cognitive mechanism is therefore required. Recently, Bering and Shackelford (2004) suggested precisely this. The evolution of “theory of mind” and, specifically, the “intentionality system” (a cognitive system devoted to making inferences about the epistemic contents and intentions of other minds), strongly favoured: (1) the selection of human psychological traits for monitoring and controlling the flow of social information within groups; and (2) attributions of life events to supernatural agency. We argue that natural selection favoured such attributions because, in a cognitively sophisticated social environment, a fear of supernatural punishment steered individuals away from costly social transgressions resulting from unrestrained, evolutionarily ancestral, selfish interest (acts which would rapidly become known to others, and thereby incur an increased probability and severity of punishment by group members). As long as the net costs of selfish actions from real-world punishment by group members exceeded the net costs of lost opportunities from self-imposed norm abiding, then god-fearing individuals would outcompete non-believers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Evolutionary theories of religion predict that prejudice against atheists may persist even in secular cultures, either as part of a suite of adaptations linking belief to withingroup cooperation 20 , or as a consequence of culturally transmitted 21 and entrenched proreligious norms 22 .”
From Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
Schelling, T. C. (1960) · Cited by 7,691
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 · Cited by 7,678
Nielsen, R. P., & Axelrod, R. (1985) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257983 · Cited by 6,517
Sociobiology: The New Synthesis.
Lenski, G. E., & Wilson, E. O. (1976) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2576242 · Cited by 6,271
Altruistic punishment in humans
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415137a · Cited by 5,616
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,222
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02043 · Cited by 3,475 · cited 4×
“; (4) Some fraction of people altruistically punish defectors for the good of the group (Fehr and Gächter 2002; Fehr and Fischbacher 2003), and this trait is propagated by group selection (however, this requires that humans are genuinely altruistic, a claim that is problematic for a number of…”
BackgroundInfluentialEvolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31225 · Cited by 2,700
Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior
(1999) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00372.x · Cited by 2,551
The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4305 · Cited by 2,452
Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity
Rappaport, R. A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814686 · Cited by 2,295
Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible
Elinor Ostrom, B., Walker, J. M., & Gardner, R. (1992) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1964229 · Cited by 2,066
Religion explained: the evolutionary origins of religious thought
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2732a · Cited by 1,935
The evolution of altruistic punishment
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0630443100 · Cited by 1,748
Alexander, R. D. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203700976 · Cited by 1,695
Foundations of Human Sociality
Henrich, J., Boyd, R. T., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. M. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199262055.001.0001 · Cited by 1,401
The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good.
Yamagishi, T. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110 · Cited by 1,359
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature
Author, P. (2002) · Mankind Quarterly · doi:10.46469/mq.2002.43.2.5 · Cited by 1,328
Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81 · Cited by 1,180
Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality
Gintis, H. M. (2000) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111 · Cited by 1,142
Wilson, D. S. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226901374.001.0001 · Cited by 1,135
Weber, M., & Fischoff, E. (1920) · Cited by 1,064
Punishment in animal societies
Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/373209a0 · Cited by 1,043
Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences
Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. R. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00036104 · Cited by 967
Why would anyone believe in God?
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3375a · Cited by 952
Costly Signaling and Cooperation
Gintis, H. M., Smith, E. A., & Bowles, S. (2001) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2406 · Cited by 877
The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases
Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3 · Cited by 838
(2001) · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202 · Cited by 803
Origins of the social mind: evolutionary psychology and child development
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0633 · Cited by 769
Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000172 · Cited by 759
Dugatkin, L. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195086218.001.0001 · Cited by 734
Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior
Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.10120 · Cited by 699
Evolution and the capacity for commitment
Nesse, R. M. (2001) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 653
Sigmund, K., Hauert, C., & Nowak, M. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.161155698 · Cited by 644
Wilson, E. O. (2000) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjnrttd · Cited by 610
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation
Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W. T., & Vesterlund, L. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322157142 · Cited by 608
Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature
Kelemen, D. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.x · Cited by 594
Cooperation and Commune Longevity: A Test of the Costly Signaling Theory of Religion
Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397103037002003 · Cited by 569 · cited 1×
“For example, Richard Sosis has shown that, among a large sample of 19th century communes, religious groups with more costly rituals out-survived secular groups and religious groups with fewer rituals (Sosis and Bressler 2003).”
BackgroundWhitehouse, H. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198234142.001.0001 · Cited by 564
The Natural Emergence of Reasoning About the Afterlife as a Developmental Regularity.
Bering, J. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.217 · Cited by 434
Self-citationSosis, R. H. (2003) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1000-6 · Cited by 431
Collective Action and the Second-Order Free-Rider Problem
Heckathorn, D. D. (1989) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463189001001006 · Cited by 396
Altruism as a Handicap: The Limitations of Kin Selection and Reciprocity
Zahavi, A. A. (1995) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.2307/3677205 · Cited by 394
Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. J. (2003) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/379260 · Cited by 389
Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols
Alcorta, C. S., & Sosis, R. H. (2005) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1014-3 · Cited by 379
Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment.
Irons, W. (2001) · Cited by 329
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0 · Cited by 323
Self-citationArguments and Icons: Divergent Modes of Religiosity
Whitehouse, H. (2000) · Cited by 314
Roes, F. (2003) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00134-4 · Cited by 286 · cited 2×
“The new evolutionary approach has given rise to a number of theories arguing that religion was a key promoter of within-group cooperation during human evolution (e.g. Cronk 1994; Irons 2001; Roes and Raymond 2003; Sosis 2003; Wilson 2002), but this work remains totally absent from the literature on “strong reciprocity…”
BackgroundThe Existential Theory of Mind
Bering, J. M. (2002) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.1.3 · Cited by 273
Self-citationThe Biology of Moral SystemsRichard D. Alexander New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1987
Barner-Barry, C. (1988) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0730938400003816 · Cited by 267
Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation
Robinson, P. H. (2004) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/24.2.173 · Cited by 261
Do Not Go Cheaply into That Good Night: Death-Ritual Consumption in Asante, Ghana: Table 1
Bonsu, S. K., & Belk, R. W. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/374699 · Cited by 245
The Good of Wrath: Supernatural Punishment and the Evolution of Cooperation
JOHNSON, D. D. P., & Krüger, O. (2004) · Political Theology · doi:10.1558/poth.2004.5.2.159 · Cited by 236
Self-citationThe Biological and Evolutionary Logic of Human Cooperation
Burnham, T. C., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2005-0107 · Cited by 231
Self-citationPrisoner's Dilemma: John Von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb
Poundstone, W., & Metropolis, N. (1992) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2809809 · Cited by 225
Koenig, L. B., McGue, M. K., Krueger, R. F., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00316.x · Cited by 217
The puzzle of human cooperation
JOHNSON, D. D. P., Stopka, P., & Knights, S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/421911b · Cited by 205
Self-citationPrisoner's Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb
FANN, W. E. (1993) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.150.12.1891-a · Cited by 196
Solving the Puzzle of Prosociality
Gintis, H. M. (2003) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463103015002001 · Cited by 176
"O Lord… You Perceive my Thoughts from Afar": Recursiveness and the Evolution of Supernatural Agency
Bering, J. M., & JOHNSON, D. D. P. (2005) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/1568537054068679 · Cited by 173
Self-citationTheories of Illness: A World Survey
Trotter, R. T., & Murdock, G. P. (1983) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3317950 · Cited by 158
The formation of hell: death and retribution in the ancient and early Christian worlds
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4319 · Cited by 152
EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THE MANIPULATIVE USE OF SIGNALS
Cronk1, L. (1994) · Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.1994.tb00651.x · Cited by 149
The Mentality of Apes Revisited
Povinelli, D. J., & Bering, J. M. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00181 · Cited by 144
Self-citationMurdock, G. P. (1980) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.13110791 · Cited by 124
Pals, D. L. (2006) · Cited by 124
Anthropological Studies of Religion: An Introductory Text
WERBNER, R. P., & Morris, B. (1988) · Journal of Religion in Africa · doi:10.2307/1580948 · Cited by 103
(1994) Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. BBS 17: 585-654
Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. R. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · Cited by 91
The illusion of external agency.
Gilbert, D. T., Brown, R. P., Pinel, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.690 · Cited by 77
Survival strategies: cooperation and conflict in animal societies
Gadagkar, R. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5070 · Cited by 63
Evolution and ethics: human morality in biological and religious perspective
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4571 · Cited by 59
The illusion of external agency.
Gilbert, D. T., Brown, R. P., Pinel, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.690 · Cited by 54
The function of menstrual taboos among the dogon
Strassmann, B. I. (1992) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/bf02692249 · Cited by 51
The Causal Role of Consciousness: A Conceptual Addendum to Human Evolutionary Psychology
Bering, J. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2004) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.227 · Cited by 41
Self-citationAdaptive illusions: optimism, control, and human rationality
Nettle, D. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528975.003.0010 · Cited by 40
The Evolutionary History of an Illusion: Religious Causal Beliefs in Children and Adults.
Bering, J. M. (2005) · Cited by 34
Self-citationThe puzzle of human cooperation
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/421912a · Cited by 30
Religious Traditions of the World
Lewis, J. F., & Travis, W. G. (1991) · Cited by 27
The Orthodox Kibbutzim and Economic Success
Fishman, A., & Goldschmidt, Y. (1990) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1387315 · Cited by 19
Sin and Salvation in the World Religions: A Short Introduction
COWARD, H. G. (2003) · Cited by 9
Gadagkar, R. (2001) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1dfv9b7 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chagnon N. A., 1997, Yanomamo
- Cronk L., 1994, Zygon, 4, 117
- Dudley M. K., 2003, A Hawaiian Nation I: Man, Gods, and Nature
- Harrison E., 1960, Wycliffe Dictionary of Theology
- Thomas W. I., 1928, The Child in America: Behaviour Problems and Programs
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice.
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025882 · Cited by 495
McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990975 · Cited by 474
Bering, J. M. (2006) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x06009101 · Cited by 458
Self-citationMcKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038455 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, D., & Bering, J.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Venue
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1474-7049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2177818176
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 55.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evolutionary Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- evolution of cooperation, supernatural punishment, theory of mind, agency attribution, norm violation, social transgression, religious beliefs, afterlife beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review